diff mbox

powerpc/mm: Add a parameter to disable 1TB segs

Message ID 1467593044-10600-1-git-send-email-oohall@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show

Commit Message

Oliver O'Halloran July 4, 2016, 12:44 a.m. UTC
This patch adds the kernel command line parameter "no_tb_segs" which
forces the kernel to use 256MB rather than 1TB segments. Forcing the use
of 256MB segments makes it considerably easier to test code that depends
on an SLB miss occurring.

Suggested-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

Comments

Balbir Singh July 4, 2016, 4:59 a.m. UTC | #1
On 04/07/16 10:44, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This patch adds the kernel command line parameter "no_tb_segs" which
> forces the kernel to use 256MB rather than 1TB segments. Forcing the use
> of 256MB segments makes it considerably easier to test code that depends
> on an SLB miss occurring.
> 
> Suggested-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> index 5b22ba0b58bc..6da1a9d18e15 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> @@ -321,6 +321,15 @@ int htab_remove_mapping(unsigned long vstart, unsigned long vend,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static bool no_tb_segs = false;
> +
> +static int __init parse_no_tb_segs(char *p)
> +{
> +	no_tb_segs = true;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("no_tb_segs", parse_no_tb_segs);


Please update Documentation/kernel-paramaters.txt as well and document the use case and the
fact that this for debugging. 

> +
>  static int __init htab_dt_scan_seg_sizes(unsigned long node,
>  					 const char *uname, int depth,
>  					 void *data)
> @@ -339,6 +348,12 @@ static int __init htab_dt_scan_seg_sizes(unsigned long node,
>  	for (; size >= 4; size -= 4, ++prop) {
>  		if (be32_to_cpu(prop[0]) == 40) {
>  			DBG("1T segment support detected\n");
> +
> +			if (no_tb_segs) {
> +				DBG("Forcing 256MB segments\n");
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
>  			cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features |= MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT;
>  			return 1;
>  		}
> 

Otherwise

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>

Balbir
Michael Ellerman July 4, 2016, 6:09 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 2016-04-07 at 00:44:04 UTC, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This patch adds the kernel command line parameter "no_tb_segs" which
> forces the kernel to use 256MB rather than 1TB segments. Forcing the use
> of 256MB segments makes it considerably easier to test code that depends
> on an SLB miss occurring.

That's a fairly awful name :)

Can you call it "disable_1T_segments" ?

It should also be mentioned in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, with
emphasis that it's a debug option and powerpc only.

cheers
Michael Neuling July 5, 2016, 12:24 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:09 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-07 at 00:44:04 UTC, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> > 
> > This patch adds the kernel command line parameter "no_tb_segs" which
> > forces the kernel to use 256MB rather than 1TB segments. Forcing the
> > use
> > of 256MB segments makes it considerably easier to test code that
> > depends
> > on an SLB miss occurring.
> That's a fairly awful name :)
> 
> Can you call it "disable_1T_segments" ?

> 
> It should also be mentioned in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, with
> emphasis that it's a debug option and powerpc only.

To that end, should we add "powerpc_" at the start of the option?

Mikey
Oliver O'Halloran July 5, 2016, 12:53 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:09 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-04-07 at 00:44:04 UTC, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>> >
>> > This patch adds the kernel command line parameter "no_tb_segs" which
>> > forces the kernel to use 256MB rather than 1TB segments. Forcing the
>> > use
>> > of 256MB segments makes it considerably easier to test code that
>> > depends
>> > on an SLB miss occurring.
>> That's a fairly awful name :)
>>
>> Can you call it "disable_1T_segments" ?
>>
>>
>> It should also be mentioned in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, with
>> emphasis that it's a debug option and powerpc only.
>
> To that end, should we add "powerpc_" at the start of the option?

I don't think it's necessary. There are annotations in
kernel-parameters.txt that indicate what options are arch specific and
it looks like none of the existing architecture specific options are
prefixed.

>
> Mikey
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
index 5b22ba0b58bc..6da1a9d18e15 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
@@ -321,6 +321,15 @@  int htab_remove_mapping(unsigned long vstart, unsigned long vend,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static bool no_tb_segs = false;
+
+static int __init parse_no_tb_segs(char *p)
+{
+	no_tb_segs = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+early_param("no_tb_segs", parse_no_tb_segs);
+
 static int __init htab_dt_scan_seg_sizes(unsigned long node,
 					 const char *uname, int depth,
 					 void *data)
@@ -339,6 +348,12 @@  static int __init htab_dt_scan_seg_sizes(unsigned long node,
 	for (; size >= 4; size -= 4, ++prop) {
 		if (be32_to_cpu(prop[0]) == 40) {
 			DBG("1T segment support detected\n");
+
+			if (no_tb_segs) {
+				DBG("Forcing 256MB segments\n");
+				break;
+			}
+
 			cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features |= MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT;
 			return 1;
 		}