diff mbox

ehea: Fix memory hook reference counting crashes

Message ID 1429854752-5698-1-git-send-email-mpe@ellerman.id.au (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Michael Ellerman
Headers show

Commit Message

Michael Ellerman April 24, 2015, 5:52 a.m. UTC
The recent commit to only register the EHEA memory hotplug hooks on
adapter probe has a few problems.

Firstly the reference counting is wrong for multiple adapters, in that
the hooks are registered multiple times. Secondly the check in the tear
down path is backward. Finally the error path doesn't decrement the
count.

The multiple registration of the hooks is the biggest problem, as it
leads to oopses when the system is rebooted, and/or errors during memory
hotplug, eg:

  $ ./mem-on-off-test.sh -r 2
  ...
  ehea: memory is going offline
  ehea: LPAR memory changed - re-initializing driver
  ehea: re-initializing driver complete
  ehea: memory is going offline
  ehea: LPAR memory changed - re-initializing driver
  ehea: opcode=26c ret=fffffffffffffffc arg1=8000000003000003 arg2=0 arg3=700000060000d600 arg4=3fded0000 arg5=200 arg6=0 arg7=0
  ehea: register_rpage_mr failed
  ehea: registering mr failed
  ehea: register MR failed - driver inoperable!
  ehea: memory is going offline

Fixes: aa183323312d ("ehea: Register memory hotplug, reboot and crash hooks on adapter probe")
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller April 25, 2015, 6:43 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:52:32 +1000

> The recent commit to only register the EHEA memory hotplug hooks on
> adapter probe has a few problems.
> 
> Firstly the reference counting is wrong for multiple adapters, in that
> the hooks are registered multiple times. Secondly the check in the tear
> down path is backward. Finally the error path doesn't decrement the
> count.
> 
> The multiple registration of the hooks is the biggest problem, as it
> leads to oopses when the system is rebooted, and/or errors during memory
> hotplug, eg:
 ...
> Fixes: aa183323312d ("ehea: Register memory hotplug, reboot and crash hooks on adapter probe")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Applied, but using an atomic counter for this is really inappropriate
and is what lead to this bug in the first place.

You're not counting anything, because if you were, then you would be
decrementing this thing somewhere.

Rather, it's purely a boolean state saying "I did X".  So it should be
a boolean, and no atomicity nor other special considerations are
needed for setting it to true.
Michael Ellerman April 27, 2015, 12:30 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 14:43 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:52:32 +1000
> 
> > The recent commit to only register the EHEA memory hotplug hooks on
> > adapter probe has a few problems.
> > 
> > Firstly the reference counting is wrong for multiple adapters, in that
> > the hooks are registered multiple times. Secondly the check in the tear
> > down path is backward. Finally the error path doesn't decrement the
> > count.
> > 
> > The multiple registration of the hooks is the biggest problem, as it
> > leads to oopses when the system is rebooted, and/or errors during memory
> > hotplug, eg:
>  ...
> > Fixes: aa183323312d ("ehea: Register memory hotplug, reboot and crash hooks on adapter probe")
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> 
> Applied, but using an atomic counter for this is really inappropriate
> and is what lead to this bug in the first place.
> 
> You're not counting anything, because if you were, then you would be
> decrementing this thing somewhere.
> 
> Rather, it's purely a boolean state saying "I did X".  So it should be
> a boolean, and no atomicity nor other special considerations are
> needed for setting it to true.

Yeah I agree, it's a mess.

We should be unregistering the hooks when the last adapter is removed, which is
where we'd do the decrement. As it's written the hooks stay registered until
the driver is removed.

I'll try and find time, or someone else with time, to fix it up properly for 4.2.

cheers
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
index c05e50759621..00d86be0c831 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c
@@ -3347,7 +3347,7 @@  static int ehea_register_memory_hooks(void)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (atomic_inc_and_test(&ehea_memory_hooks_registered))
+	if (atomic_inc_return(&ehea_memory_hooks_registered) > 1)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = ehea_create_busmap();
@@ -3381,12 +3381,14 @@  out3:
 out2:
 	unregister_reboot_notifier(&ehea_reboot_nb);
 out:
+	atomic_dec(&ehea_memory_hooks_registered);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static void ehea_unregister_memory_hooks(void)
 {
-	if (atomic_read(&ehea_memory_hooks_registered))
+	/* Only remove the hooks if we've registered them */
+	if (atomic_read(&ehea_memory_hooks_registered) == 0)
 		return;
 
 	unregister_reboot_notifier(&ehea_reboot_nb);