From patchwork Thu Jan 28 00:50:46 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1432425 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1231::1; helo=merlin.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=DSe5LgNC; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dec2015msa header.b=F+klgDhG; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DR25Q4stCz9sVv for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:53:14 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=73I03gr4KbVptYhCb/VSYC1HcJ1x9Dv3laMB0/SMDaE=; b=DSe5LgNCTfbWGzH8PmZCRJk6Z kla7Mui+ciLXuZuOEN+LLqvy8MifUN0rebt7vlp3kyjg8Ek4qIf45UpIEUGDvoaMYdSpmW4Hs8SIL v/FkNZFl0sLpnvm40RZMM9PWu0Qdb196/pS7MpSSOIITGFj/KBChjq7M7+LSpo/YS4iVv0mVzLXeJ gsyaYMTXtN+3ZR5gFd4V7GTj9AHR9wTnVXmQ+Vay9ItHZ2oMOJw0NIOW1GpYIbo2xxljtuuMe+0Go LRQf5+cOV4SZbUT/9i6+60dRWsQllSn2Lay4DSIu4huL27vPDPLkyoaHlDxXGBNdcf9OO2REcMyA7 a49uAbu2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4vYU-0007nS-S3; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:53:02 +0000 Received: from conuserg-12.nifty.com ([210.131.2.79]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4vXl-0007YY-Vo; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:52:22 +0000 Received: from oscar.flets-west.jp (softbank126026094251.bbtec.net [126.26.94.251]) (authenticated) by conuserg-12.nifty.com with ESMTP id 10S0pjIZ024172; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:51:50 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-12.nifty.com 10S0pjIZ024172 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1611795111; bh=xfUMpPHMW1i+7E5Ee4SBhF1anYC2XCsj+hKMg2Rt8Gk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=F+klgDhGqjPkW0iyljZtDS/UVVookoKMar9wbf4BweDN3xyA6byQpu9mcEEUtCPXr 5Em1w71Sr4WmKw8UMJaHxg3Y6MP5Hquxu+aJ6aDLe5mi0bJllocGuR5nubDzp89f1N ZTIUFIoM/8w9fZDq6mot9Gvb+SafgOabPs5htRub+OqIYi3STKdebYBgO4x7pbnHe2 VZkfgtX2BHgbXDMMLkA9iKXN+H+PrVkaYfjLsYCMZ8fIDFjrqpY19b9ztBNvyLQV23 e08U3RVcWC+e2J6L6nyDK/8a+LetbQM5v4IzJ4hvr77kc/bebiilTElVi1wC1EWUl2 gFfoK2caGKw7Q== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [126.26.94.251] From: Masahiro Yamada To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 04/27] x86/entry/x32: rename __x32_compat_sys_* to __x64_compat_sys_* Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:50:46 +0900 Message-Id: <20210128005110.2613902-5-masahiroy@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210128005110.2613902-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> References: <20210128005110.2613902-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210127_195218_792162_FFE6EDB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.00 ) X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [210.131.2.79 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.5 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org In arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c, the macros are mapped to symbols as follows: __SYSCALL_COMMON(nr, sym) --> __x64_ __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) --> __x32_ Originally, the syscalls in the x32 special range (512-547) were all compat. This assumption is now broken after the following commits: 55db9c0e8534 ("net: remove compat_sys_{get,set}sockopt") 5f764d624a89 ("fs: remove the compat readv/writev syscalls") 598b3cec831f ("fs: remove compat_sys_vmsplice") c3973b401ef2 ("mm: remove compat_process_vm_{readv,writev}") Those commits redefined __x32_sys_* to __x64_sys_* because there is no stub like __x32_sys_*. I think defining as follows is sensible and cleaner. __SYSCALL_COMMON(nr, sym) --> __x64_ __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) --> __x64_ The ugly #define __x32_sys_* will go away. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c | 16 ++-------------- arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c index f2fe0a33bcfd..3fea8fb9cd6a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c @@ -8,27 +8,15 @@ #include #include -/* - * Reuse the 64-bit entry points for the x32 versions that occupy different - * slots in the syscall table. - */ -#define __x32_sys_readv __x64_sys_readv -#define __x32_sys_writev __x64_sys_writev -#define __x32_sys_getsockopt __x64_sys_getsockopt -#define __x32_sys_setsockopt __x64_sys_setsockopt -#define __x32_sys_vmsplice __x64_sys_vmsplice -#define __x32_sys_process_vm_readv __x64_sys_process_vm_readv -#define __x32_sys_process_vm_writev __x64_sys_process_vm_writev - #define __SYSCALL_64(nr, sym) -#define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) extern long __x32_##sym(const struct pt_regs *); +#define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) extern long __x64_##sym(const struct pt_regs *); #define __SYSCALL_COMMON(nr, sym) extern long __x64_##sym(const struct pt_regs *); #include #undef __SYSCALL_X32 #undef __SYSCALL_COMMON -#define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) [nr] = __x32_##sym, +#define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) [nr] = __x64_##sym, #define __SYSCALL_COMMON(nr, sym) [nr] = __x64_##sym, asmlinkage const sys_call_ptr_t x32_sys_call_table[__NR_x32_syscall_max+1] = { diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h index 80c08c7d5e72..6a2827d0681f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ extern long __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(const struct pt_regs *regs); * __x64_sys_*() - 64-bit native syscall * __ia32_sys_*() - 32-bit native syscall or common compat syscall * __ia32_compat_sys_*() - 32-bit compat syscall - * __x32_compat_sys_*() - 64-bit X32 compat syscall + * __x64_compat_sys_*() - 64-bit X32 compat syscall * * The registers are decoded according to the ABI: * 64-bit: RDI, RSI, RDX, R10, R8, R9 @@ -166,17 +166,17 @@ extern long __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(const struct pt_regs *regs); * with x86_64 obviously do not need such care. */ #define __X32_COMPAT_SYS_STUB0(name) \ - __SYS_STUB0(x32, compat_sys_##name) + __SYS_STUB0(x64, compat_sys_##name) #define __X32_COMPAT_SYS_STUBx(x, name, ...) \ - __SYS_STUBx(x32, compat_sys##name, \ + __SYS_STUBx(x64, compat_sys##name, \ SC_X86_64_REGS_TO_ARGS(x, __VA_ARGS__)) #define __X32_COMPAT_COND_SYSCALL(name) \ - __COND_SYSCALL(x32, compat_sys_##name) + __COND_SYSCALL(x64, compat_sys_##name) #define __X32_COMPAT_SYS_NI(name) \ - __SYS_NI(x32, compat_sys_##name) + __SYS_NI(x64, compat_sys_##name) #else /* CONFIG_X86_X32 */ #define __X32_COMPAT_SYS_STUB0(name) #define __X32_COMPAT_SYS_STUBx(x, name, ...)