| Message ID | 20230622212415.3583886-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Delegated to: | Miquel Raynal |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: mtd: Fix nand-controller.yaml license | expand |
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:24:15PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Binding files should be dual licensed, this file was writtent with the > idea in mind of following the rules, but the SPDX tag did not reflect > that correctly. Fix the tag so we are sure this file is licensed > correctly. Yes, we do want dual license, but things converted from txt bindings need those authors' permission as the txt bindings are all implicitly GPLv2. That didn't happen here, so we kept the default implicit license. Looks like this case is all Bootlin authors for significant parts of the original txt binding, so you should be good on that part (assuming your employer agrees). Maxime did the schema, so need his permission too. Note I have blanket permission on dual licensing from several companies for DT files. It would be nice to get the same from Bootlin. Rob
Hello Rob, On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:05:08 -0600 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > Yes, we do want dual license, but things converted from txt bindings > need those authors' permission as the txt bindings are all implicitly > GPLv2. That didn't happen here, so we kept the default implicit license. > Looks like this case is all Bootlin authors for significant parts of the > original txt binding, so you should be good on that part (assuming your > employer agrees). Maxime did the schema, so need his permission too. > > Note I have blanket permission on dual licensing from several companies > for DT files. It would be nice to get the same from Bootlin. I hereby allow the relicensing of all contributions from Bootlin employees on Device Tree binding documents in the Linux kernel from GPLv2 to GPLv2 or BSD-2-Clause. Let me know if this statement is sufficient or if you need anything more formal or specific. Best regards, Thomas Petazzoni
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 03:05:08PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:24:15PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Binding files should be dual licensed, this file was writtent with the > > idea in mind of following the rules, but the SPDX tag did not reflect > > that correctly. Fix the tag so we are sure this file is licensed > > correctly. > > Yes, we do want dual license, but things converted from txt bindings > need those authors' permission as the txt bindings are all implicitly > GPLv2. That didn't happen here, so we kept the default implicit license. > Looks like this case is all Bootlin authors for significant parts of the > original txt binding, so you should be good on that part (assuming your > employer agrees). Maxime did the schema, so need his permission too. I'm not sure how redundant it is with what Thomas just said, but for that patch and any license change from GPL to GPL+BSD-2-Clause: Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Maxime
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml index 83a4fe4cc29d..28167c0cf271 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2 --- $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/nand-controller.yaml#
Binding files should be dual licensed, this file was writtent with the idea in mind of following the rules, but the SPDX tag did not reflect that correctly. Fix the tag so we are sure this file is licensed correctly. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)