From patchwork Thu Mar 24 01:37:30 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Serge Semin X-Patchwork-Id: 1610269 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=baikalelectronics.ru header.i=@baikalelectronics.ru header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Qofvpoac; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KRxM90cyyz9sCq for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 02:24:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237471AbiC1P0L (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:26:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45328 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237134AbiC1PZ4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:25:56 -0400 Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru (mail.baikalelectronics.com [87.245.175.226]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465D321E3E; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru (unknown [192.168.51.25]) by mail.baikalelectronics.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A53A1E492B; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:37:58 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.baikalelectronics.ru 1A53A1E492B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baikalelectronics.ru; s=mail; t=1648085878; bh=pcwhlvPohQh7Qat7puGKhGpj8aOlAc8s7r4TSh7jh6g=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Qofvpoaczg/USv9QkltORohpkUn73JYO/HXrOJPCpThzlqVbvehD9Y3KWq+fex9Ru IUq4uG3a1xrtPc6jrY/ePmo3e78fHi7vKzRWrrE8Q1n6d/cIvA8+wSdnA4hwKI2zMA 4if/dyDmHxVnC5WVhzlQ4/OjeL2tWKaJclRw1sWQ= Received: from localhost (192.168.168.10) by mail (192.168.51.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:37:57 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Jingoo Han , Gustavo Pimentel , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , =?utf-8?q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= CC: Serge Semin , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Frank Li , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Rob Herring , , , Subject: [PATCH 12/16] PCI: dwc: Verify in/out regions against iATU constraints Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:37:30 +0300 Message-ID: <20220324013734.18234-13-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> In-Reply-To: <20220324013734.18234-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> References: <20220324013734.18234-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: MAIL.baikal.int (192.168.51.25) To mail (192.168.51.25) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Since the DWC PCIe driver private data now contains the iATU inbound and outbound regions constraints info like alignment, minimum and maximum limits, we can use them to make the in- and outbound iATU regions setup methods more strict to the ranges a callee tries to specify. That will give us the safer dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(), dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu() and dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() functions. First of all let's update the outbound ATU entries setup methods to returning the operation status. The methods will fail either in case if the range is failed to be activated or the passed region doesn't fulfill iATU constraints. Secondly the passed to the dw_pcie_prog_{ep_}outbound_atu() methods region-related parameters are verified against the detected iATU regions constraints. In particular the region limit address must not overflow the lower/upper limit CSR RW-fields otherwise the specified range will be just silently clamped. That verification will also protect the code from having u64 type overflow. Secondly let's make sure base address (CPU-address), target address (PCI-address) and size are properly aligned. Unaligned ranges will be silently aligned down (addresses) and up (limit) on writing the values to the corresponding registers, which in it turn may lead to unpredictable results like ranges virtual overlap. Finally the CPU-address alignment needs to be verified in the dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() method too as the DWC PCIe RC/EP registers manual demands seeing the lower bits of the in- and outbound iATU base address are always zeros. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 39 +++++++++++++------- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 10 ++--- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c index c218b1fe4dad..2a7f23a2045c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ * Author: Jingoo Han */ +#include #include #include #include @@ -311,9 +312,9 @@ static inline u32 dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(u32 val) return val | PCIE_ATU_TD; } -static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, - int index, int type, u64 cpu_addr, - u64 pci_addr, u64 size) +static int __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, + int index, int type, u64 cpu_addr, + u64 pci_addr, u64 size) { u32 retries, val; u64 limit_addr; @@ -323,6 +324,13 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, limit_addr = cpu_addr + size - 1; + if ((limit_addr & ~pci->region_limit) != (cpu_addr & ~pci->region_limit) || + !IS_ALIGNED(cpu_addr, pci->region_align) || + !IS_ALIGNED(pci_addr, pci->region_align) || + !IS_ALIGNED(size, pci->region_align) || !size) { + return -EINVAL; + } + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ob(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr)); dw_pcie_writel_atu_ob(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE, @@ -356,27 +364,29 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, for (retries = 0; retries < LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES; retries++) { val = dw_pcie_readl_atu_ob(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_REGION_CTRL2); if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) - return; + return 0; mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); } dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); + + return -ETIMEDOUT; } -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, - u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) +int dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, + u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) { - __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, 0, index, type, - cpu_addr, pci_addr, size); + return __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, 0, index, type, + cpu_addr, pci_addr, size); } -void dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, - int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, - u64 size) +int dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, + u64 size) { - __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, func_no, index, type, - cpu_addr, pci_addr, size); + return __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, func_no, index, type, + cpu_addr, pci_addr, size); } static inline u32 dw_pcie_readl_atu_ib(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 region, u32 reg) @@ -395,6 +405,9 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, { u32 retries, val; + if (!IS_ALIGNED(cpu_addr, pci->region_align)) + return -EINVAL; + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr)); dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET, diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h index 8b601a6a6090..bcda63393390 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h @@ -304,12 +304,10 @@ void dw_pcie_write_dbi2(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg, size_t size, u32 val); int dw_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci); void dw_pcie_upconfig_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci); int dw_pcie_wait_for_link(struct dw_pcie *pci); -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, - int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, - u64 size); -void dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, - int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, - u64 size); +int dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, + u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size); +int dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size); int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index, int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar); void dw_pcie_disable_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 dir, int index);