diff mbox series

[v2] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Simplify single/double data register access

Message ID c3b2a8d1a69f1b1e8d1a460148406cfb83e52eb4.1649857740.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series [v2] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Simplify single/double data register access | expand

Commit Message

Geert Uytterhoeven April 13, 2022, 1:49 p.m. UTC 
For manual write and read, factor out the common access to the first
data register by keeping track of the current data pointer.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
v2:
  - Add Tested-by, Reviewed-by,
  - Remove unneeded pointer post-increments from final dereferences.
---
 drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski April 14, 2022, 7:28 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 13/04/2022 15:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> For manual write and read, factor out the common access to the first
> data register by keeping track of the current data pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

This does not apply on a next branch. Maybe because I put "memory:
renesas-rpc-if: Fix HF/OSPI data transfer in Manual Mode" for fixes?
Does this patch depend on that fix?


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Geert Uytterhoeven April 14, 2022, 7:41 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 9:28 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13/04/2022 15:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > For manual write and read, factor out the common access to the first
> > data register by keeping track of the current data pointer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> This does not apply on a next branch. Maybe because I put "memory:
> renesas-rpc-if: Fix HF/OSPI data transfer in Manual Mode" for fixes?
> Does this patch depend on that fix?

There is no functional dependency, but a slight contextual one.
It should apply with some fuzz:

$ git am --show-current-patch | patch -p1
patching file drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 458 (offset -30 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 471 with fuzz 1 (offset -31 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 515 (offset -31 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 531 (offset -32 lines).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Krzysztof Kozlowski April 14, 2022, 7:46 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:49:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> For manual write and read, factor out the common access to the first
> data register by keeping track of the current data pointer.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Simplify single/double data register access
      commit: 1f26a60b55aa654c73b5b9eb9eab8a7d687d429d


You can double check if hunks matched correctly:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl.git/commit/?h=mem-ctrl-next&id=1f26a60b55aa654c73b5b9eb9eab8a7d687d429d

Best regards,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c b/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
index 019a0822bde0e413..ba9c526833c0f4da 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@  int rpcif_manual_xfer(struct rpcif *rpc)
 	case RPCIF_DATA_OUT:
 		while (pos < rpc->xferlen) {
 			u32 bytes_left = rpc->xferlen - pos;
-			u32 nbytes, data[2];
+			u32 nbytes, data[2], *p = data;
 
 			smcr = rpc->smcr | RPCIF_SMCR_SPIE;
 
@@ -502,15 +502,9 @@  int rpcif_manual_xfer(struct rpcif *rpc)
 			rpc->xfer_size = nbytes;
 
 			memcpy(data, rpc->buffer + pos, nbytes);
-			if (nbytes == 8) {
-				regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMWDR1,
-					     data[0]);
-				regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMWDR0,
-					     data[1]);
-			} else {
-				regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMWDR0,
-					     data[0]);
-			}
+			if (nbytes == 8)
+				regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMWDR1, *p++);
+			regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMWDR0, *p);
 
 			regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMCR, smcr);
 			ret = wait_msg_xfer_end(rpc);
@@ -552,7 +546,7 @@  int rpcif_manual_xfer(struct rpcif *rpc)
 		}
 		while (pos < rpc->xferlen) {
 			u32 bytes_left = rpc->xferlen - pos;
-			u32 nbytes, data[2];
+			u32 nbytes, data[2], *p = data;
 
 			/* nbytes may only be 1, 2, 4, or 8 */
 			nbytes = bytes_left >= max ? max : (1 << ilog2(bytes_left));
@@ -569,15 +563,9 @@  int rpcif_manual_xfer(struct rpcif *rpc)
 			if (ret)
 				goto err_out;
 
-			if (nbytes == 8) {
-				regmap_read(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMRDR1,
-					    &data[0]);
-				regmap_read(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMRDR0,
-					    &data[1]);
-			} else {
-				regmap_read(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMRDR0,
-					    &data[0]);
-			}
+			if (nbytes == 8)
+				regmap_read(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMRDR1, p++);
+			regmap_read(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMRDR0, p);
 			memcpy(rpc->buffer + pos, data, nbytes);
 
 			pos += nbytes;