Message ID | 20200917041136.178600-9-ebiggers@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1231::1; helo=merlin.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=OHI5/+ke; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=rBiN5rds; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BsNrj0gW0z9sSC for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:14:13 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=CE28vl2cYUS6o0c2Ef1E178LGay0pbj2audtem8oQ5k=; b=OHI5/+ke35lZsuX52zYT2g03t 80uhusEh5CWOXGrHERDAdMcPZ9KAWA6Sy8oXTAZRwpkv4VJjY5t1zdOBi79uXax9tZnU79/OAYHeE MUQsefh2d9qKpm9LiYe/0QtCPJGGpbZpn7TkqlHiISH8g2NZKo8Xg+nYygyr/9Hik8ZyrA1KDmMRC /V7ouCdJo45FEet9TKYoMV3Cd8YcZs9ofWc7KRHc6mYKMt9TCRejj0siVuspmPMBxT3boJUAMgnpU IHhIM7bQXyJizJJXp0zoASNJzMA5nB6+N+x0w9Obzt9Q6T9USLzCmk0H5jLceUfAd8/aTvihRhask JgkziFkPQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIlId-0001Mk-9b; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:35 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIlIF-0001Eu-8Q for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:14 +0000 Received: from sol.attlocal.net (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29B3521D7F; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 04:13:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600315990; bh=ZzMv1pUhY0NvnbJHjrS2ra7ESt6vtXPBJHTWIdsGFCY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rBiN5rdstflHX1It/vJX6MDn0Ra/3t+jyzeqs5yBDq9mOlzDoS5YBNrAfmfXthztF I7/1sT0nuq74DNCTvjM6CzObqwT702hidEHtOiXnpFWbZ0K0C5eA4q7LTCh4pikwvV 0QSOSfG7cfsP3i34K7E+BadmEiPvsm9a882Jz/NE= From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 08/13] fscrypt: require that fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() already has key Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:11:31 -0700 Message-Id: <20200917041136.178600-9-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200917041136.178600-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20200917041136.178600-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200917_001311_408215_A625CCEC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.10 ) X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-8.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.145.29.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -3.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
fscrypt: improve file creation flow
|
expand
|
diff --git a/fs/crypto/hooks.c b/fs/crypto/hooks.c index 491b252843eb9..7748db5092409 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/hooks.c +++ b/fs/crypto/hooks.c @@ -217,9 +217,13 @@ int __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink(struct inode *inode, const char *target, struct fscrypt_symlink_data *sd; unsigned int ciphertext_len; - err = fscrypt_require_key(inode); - if (err) - return err; + /* + * fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() should have already set up the new + * symlink inode's encryption key. We don't wait until now to do it, + * since we may be in a filesystem transaction now. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode))) + return -ENOKEY; if (disk_link->name) { /* filesystem-provided buffer */