Message ID | 20181016104730.4598-1-marcel@ziswiler.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ARM: dts: tegra: last minute fixes | expand |
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > Marcel Ziswiler (9): > ARM: tegra: fix simple-panel compatibles > ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1/colibri_t20/t30: eval/iris: fix regulator gpio > enable > ARM: tegra: colibri_t20: reorder pmic properties > ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1: further regulator clean-up > ARM: tegra: apalis_t30/tk1: annotate power I2C being on-module > ARM: tegra: colibri_t30: further regulator clean-up > ARM: tegra: apalis_t30: further regulator clean-up > ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix device_node refcounting > ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement These ASoC patches appear to have absolutely no relationship with the rest of the series. Is that the case or is there some dependency I'm missing?
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 12:58 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > > > Marcel Ziswiler (9): > > ARM: tegra: fix simple-panel compatibles > > ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1/colibri_t20/t30: eval/iris: fix regulator > > gpio > > enable > > ARM: tegra: colibri_t20: reorder pmic properties > > ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1: further regulator clean-up > > ARM: tegra: apalis_t30/tk1: annotate power I2C being on-module > > ARM: tegra: colibri_t30: further regulator clean-up > > ARM: tegra: apalis_t30: further regulator clean-up > > ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix device_node refcounting > > ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement > > These ASoC patches appear to have absolutely no relationship with the > rest of the series. Is that the case or is there some dependency I'm > missing? Not outside of all being Tegra specific stuff, no. If you prefer I may send them as a separate series.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:51:30AM +0000, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 12:58 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > These ASoC patches appear to have absolutely no relationship with the > > rest of the series. Is that the case or is there some dependency I'm > > missing? > Not outside of all being Tegra specific stuff, no. If you prefer I may > send them as a separate series. It's fine this time but do try to avoid doing that please - if things aren't related just send them separately. Bundling them up into a series creates confusion about dependencis and can result in things getting held up due to problems in the unrelated bits of the series.