| Message ID | 20210701082755.332593-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pwm: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-berlin.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-berlin.c index 5537b5f6dd5d..e157273fd2f7 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-berlin.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-berlin.c @@ -190,12 +190,9 @@ static int berlin_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, return 0; } - if (state->period != pwm->state.period || - state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle) { - err = berlin_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period); - if (err) - return err; - } + err = berlin_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period); + if (err) + return err; if (!enabled) return berlin_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
As the last call to berlin_pwm_apply() might have exited early if state->enabled was false, the values for period and duty_cycle stored in pwm->state might not have been written to hardware and it must be ensured that they are configured before enabling the PWM. Fixes: 30dffb42fcd4 ("pwm: berlin: Implement .apply() callback") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> --- drivers/pwm/pwm-berlin.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)