diff mbox

[v3,1/3] mtd: nand: omap: fix ecclayout to be in sync with u-boot NAND driver

Message ID 1392622885-8415-2-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com
State Accepted
Commit eae39cb4934d3daab3ec828c5201c955b2e56af9
Headers show

Commit Message

pekon gupta Feb. 17, 2014, 7:41 a.m. UTC
Fixes: commit a919e51161b58ed7e6e663daba99ab7d558808f3
       mtd: nand: omap2: clean-up BCHx_HW and BCHx_SW ECC configurations in device_probe

Fixes ecclayout mismatch introduced in above commit for following ecc-schemes:
 - OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
 - OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
 However, this patch also touches other ecc-schemes as the fix required
 refactoring common code, into ecc-scheme specific code.

This patch aligns ecc-layout for below ecc-schemes as per reference [1],[2],[3]

 +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
 |OOB|BCH8_CODE_HW|BCH8_CODE_HW_||HAM1_CODE_HW |HAM1_CODE_HW |
 |pos|            | DETECTION_SW||(x8 device)  |(x16 device) |
 +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
 | 0 |BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK || BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK |
 | 1 |BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK || eccpos[0]   | BADBLK_MARK |
 | 2 | eccpos[0]  | eccpos[0]   || eccpos[1]   | eccpos[0]   |
 | 3 | eccpos[1]  | eccpos[1]   || eccpos[2]   | eccpos[1]   |
 | 4 | eccpos[2]  | eccpos[2]   || eccpos[3]   | eccpos[2]   |
 | 5 | eccpos[3]  | eccpos[3]   || eccpos[4]   | eccpos[3]   |
 | 6 | eccpos[4]  | eccpos[4]   || eccpos[5]   | eccpos[4]   |
 | 7 | eccpos[5]  | eccpos[5]   || eccpos[6]   | eccpos[5]   |
 | 8 | eccpos[6]  | eccpos[6]   || eccpos[7]   | eccpos[6]   |
 | 9 | eccpos[7]  | eccpos[7]   || eccpos[8]   | eccpos[7]   |
 |10 | eccpos[8]  | eccpos[8]   || eccpos[9]   | eccpos[8]   |
 |11 | eccpos[9]  | eccpos[9]   || eccpos[10]  | eccpos[9]   |
 |12 | eccpos[10] | eccpos[10]  || eccpos[11]  | eccpos[10]  |
 |13 | eccpos[11] | eccpos[11]  || oobfree[0]  | eccpos[11]  |
 |14 | eccpos[12] | eccpos[12]  || oobfree[1]  | oobfree[0]  |
 |15 | eccpos[13] | <reserved>  || oobfree[2]  | oobfree[1]  |
 +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
 |16 | eccpos[14] | eccpos[13]  || oobfree[3]  | oobfree[2]  |
 |...| [...]      | [...]       || [...]       | [...]       |
 |56 | eccpos[54] | eccpos[51]  || oobfree[43] | oobfree[42] |
 |57 | eccpos[55] | <reserved>  || oobfree[44] | oobfree[43] |
 +===+============+=============+==============+=============+
 |58 | oobfree[0] | oobfree[0]  || oobfree[45] | oobfree[44] |
 |59 | oobfree[1] | oobfree[1]  || oobfree[46] | oobfree[45] |
 |60 | oobfree[2] | oobfree[2]  || oobfree[47] | oobfree[46] |
 |61 | oobfree[3] | oobfree[3]  || oobfree[48] | oobfree[47] |
 |62 | oobfree[4] | oobfree[4]  || oobfree[49] | oobfree[48] |
 |63 | oobfree[5] | oobfree[5]  || oobfree[50] | oobfree[49] |
 +---+------------+-------------+--------------+-------------+

[1] ecc-layout expected by ROM code, as specified in SoC TRM under:
      Chapter="Initialization"
        Section="Device Initialization by ROM code"
            Sub-Section="Memory Booting"
                Heading="NAND"
                Figure="ECC Locations in NAND Spare Areas"

[2] ecc-layout updates in u-boot
    http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-November/167551.html

[3] u-boot configurations to match above ecc-layout are documented at
    https://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Linux_Core_NAND_User%27s_Guide

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13.x+
Reported-by: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@iseebcn.com>
Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

pekon gupta Feb. 17, 2014, 7:48 a.m. UTC | #1
removing  stable@vger.kernel.org from CC list.
(git send-email --suppress-cc=cc din't work for me)

>From: Gupta, Pekon
>
>Fixes: commit a919e51161b58ed7e6e663daba99ab7d558808f3
>       mtd: nand: omap2: clean-up BCHx_HW and BCHx_SW ECC configurations in device_probe
>
>Fixes ecclayout mismatch introduced in above commit for following ecc-schemes:
> - OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
> - OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
> However, this patch also touches other ecc-schemes as the fix required
> refactoring common code, into ecc-scheme specific code.
>
>This patch aligns ecc-layout for below ecc-schemes as per reference [1],[2],[3]
>
> +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
> |OOB|BCH8_CODE_HW|BCH8_CODE_HW_||HAM1_CODE_HW |HAM1_CODE_HW |
> |pos|            | DETECTION_SW||(x8 device)  |(x16 device) |
> +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
> | 0 |BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK || BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK |
> | 1 |BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK || eccpos[0]   | BADBLK_MARK |
> | 2 | eccpos[0]  | eccpos[0]   || eccpos[1]   | eccpos[0]   |
> | 3 | eccpos[1]  | eccpos[1]   || eccpos[2]   | eccpos[1]   |
> | 4 | eccpos[2]  | eccpos[2]   || eccpos[3]   | eccpos[2]   |
> | 5 | eccpos[3]  | eccpos[3]   || eccpos[4]   | eccpos[3]   |
> | 6 | eccpos[4]  | eccpos[4]   || eccpos[5]   | eccpos[4]   |
> | 7 | eccpos[5]  | eccpos[5]   || eccpos[6]   | eccpos[5]   |
> | 8 | eccpos[6]  | eccpos[6]   || eccpos[7]   | eccpos[6]   |
> | 9 | eccpos[7]  | eccpos[7]   || eccpos[8]   | eccpos[7]   |
> |10 | eccpos[8]  | eccpos[8]   || eccpos[9]   | eccpos[8]   |
> |11 | eccpos[9]  | eccpos[9]   || eccpos[10]  | eccpos[9]   |
> |12 | eccpos[10] | eccpos[10]  || eccpos[11]  | eccpos[10]  |
> |13 | eccpos[11] | eccpos[11]  || oobfree[0]  | eccpos[11]  |
> |14 | eccpos[12] | eccpos[12]  || oobfree[1]  | oobfree[0]  |
> |15 | eccpos[13] | <reserved>  || oobfree[2]  | oobfree[1]  |
> +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
> |16 | eccpos[14] | eccpos[13]  || oobfree[3]  | oobfree[2]  |
> |...| [...]      | [...]       || [...]       | [...]       |
> |56 | eccpos[54] | eccpos[51]  || oobfree[43] | oobfree[42] |
> |57 | eccpos[55] | <reserved>  || oobfree[44] | oobfree[43] |
> +===+============+=============+==============+=============+
> |58 | oobfree[0] | oobfree[0]  || oobfree[45] | oobfree[44] |
> |59 | oobfree[1] | oobfree[1]  || oobfree[46] | oobfree[45] |
> |60 | oobfree[2] | oobfree[2]  || oobfree[47] | oobfree[46] |
> |61 | oobfree[3] | oobfree[3]  || oobfree[48] | oobfree[47] |
> |62 | oobfree[4] | oobfree[4]  || oobfree[49] | oobfree[48] |
> |63 | oobfree[5] | oobfree[5]  || oobfree[50] | oobfree[49] |
> +---+------------+-------------+--------------+-------------+
>
>[1] ecc-layout expected by ROM code, as specified in SoC TRM under:
>      Chapter="Initialization"
>        Section="Device Initialization by ROM code"
>            Sub-Section="Memory Booting"
>                Heading="NAND"
>                Figure="ECC Locations in NAND Spare Areas"
>
>[2] ecc-layout updates in u-boot
>    http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-November/167551.html
>
>[3] u-boot configurations to match above ecc-layout are documented at
>    https://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Linux_Core_NAND_User%27s_Guide
>
>CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13.x+
>Reported-by: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@iseebcn.com>
>Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
>Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
>---
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>index ef4190a..34ef941 100644
>--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	int				i;
> 	dma_cap_mask_t			mask;
> 	unsigned			sig;
>+	unsigned			oob_index;
> 	struct resource			*res;
> 	struct mtd_part_parser_data	ppdata = {};
>
>@@ -1826,9 +1827,11 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 							(mtd->writesize /
> 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
> 		if (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
>-			ecclayout->eccpos[0]	= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+			oob_index		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
> 		else
>-			ecclayout->eccpos[0]	= 1;
>+			oob_index		= 1;
>+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
>+			ecclayout->eccpos[i]	= oob_index;
> 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
> 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
> 		break;
>@@ -1847,7 +1850,12 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
> 							(mtd->writesize /
> 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
>-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++) {
>+			ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
>+			if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
>+				oob_index++;
>+		}
> 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
> 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
> 		/* software bch library is used for locating errors */
>@@ -1883,7 +1891,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
> 							(mtd->writesize /
> 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
>-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
>+			ecclayout->eccpos[i]	= oob_index;
> 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
> 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
> 		/* This ECC scheme requires ELM H/W block */
>@@ -1913,7 +1923,12 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
> 							(mtd->writesize /
> 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
>-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++) {
>+			ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
>+			if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
>+				oob_index++;
>+		}
> 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
> 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
> 		/* software bch library is used for locating errors */
>@@ -1956,7 +1971,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
> 							(mtd->writesize /
> 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
>-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
>+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
>+			ecclayout->eccpos[i]	= oob_index;
> 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
> 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
> 		break;
>@@ -1975,8 +1992,6 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	/* populate remaining ECC layout data */
> 	ecclayout->oobfree->length = mtd->oobsize - (BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH +
> 							ecclayout->eccbytes);
>-	for (i = 1; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++)
>-		ecclayout->eccpos[i] = ecclayout->eccpos[0] + i;
> 	/* check if NAND device's OOB is enough to store ECC signatures */
> 	if (mtd->oobsize < (ecclayout->eccbytes + BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH)) {
> 		pr_err("not enough OOB bytes required = %d, available=%d\n",
>--
>1.8.5.1.163.gd7aced9


with regards, pekon
Albert ARIBAUD Feb. 17, 2014, 9:11 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Pekon,

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:11:23 +0530, Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com> wrote:

> Fixes: commit a919e51161b58ed7e6e663daba99ab7d558808f3
>        mtd: nand: omap2: clean-up BCHx_HW and BCHx_SW ECC configurations in device_probe
> 
> Fixes ecclayout mismatch introduced in above commit for following ecc-schemes:
>  - OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
>  - OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
>  However, this patch also touches other ecc-schemes as the fix required
>  refactoring common code, into ecc-scheme specific code.
> 
> This patch aligns ecc-layout for below ecc-schemes as per reference [1],[2],[3]
> 
>  +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
>  |OOB|BCH8_CODE_HW|BCH8_CODE_HW_||HAM1_CODE_HW |HAM1_CODE_HW |
>  |pos|            | DETECTION_SW||(x8 device)  |(x16 device) |
>  +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
>  | 0 |BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK || BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK |
>  | 1 |BADBLK_MARK | BADBLK_MARK || eccpos[0]   | BADBLK_MARK |
>  | 2 | eccpos[0]  | eccpos[0]   || eccpos[1]   | eccpos[0]   |
>  | 3 | eccpos[1]  | eccpos[1]   || eccpos[2]   | eccpos[1]   |
>  | 4 | eccpos[2]  | eccpos[2]   || eccpos[3]   | eccpos[2]   |
>  | 5 | eccpos[3]  | eccpos[3]   || eccpos[4]   | eccpos[3]   |
>  | 6 | eccpos[4]  | eccpos[4]   || eccpos[5]   | eccpos[4]   |
>  | 7 | eccpos[5]  | eccpos[5]   || eccpos[6]   | eccpos[5]   |
>  | 8 | eccpos[6]  | eccpos[6]   || eccpos[7]   | eccpos[6]   |
>  | 9 | eccpos[7]  | eccpos[7]   || eccpos[8]   | eccpos[7]   |
>  |10 | eccpos[8]  | eccpos[8]   || eccpos[9]   | eccpos[8]   |
>  |11 | eccpos[9]  | eccpos[9]   || eccpos[10]  | eccpos[9]   |
>  |12 | eccpos[10] | eccpos[10]  || eccpos[11]  | eccpos[10]  |
>  |13 | eccpos[11] | eccpos[11]  || oobfree[0]  | eccpos[11]  |
>  |14 | eccpos[12] | eccpos[12]  || oobfree[1]  | oobfree[0]  |
>  |15 | eccpos[13] | <reserved>  || oobfree[2]  | oobfree[1]  |
>  +---+------------+-------------++-------------+-------------+
>  |16 | eccpos[14] | eccpos[13]  || oobfree[3]  | oobfree[2]  |
>  |...| [...]      | [...]       || [...]       | [...]       |
>  |56 | eccpos[54] | eccpos[51]  || oobfree[43] | oobfree[42] |
>  |57 | eccpos[55] | <reserved>  || oobfree[44] | oobfree[43] |
>  +===+============+=============+==============+=============+
>  |58 | oobfree[0] | oobfree[0]  || oobfree[45] | oobfree[44] |
>  |59 | oobfree[1] | oobfree[1]  || oobfree[46] | oobfree[45] |
>  |60 | oobfree[2] | oobfree[2]  || oobfree[47] | oobfree[46] |
>  |61 | oobfree[3] | oobfree[3]  || oobfree[48] | oobfree[47] |
>  |62 | oobfree[4] | oobfree[4]  || oobfree[49] | oobfree[48] |
>  |63 | oobfree[5] | oobfree[5]  || oobfree[50] | oobfree[49] |
>  +---+------------+-------------+--------------+-------------+
> 
> [1] ecc-layout expected by ROM code, as specified in SoC TRM under:
>       Chapter="Initialization"
>         Section="Device Initialization by ROM code"
>             Sub-Section="Memory Booting"
>                 Heading="NAND"
>                 Figure="ECC Locations in NAND Spare Areas"
> 
> [2] ecc-layout updates in u-boot
>     http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-November/167551.html
> 
> [3] u-boot configurations to match above ecc-layout are documented at
>     https://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Linux_Core_NAND_User%27s_Guide
> 
> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13.x+
> Reported-by: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@iseebcn.com>
> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>

Seems to me that the commit message above could actually be placed in
a doc/README.* file, making the commit message itself less bulky.

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Amicalement,
Brian Norris Feb. 23, 2014, 10:55 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:11:23 +0530, Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com> wrote:
> > Fixes: commit a919e51161b58ed7e6e663daba99ab7d558808f3
> >        mtd: nand: omap2: clean-up BCHx_HW and BCHx_SW ECC configurations in device_probe
> > 
> > Fixes ecclayout mismatch introduced in above commit for following ecc-schemes:
> >  - OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
> >  - OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW
> >  However, this patch also touches other ecc-schemes as the fix required
> >  refactoring common code, into ecc-scheme specific code.
> > 
> > This patch aligns ecc-layout for below ecc-schemes as per reference [1],[2],[3]
> >                 Figure="ECC Locations in NAND Spare Areas"
[snip]
> 
> Seems to me that the commit message above could actually be placed in
> a doc/README.* file, making the commit message itself less bulky.

Yes, I have suggested Pekon add this as a proper documentation file. But
I will take the patches as-is anyway.

Brian
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index ef4190a..34ef941 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	int				i;
 	dma_cap_mask_t			mask;
 	unsigned			sig;
+	unsigned			oob_index;
 	struct resource			*res;
 	struct mtd_part_parser_data	ppdata = {};
 
@@ -1826,9 +1827,11 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 							(mtd->writesize /
 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
 		if (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
-			ecclayout->eccpos[0]	= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+			oob_index		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
 		else
-			ecclayout->eccpos[0]	= 1;
+			oob_index		= 1;
+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
+			ecclayout->eccpos[i]	= oob_index;
 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
 		break;
@@ -1847,7 +1850,12 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
 							(mtd->writesize /
 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++) {
+			ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
+			if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
+				oob_index++;
+		}
 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
 		/* software bch library is used for locating errors */
@@ -1883,7 +1891,9 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
 							(mtd->writesize /
 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
+			ecclayout->eccpos[i]	= oob_index;
 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
 		/* This ECC scheme requires ELM H/W block */
@@ -1913,7 +1923,12 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
 							(mtd->writesize /
 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++) {
+			ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
+			if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
+				oob_index++;
+		}
 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
 		/* software bch library is used for locating errors */
@@ -1956,7 +1971,9 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ecclayout->eccbytes		= nand_chip->ecc.bytes *
 							(mtd->writesize /
 							nand_chip->ecc.size);
-		ecclayout->eccpos[0]		= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		oob_index			= BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
+		for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
+			ecclayout->eccpos[i]	= oob_index;
 		ecclayout->oobfree->offset	= ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
 							ecclayout->eccbytes;
 		break;
@@ -1975,8 +1992,6 @@  static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	/* populate remaining ECC layout data */
 	ecclayout->oobfree->length = mtd->oobsize - (BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH +
 							ecclayout->eccbytes);
-	for (i = 1; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++)
-		ecclayout->eccpos[i] = ecclayout->eccpos[0] + i;
 	/* check if NAND device's OOB is enough to store ECC signatures */
 	if (mtd->oobsize < (ecclayout->eccbytes + BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH)) {
 		pr_err("not enough OOB bytes required = %d, available=%d\n",