From patchwork Wed May 5 16:28:43 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1474429 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fb2GG0Nd0z9sT6 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:28:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233826AbhEEQ3s (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 12:29:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36956 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233794AbhEEQ3s (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 12:29:48 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD35C061574 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 09:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leKOG-0002T0-CW; Wed, 05 May 2021 18:28:48 +0200 Received: from ukl by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leKOE-0001Bc-NH; Wed, 05 May 2021 18:28:46 +0200 From: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Fabrice Gasnier , Thierry Reding , Lee Jones , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: stm32-lp: Don't check the return code of pwmchip_remove() Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:28:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20210505162843.188901-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210505162843.188901-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> References: <20210505162843.188901-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org pwmchip_remove() always returns 0. Don't use the value to make it possible to eventually change the function to return void. This is a good thing as pwmchip_remove() is usually called from a remove function (mostly for platform devices) and their return value is ignored by the device core anyhow. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c index 2464f7a24983..58bc75857b80 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c @@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct stm32_pwm_lp *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); - return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip); + pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip); + + return 0; } static int __maybe_unused stm32_pwm_lp_suspend(struct device *dev)