Message ID | 1426493714-3748-1-git-send-email-vndao@altera.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Hi Viet, On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:15:14AM -0700, vndao@altera.com wrote: > From: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@altera.com> > > This patch introduces a properly-replaceable spi_nor callback that does > flash specific lock and unlock. The existing code for spi_nor_lock and > spi_nor_unlock is moved into their own functions which are stm_lock and > stm_unlock. I'm curious; is this a complete ripoff of my code [1]? You haven't credited my authorship at all. That's a big no-no. Typically you keep the 'From:' and Signed-off-by of the original author if you're going to modify/redistribute it. (Admittedly, I didn't provide the S-o-b on my informal patch.) Anyway, that's all fine this time, but please avoid doing this in the future; I can fix up the authorship, etc., and apply it, if it gets an Ack/Tested-by from one or more reviewers (e.g., you). BTW, I hope you at least tested this, right? Brian [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-March/058301.html > Signed-off-by: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@altera.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index b6a5a0c..43bb552 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -369,17 +369,13 @@ erase_err: > return ret; > } > > -static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > { > - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; > uint32_t offset = ofs; > uint8_t status_old, status_new; > int ret = 0; > > - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > status_old = read_sr(nor); > > if (offset < mtd->size - (mtd->size / 2)) > @@ -402,26 +398,18 @@ static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { > write_enable(nor); > ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); > - if (ret) > - goto err; > } > > -err: > - spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > return ret; > } > > -static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > { > - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; > uint32_t offset = ofs; > uint8_t status_old, status_new; > int ret = 0; > > - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > status_old = read_sr(nor); > > if (offset+len > mtd->size - (mtd->size / 64)) > @@ -444,15 +432,41 @@ static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { > write_enable(nor); > ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); > - if (ret) > - goto err; > } > > -err: > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +{ > + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + int ret; > + > + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nor->flash_lock(nor, ofs, len); > + > spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); > return ret; > } > > +static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +{ > + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + int ret; > + > + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nor->flash_unlock(nor, ofs, len); > + > + spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > + return ret; > +} > + > /* Used when the "_ext_id" is two bytes at most */ > #define INFO(_jedec_id, _ext_id, _sector_size, _n_sectors, _flags) \ > ((kernel_ulong_t)&(struct flash_info) { \ > @@ -1045,6 +1059,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, enum read_mode mode) > > /* nor protection support for STmicro chips */ > if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == CFI_MFR_ST) { > + nor->flash_lock = stm_lock; > + nor->flash_unlock = stm_unlock; > + } > + if (nor->flash_lock && nor->flash_unlock) { > mtd->_lock = spi_nor_lock; > mtd->_unlock = spi_nor_unlock; > } > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > index 4720b86..e4e73d5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags { > * @write: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] write data to the SPI NOR > * @erase: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] erase a sector of the SPI NOR > * at the offset @offs > + * @lock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] lock a region of the SPI NOR > + * @unlock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] unlock a region of the SPI NOR > * @priv: the private data > */ > struct spi_nor { > @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ struct spi_nor { > void (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, > size_t len, size_t *retlen, const u_char *write_buf); > int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs); > + int (*flash_lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); > + int (*flash_unlock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); > > void *priv; > }; > -- > 1.7.11.GIT >
Hi Brian, On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Viet, > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:15:14AM -0700, vndao@altera.com wrote: >> From: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@altera.com> >> >> This patch introduces a properly-replaceable spi_nor callback that does >> flash specific lock and unlock. The existing code for spi_nor_lock and >> spi_nor_unlock is moved into their own functions which are stm_lock and >> stm_unlock. > > I'm curious; is this a complete ripoff of my code [1]? You haven't > credited my authorship at all. That's a big no-no. Typically you keep > the 'From:' and Signed-off-by of the original author if you're going to > modify/redistribute it. (Admittedly, I didn't provide the S-o-b on my > informal patch.) > > Anyway, that's all fine this time, but please avoid doing this in the > future; I can fix up the authorship, etc., and apply it, if it gets an > Ack/Tested-by from one or more reviewers (e.g., you). BTW, I hope you at > least tested this, right? > > Brian Hi Brian, I am so sorry for this mistake. it is not my intention. :( I am new to kernel driver and up-streaming thing, that is why i do not know the proper way. Yes, please change the authorship to you. Yes, i tested it. > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-March/058301.html > >> Signed-off-by: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@altera.com> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> index b6a5a0c..43bb552 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> @@ -369,17 +369,13 @@ erase_err: >> return ret; >> } >> >> -static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> +static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> { >> - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); >> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; >> uint32_t offset = ofs; >> uint8_t status_old, status_new; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> - >> status_old = read_sr(nor); >> >> if (offset < mtd->size - (mtd->size / 2)) >> @@ -402,26 +398,18 @@ static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { >> write_enable(nor); >> ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); >> - if (ret) >> - goto err; >> } >> >> -err: >> - spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); >> return ret; >> } >> >> -static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> +static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> { >> - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); >> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; >> uint32_t offset = ofs; >> uint8_t status_old, status_new; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> - >> status_old = read_sr(nor); >> >> if (offset+len > mtd->size - (mtd->size / 64)) >> @@ -444,15 +432,41 @@ static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { >> write_enable(nor); >> ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); >> - if (ret) >> - goto err; >> } >> >> -err: >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> +{ >> + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = nor->flash_lock(nor, ofs, len); >> + >> spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) >> +{ >> + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = nor->flash_unlock(nor, ofs, len); >> + >> + spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> /* Used when the "_ext_id" is two bytes at most */ >> #define INFO(_jedec_id, _ext_id, _sector_size, _n_sectors, _flags) \ >> ((kernel_ulong_t)&(struct flash_info) { \ >> @@ -1045,6 +1059,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, enum read_mode mode) >> >> /* nor protection support for STmicro chips */ >> if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == CFI_MFR_ST) { >> + nor->flash_lock = stm_lock; >> + nor->flash_unlock = stm_unlock; >> + } >> + if (nor->flash_lock && nor->flash_unlock) { >> mtd->_lock = spi_nor_lock; >> mtd->_unlock = spi_nor_unlock; >> } >> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h >> index 4720b86..e4e73d5 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h >> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags { >> * @write: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] write data to the SPI NOR >> * @erase: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] erase a sector of the SPI NOR >> * at the offset @offs >> + * @lock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] lock a region of the SPI NOR >> + * @unlock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] unlock a region of the SPI NOR >> * @priv: the private data >> */ >> struct spi_nor { >> @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ struct spi_nor { >> void (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, >> size_t len, size_t *retlen, const u_char *write_buf); >> int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs); >> + int (*flash_lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); >> + int (*flash_unlock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); >> >> void *priv; >> }; >> -- >> 1.7.11.GIT >>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:15:48AM +0800, Viet Nga Dao wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:15:14AM -0700, vndao@altera.com wrote: > >> From: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@altera.com> > >> > >> This patch introduces a properly-replaceable spi_nor callback that does > >> flash specific lock and unlock. The existing code for spi_nor_lock and > >> spi_nor_unlock is moved into their own functions which are stm_lock and > >> stm_unlock. > > > > I'm curious; is this a complete ripoff of my code [1]? You haven't > > credited my authorship at all. That's a big no-no. Typically you keep > > the 'From:' and Signed-off-by of the original author if you're going to > > modify/redistribute it. (Admittedly, I didn't provide the S-o-b on my > > informal patch.) > > > > Anyway, that's all fine this time, but please avoid doing this in the > > future; I can fix up the authorship, etc., and apply it, if it gets an > > Ack/Tested-by from one or more reviewers (e.g., you). BTW, I hope you at > > least tested this, right? > > Hi Brian, > I am so sorry for this mistake. it is not my intention. :( I am new > to kernel driver and up-streaming thing, that is why i do not know the > proper way. Yes, please change the authorship to you. > Yes, i tested it. OK, no worries. Applied my own version (only differed by whitespace) and added your Tested-by. Brian
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index b6a5a0c..43bb552 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c @@ -369,17 +369,13 @@ erase_err: return ret; } -static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) { - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; uint32_t offset = ofs; uint8_t status_old, status_new; int ret = 0; - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); - if (ret) - return ret; - status_old = read_sr(nor); if (offset < mtd->size - (mtd->size / 2)) @@ -402,26 +398,18 @@ static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { write_enable(nor); ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); - if (ret) - goto err; } -err: - spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); return ret; } -static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) { - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; uint32_t offset = ofs; uint8_t status_old, status_new; int ret = 0; - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); - if (ret) - return ret; - status_old = read_sr(nor); if (offset+len > mtd->size - (mtd->size / 64)) @@ -444,15 +432,41 @@ static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { write_enable(nor); ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); - if (ret) - goto err; } -err: + return ret; +} + +static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); + int ret; + + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = nor->flash_lock(nor, ofs, len); + spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); return ret; } +static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); + int ret; + + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = nor->flash_unlock(nor, ofs, len); + + spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); + return ret; +} + /* Used when the "_ext_id" is two bytes at most */ #define INFO(_jedec_id, _ext_id, _sector_size, _n_sectors, _flags) \ ((kernel_ulong_t)&(struct flash_info) { \ @@ -1045,6 +1059,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, enum read_mode mode) /* nor protection support for STmicro chips */ if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == CFI_MFR_ST) { + nor->flash_lock = stm_lock; + nor->flash_unlock = stm_unlock; + } + if (nor->flash_lock && nor->flash_unlock) { mtd->_lock = spi_nor_lock; mtd->_unlock = spi_nor_unlock; } diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h index 4720b86..e4e73d5 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags { * @write: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] write data to the SPI NOR * @erase: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] erase a sector of the SPI NOR * at the offset @offs + * @lock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] lock a region of the SPI NOR + * @unlock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] unlock a region of the SPI NOR * @priv: the private data */ struct spi_nor { @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ struct spi_nor { void (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, size_t len, size_t *retlen, const u_char *write_buf); int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs); + int (*flash_lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); + int (*flash_unlock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); void *priv; };