From patchwork Thu Mar 24 01:48:12 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Serge Semin X-Patchwork-Id: 1610346 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=baikalelectronics.ru header.i=@baikalelectronics.ru header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=pxMDwJ2d; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KRzB23pM2z9s5V for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 03:46:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243104AbiC1QqQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:46:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242943AbiC1QqE (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:46:04 -0400 Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru (mail.baikalelectronics.com [87.245.175.226]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF962251A; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru (unknown [192.168.51.25]) by mail.baikalelectronics.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FF11E493B; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:48:39 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.baikalelectronics.ru 15FF11E493B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baikalelectronics.ru; s=mail; t=1648086519; bh=qeD0LQB5yz0tEnI7peM/retOGT3xKLiWnq9l84RaXtg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pxMDwJ2d7YWS6glR8disDs7jCpmDaCgVA+5xJkDkOkmGxoz2qgRmveWL/Gu+8h+DS PVLhOsTKdCB/8/sfAGRbN9vLfWr0naiLFzI3GpZSKHllo1KcseFSI0z5btzIEztT5D 3qHlEjo6fE/SDvrCCK2B9sNCaHfz1Y1UkXRXDum8= Received: from localhost (192.168.168.10) by mail (192.168.51.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:48:38 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Gustavo Pimentel , Vinod Koul , Jingoo Han , Bjorn Helgaas , Frank Li , Manivannan Sadhasivam CC: Serge Semin , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , =?utf-8?q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , , , Subject: [PATCH 01/25] dmaengine: dw-edma: Drop dma_slave_config.direction field usage Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:48:12 +0300 Message-ID: <20220324014836.19149-2-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> In-Reply-To: <20220324014836.19149-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> References: <20220324014836.19149-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: MAIL.baikal.int (192.168.51.25) To mail (192.168.51.25) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org The dma_slave_config.direction field usage in the DW eDMA driver has been introduced in the commit bd96f1b2f43a ("dmaengine: dw-edma: support local dma device transfer semantics"). Mainly the change introduced there was correct (indeed DEV_TO_MEM means using RD-channel and MEM_TO_DEV - WR-channel for the case of having eDMA accessed locally from CPU/Application side), but providing an additional MEM_TO_MEM/DEV_TO_DEV-based semantics was quite redundant if not to say potentially harmful (when it comes to removing the denoted field). First of all since the dma_slave_config.direction field has been marked as obsolete (see [1] and the structure dc [2]) and will be discarded in future, using it especially in a non-standard way is discouraged. Secondly in accordance with the commit denoted above the default dw_edma_device_transfer() semantics has been changed despite what it's message said. So claiming that the method was left backward compatible was wrong. Anyway let's fix the problems denoted above and simplify the dw_edma_device_transfer() method by dropping the parsing of the DMA-channel direction field. Instead of having that implicit dma_slave_config.direction field semantic we can use the recently added DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL flag to distinguish between the local and remote DW eDMA setups thus preserving both cases support. In addition to that an ASCII-figure has been added to clarify the complication out. [1] Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst [2] include/linux/dmaengine.h: dma_slave_config.direction Co-developed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam Signed-off-by: Serge Semin --- In accordance with agreement with Frank and Manivannan this patch is supposed to be moved to the series: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20220310192457.3090-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com/ in place of the patch: [PATCH v5 6/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Don't rely on the deprecated "direction" member Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20220310192457.3090-7-Frank.Li@nxp.com/ --- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c index 5be8a5944714..e9e32ed74aa9 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c @@ -339,21 +339,40 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer) if (!chan->configured) return NULL; - switch (chan->config.direction) { - case DMA_DEV_TO_MEM: /* local DMA */ - if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ) - break; - return NULL; - case DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: /* local DMA */ - if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) - break; - return NULL; - default: /* remote DMA */ - if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ) - break; - if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) - break; - return NULL; + /* + * Local Root Port/End-point Remote End-point + * +-----------------------+ PCIe bus +----------------------+ + * | | +-+ | | + * | DEV_TO_MEM Rx Ch <----+ +---+ Tx Ch DEV_TO_MEM | + * | | | | | | + * | MEM_TO_DEV Tx Ch +----+ +---> Rx Ch MEM_TO_DEV | + * | | +-+ | | + * +-----------------------+ +----------------------+ + * + * 1. Normal logic: + * If eDMA is embedded into the DW PCIe RP/EP and controlled from the + * CPU/Application side, the Rx channel (EDMA_DIR_READ) will be used + * for the device read operations (DEV_TO_MEM) and the Tx channel + * (EDMA_DIR_WRITE) - for the write operations (MEM_TO_DEV). + * + * 2. Inverted logic: + * If eDMA is embedded into a Remote PCIe EP and is controlled by the + * MWr/MRd TLPs sent from the CPU's PCIe host controller, the Tx + * channel (EDMA_DIR_WRITE) will be used for the device read operations + * (DEV_TO_MEM) and the Rx channel (EDMA_DIR_READ) - for the write + * operations (MEM_TO_DEV). + * + * It is the client driver responsibility to choose a proper channel + * for the DMA transfers. + */ + if (chan->dw->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL) { + if ((chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ && dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) || + (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)) + return NULL; + } else { + if ((chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE && dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) || + (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)) + return NULL; } if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_CYCLIC) {