Message ID | 20211025034116.3544321-4-chengzhihao1@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=0LMxtY9N; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hd0nG5SLcz9sRR for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:29:38 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gikW1s+wzp1Sg7oqaaVvfLpchXurlhfgimdZrHfR+FQ=; b=0LMxtY9NKjFyWa S9pliNbTGOaeDGCasyY1R41HSiqYKl8y8+AiDywg+dDuHa6jS8iJ/kiewBCPu8VGmd4eOMVoPHwa5 bl8v9Y7v1BIDor18WNfEXHAE7d3srjmJGbHLFdNQ0Cox27e0VEDU6juPNxjDGRPwm4eTsnbYu8Xlt eIB5umTNEuNzg2bAPROjuIu0DeZ5YLEAA1uYXLf8dyIrF8xj7Cg7540upyUA8kbs1Bhis+xkzPKwl qxtzkszFjf7Jn1P51MSBbsePOUj8baEfTGOSaVkTubf7CuiCNvCw5mL/RzfazOHyoUI2J41nWE8N9 7ews4yu/tBe+10o8ODSQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1meqf3-00F7v6-LY; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 03:28:33 +0000 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1meqf0-00F7sL-Ry for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 03:28:32 +0000 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Hd0jg6ccgz1DHrF; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:26:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema761-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.203) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.15; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:28:24 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggema761-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.15; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:28:23 +0800 From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> To: <richard@nod.at>, <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>, <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> CC: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH 03/11] ubifs: Fix wrong number of inodes locked by ui_mutex in ubifs_inode comment Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:41:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20211025034116.3544321-4-chengzhihao1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20211025034116.3544321-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com> References: <20211025034116.3544321-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggema761-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.203) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211024_202831_161215_1B444904 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.62 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Since 9ec64962afb1702f75b("ubifs: Implement RENAME_EXCHANGE") and 9e0a1fff8db56eaaebb("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") are applied, ubifs_rename locks and changes 4 ubifs inodes, correct the commen [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [45.249.212.255 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [45.249.212.255 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
Some bugfixs for ubifs/ubi
|
expand
|
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h index c38066ce9ab0..972e41daff01 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h +++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ struct ubifs_gced_idx_leb { * @ui_mutex exists for two main reasons. At first it prevents inodes from * being written back while UBIFS changing them, being in the middle of an VFS * operation. This way UBIFS makes sure the inode fields are consistent. For - * example, in 'ubifs_rename()' we change 3 inodes simultaneously, and + * example, in 'ubifs_rename()' we change 4 inodes simultaneously, and * write-back must not write any of them before we have finished. * * The second reason is budgeting - UBIFS has to budget all operations. If an
Since 9ec64962afb1702f75b("ubifs: Implement RENAME_EXCHANGE") and 9e0a1fff8db56eaaebb("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") are applied, ubifs_rename locks and changes 4 ubifs inodes, correct the comment for ui_mutex in ubifs_inode. Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> --- fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)