diff mbox series

[v10,6/8] PCI: Setup ACPI fwnode early and at the same time with OF

Message ID 20210709123813.8700-7-ameynarkhede03@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series Expose and manage PCI device reset | expand

Commit Message

Amey Narkhede July 9, 2021, 12:38 p.m. UTC
From: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>

The pci_dev objects are created through two mechanisms 1) during PCI
bus scan and 2) from I/O Virtualization. The fwnode in pci_dev object
is being set at different places depends on the type of firmware used,
device creation mechanism, and acpi_pci_bridge_d3() WAR.

The software features which have a dependency on ACPI fwnode properties
and need to be handled before device_add() will not work. One use case,
the software has to check the existence of _RST method to support ACPI
based reset method.

This patch does the two changes in order to provide fwnode consistently.
 - Set ACPI and OF fwnodes from pci_setup_device().
 - Remove pci_set_acpi_fwnode() in acpi_pci_bridge_d3().

After this patch, ACPI/OF firmware properties are visible at the same
time during the early stage of pci_dev setup. And also call sites should
be able to use firmware agnostic functions device_property_xxx() for the
early PCI quirks in the future.

Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 1 -
 drivers/pci/probe.c    | 7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Alex Williamson July 12, 2021, 11:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri,  9 Jul 2021 18:08:11 +0530
Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
> 
> The pci_dev objects are created through two mechanisms 1) during PCI
> bus scan and 2) from I/O Virtualization. The fwnode in pci_dev object
> is being set at different places depends on the type of firmware used,
> device creation mechanism, and acpi_pci_bridge_d3() WAR.
> 
> The software features which have a dependency on ACPI fwnode properties
> and need to be handled before device_add() will not work. One use case,
> the software has to check the existence of _RST method to support ACPI
> based reset method.
> 
> This patch does the two changes in order to provide fwnode consistently.
>  - Set ACPI and OF fwnodes from pci_setup_device().
>  - Remove pci_set_acpi_fwnode() in acpi_pci_bridge_d3().
> 
> After this patch, ACPI/OF firmware properties are visible at the same
> time during the early stage of pci_dev setup. And also call sites should
> be able to use firmware agnostic functions device_property_xxx() for the
> early PCI quirks in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 1 -
>  drivers/pci/probe.c    | 7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Looks ok to me.

Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Bjorn Helgaas July 27, 2021, 11:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 06:08:11PM +0530, Amey Narkhede wrote:
> From: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
> 
> The pci_dev objects are created through two mechanisms 1) during PCI
> bus scan and 2) from I/O Virtualization. The fwnode in pci_dev object
> is being set at different places depends on the type of firmware used,
> device creation mechanism, and acpi_pci_bridge_d3() WAR.

WAR?

> The software features which have a dependency on ACPI fwnode properties
> and need to be handled before device_add() will not work. One use case,
> the software has to check the existence of _RST method to support ACPI
> based reset method.
> 
> This patch does the two changes in order to provide fwnode consistently.
>  - Set ACPI and OF fwnodes from pci_setup_device().
>  - Remove pci_set_acpi_fwnode() in acpi_pci_bridge_d3().
> 
> After this patch, ACPI/OF firmware properties are visible at the same
> time during the early stage of pci_dev setup. And also call sites should
> be able to use firmware agnostic functions device_property_xxx() for the
> early PCI quirks in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 1 -
>  drivers/pci/probe.c    | 7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index eaddbf701..dae021322 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -952,7 +952,6 @@ static bool acpi_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* Assume D3 support if the bridge is power-manageable by ACPI. */
> -	pci_set_acpi_fwnode(dev);
>  	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
>  
>  	if (adev && acpi_device_power_manageable(adev))
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index c272e23db..c911d6a5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1790,6 +1790,9 @@ int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
>  	set_pcie_port_type(dev);
>  
> +	pci_set_of_node(dev);
> +	pci_set_acpi_fwnode(dev);
> +
>  	pci_dev_assign_slot(dev);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1925,6 +1928,7 @@ int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	default:				    /* unknown header */
>  		pci_err(dev, "unknown header type %02x, ignoring device\n",
>  			dev->hdr_type);
> +		pci_release_of_node(dev);
>  		return -EIO;
>  
>  	bad:
> @@ -2352,10 +2356,7 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
>  	dev->vendor = l & 0xffff;
>  	dev->device = (l >> 16) & 0xffff;
>  
> -	pci_set_of_node(dev);
> -
>  	if (pci_setup_device(dev)) {
> -		pci_release_of_node(dev);
>  		pci_bus_put(dev->bus);
>  		kfree(dev);
>  		return NULL;
> -- 
> 2.32.0
>
Shanker Donthineni July 27, 2021, 11:50 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Bjorn

On 7/27/21 6:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> From: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
>>
>> The pci_dev objects are created through two mechanisms 1) during PCI
>> bus scan and 2) from I/O Virtualization. The fwnode in pci_dev object
>> is being set at different places depends on the type of firmware used,
>> device creation mechanism, and acpi_pci_bridge_d3() WAR.
> WAR?
>
Thanks for catching a mistake, will remove it in the next patch.

-Shanker
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
index eaddbf701..dae021322 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -952,7 +952,6 @@  static bool acpi_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		return false;
 
 	/* Assume D3 support if the bridge is power-manageable by ACPI. */
-	pci_set_acpi_fwnode(dev);
 	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
 
 	if (adev && acpi_device_power_manageable(adev))
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index c272e23db..c911d6a5c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1790,6 +1790,9 @@  int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
 	set_pcie_port_type(dev);
 
+	pci_set_of_node(dev);
+	pci_set_acpi_fwnode(dev);
+
 	pci_dev_assign_slot(dev);
 
 	/*
@@ -1925,6 +1928,7 @@  int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	default:				    /* unknown header */
 		pci_err(dev, "unknown header type %02x, ignoring device\n",
 			dev->hdr_type);
+		pci_release_of_node(dev);
 		return -EIO;
 
 	bad:
@@ -2352,10 +2356,7 @@  static struct pci_dev *pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
 	dev->vendor = l & 0xffff;
 	dev->device = (l >> 16) & 0xffff;
 
-	pci_set_of_node(dev);
-
 	if (pci_setup_device(dev)) {
-		pci_release_of_node(dev);
 		pci_bus_put(dev->bus);
 		kfree(dev);
 		return NULL;