| Message ID | 20250606124428.148164-2-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show
Return-Path:
<linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org
Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=DgOQwzNN;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key;
unprotected) header.d=antgroup.com header.i=@antgroup.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=default header.b=HqXKMc/Q;
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org;
spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org
(client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org;
envelope-from=linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org;
receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org
[IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)
(No client certificate requested)
by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bDLcd68bRz1yFX
for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:44:48 +1000 (AEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help
:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:
Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner;
bh=mC3Byk4vYixYtR9/E873GeQIu44pq2w2vb1wyFywZgM=; b=DgOQwzNNTEIzufSfHuTV5ofP8K
6xoPNWXc8q0Qbxl2dHljRLqEGe1Qc14kmxUyvAeqOAtvWzEEjYMENtyyBYxebgJRQVChi2TyeOds3
a9i5KoZfL+dRmJ8XVLXhEn3FjbSS+2RoTzPrMEhBGX2RaHiYblZZeVYYCGTHwwEz4ZkXZaVy3zcnM
HPHS8MC/fm1bkR7Z2vtKwXjVOlihqrkW+QiI74FkMELuhciE32Xy8TETPaaMmZtiBgHoFU3trPTo6
WF6J/dik/4hEP6u+S2YZZriuxepqQFAJUPVunsOOBNM2GPzF/1m9YxI9an/elCNvQ2kym4v1GRpFf
KKvHLshg==;
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org)
by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
id 1uNWRO-00000000Gzn-0eVa;
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 12:44:58 +0000
Received: from out0-211.mail.aliyun.com ([140.205.0.211])
by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
id 1uNWRK-00000000Gnp-0GYf
for linux-um@lists.infradead.org;
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 12:44:56 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=antgroup.com; s=default;
t=1749213886; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version;
bh=mC3Byk4vYixYtR9/E873GeQIu44pq2w2vb1wyFywZgM=;
b=HqXKMc/QK/Rdi5yforZsMSxS2jdIX4rlll/kgoMBvTGrD1Yma9o/J8ioLHcEZL+GjqEqQ1jVH63k9diNDUU3BE6djRl1/6IJCEbsTOcxQWzNr6WJu65dpDG3oght7DBtNWyf0XJEjuQ1R0cHSCgpAPzT0luGDuVJmZursC/I3sY=
Received: from ubuntu..(mailfrom:tiwei.btw@antgroup.com
fp:SMTPD_---.dD3Yx0Z_1749213882 cluster:ay29)
by smtp.aliyun-inc.com;
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 20:44:43 +0800
From: "Tiwei Bie" <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
To: richard@nod.at,
anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com,
johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
"Tiwei Bie" <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] um: ubd: Add missing error check in start_io_thread()
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 20:44:25 +0800
Message-Id: <20250606124428.148164-2-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
In-Reply-To: <20250606124428.148164-1-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
References: <20250606124428.148164-1-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3
X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250606_054454_480644_26245A15
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.62 )
X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message.
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: The subsequent call to os_set_fd_block() overwrites the
previous
return value. OR the two return values together to fix it. Fixes:
f88f0bdfc32f
("um: UBD Improvements") Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
--- arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
1 deletion(-)
Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[140.205.0.211 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
signature
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
envelope-from domain
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[140.205.0.211 listed in
sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[140.205.0.211 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
for more information.
[140.205.0.211 listed in
bl.score.senderscore.com]
X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: <linux-um.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-um>,
<mailto:linux-um-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-um/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-um@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-um-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um>,
<mailto:linux-um-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-um" <linux-um-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org
|
| Series |
[1/4] um: ubd: Add missing error check in start_io_thread()
|
expand
|
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c index c5e6545f6fcf..8e8a8bf518b6 100644 --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int start_io_thread(struct os_helper_thread **td_out, int *fd_out) *fd_out = fds[1]; err = os_set_fd_block(*fd_out, 0); - err = os_set_fd_block(kernel_fd, 0); + err |= os_set_fd_block(kernel_fd, 0); if (err) { printk("start_io_thread - failed to set nonblocking I/O.\n"); goto out_close;
The subsequent call to os_set_fd_block() overwrites the previous return value. OR the two return values together to fix it. Fixes: f88f0bdfc32f ("um: UBD Improvements") Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> --- arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)