From patchwork Thu May 16 10:42:20 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 1100475 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bhelgaas@google.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454Sfn3D8Mz9s3l for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:42:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726902AbfEPKmX (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 06:42:23 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:41200 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726857AbfEPKmX (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 06:42:23 -0400 Received: from 79.184.255.148.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.255.148) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.213) id d86607e85533ac73; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:42:20 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: Linux PM , LKML , Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko Subject: [PATCH] ACPI/PCI: PM: Add missing wakeup.flags.valid checks Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:42:20 +0200 Message-ID: <2091978.9z20bSIm3T@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org From: Rafael J. Wysocki Both acpi_pci_need_resume() and acpi_dev_needs_resume() check if the current ACPI wakeup configuration of the device matches what is expected as far as system wakeup from sleep states is concerned, as reflected by the device_may_wakeup() return value for the device. However, they only should do that if wakeup.flags.valid is set for the device's ACPI companion, because otherwise the wakeup.prepare_count value for it is meaningless. Add the missing wakeup.flags.valid checks to these functions. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg --- drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 4 ++-- drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c @@ -666,7 +666,8 @@ static bool acpi_pci_need_resume(struct if (!adev || !acpi_device_power_manageable(adev)) return false; - if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) != !!adev->wakeup.prepare_count) + if (adev->wakeup.flags.valid && + device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) != !!adev->wakeup.prepare_count) return true; if (acpi_target_system_state() == ACPI_STATE_S0) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c @@ -952,8 +952,8 @@ static bool acpi_dev_needs_resume(struct u32 sys_target = acpi_target_system_state(); int ret, state; - if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev) || !adev || - device_may_wakeup(dev) != !!adev->wakeup.prepare_count) + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev) || !adev || (adev->wakeup.flags.valid && + device_may_wakeup(dev) != !!adev->wakeup.prepare_count)) return true; if (sys_target == ACPI_STATE_S0)