| Message ID | 20210930142556.9999-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/1] driver core: use NUMA_NO_NODE during device_initialize | expand |
Hi Max, > Don't use (-1) constant for setting initial device node. Instead, use > the generic NUMA_NO_NODE definition to indicate that "no node id > specified". > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/base/core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c > index e65dd803a453..2b4b46f6c676 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/core.c > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c > @@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ void device_initialize(struct device *dev) > spin_lock_init(&dev->devres_lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->devres_head); > device_pm_init(dev); > - set_dev_node(dev, -1); > + set_dev_node(dev, NUMA_NO_NODE); We might have one of these to fix in the PCI tree, as per: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15-rc3/source/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c#L84 Would this be of interest to you for a potential v2? Krzysztof
On 9/30/2021 5:41 PM, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote: > Hi Max, > >> Don't use (-1) constant for setting initial device node. Instead, use >> the generic NUMA_NO_NODE definition to indicate that "no node id >> specified". >> >> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >> --- >> drivers/base/core.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c >> index e65dd803a453..2b4b46f6c676 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c >> @@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ void device_initialize(struct device *dev) >> spin_lock_init(&dev->devres_lock); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->devres_head); >> device_pm_init(dev); >> - set_dev_node(dev, -1); >> + set_dev_node(dev, NUMA_NO_NODE); > We might have one of these to fix in the PCI tree, as per: > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15-rc3/source/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c#L84 > > Would this be of interest to you for a potential v2? sure no problem. Lets get some reviews first and then I'll send v2 with this patch as well. > Krzysztof
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:25:56PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > Don't use (-1) constant for setting initial device node. Instead, use > the generic NUMA_NO_NODE definition to indicate that "no node id > specified". > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/base/core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Thanks! Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c index e65dd803a453..2b4b46f6c676 100644 --- a/drivers/base/core.c +++ b/drivers/base/core.c @@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ void device_initialize(struct device *dev) spin_lock_init(&dev->devres_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->devres_head); device_pm_init(dev); - set_dev_node(dev, -1); + set_dev_node(dev, NUMA_NO_NODE); #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ raw_spin_lock_init(&dev->msi_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->msi_list);
Don't use (-1) constant for setting initial device node. Instead, use the generic NUMA_NO_NODE definition to indicate that "no node id specified". Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> --- drivers/base/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)