diff mbox series

[v6,03/15] ubifs: Fix wrong number of inodes locked by ui_mutex in ubifs_inode comment

Message ID 20211227032246.2886878-4-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series Some bugfixs for ubi/ubifs | expand

Commit Message

Zhihao Cheng Dec. 27, 2021, 3:22 a.m. UTC 
Since 9ec64962afb1702f75b("ubifs: Implement RENAME_EXCHANGE") and
9e0a1fff8db56eaaebb("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") are applied,
ubifs_rename locks and changes 4 ubifs inodes, correct the comment
for ui_mutex in ubifs_inode.

Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
index c38066ce9ab0..972e41daff01 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
+++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@  struct ubifs_gced_idx_leb {
  * @ui_mutex exists for two main reasons. At first it prevents inodes from
  * being written back while UBIFS changing them, being in the middle of an VFS
  * operation. This way UBIFS makes sure the inode fields are consistent. For
- * example, in 'ubifs_rename()' we change 3 inodes simultaneously, and
+ * example, in 'ubifs_rename()' we change 4 inodes simultaneously, and
  * write-back must not write any of them before we have finished.
  *
  * The second reason is budgeting - UBIFS has to budget all operations. If an