From patchwork Wed Apr 25 19:06:06 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mike Dunn X-Patchwork-Id: 155063 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:4978:20e::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AFD2B6F62 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 05:07:35 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SN7Xv-0004Im-Ec; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:06:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.newsguy.com ([74.209.136.69]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SN7Xq-0004HL-CR for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:06:31 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (22.sub-166-250-1.myvzw.com [166.250.1.22]) by smtp.newsguy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3PJ6FAX016192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:06:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikedunn@newsguy.com) From: Mike Dunn To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 2/7] mtd: nand: fix incorrect ecc strength values Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:06:06 -0700 Message-Id: <1335380771-27805-3-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.3.4 In-Reply-To: <1335380771-27805-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com> References: <1335380771-27805-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com> X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: Scott Branden , Mike Dunn , Jiandong Zheng , Prabhakar Kushwaha , Lars-Peter Clausen X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org This fixes a couple of ecc strength values for which I earlier made conservative guesses, but whose correct values were later determined [1] (thanks Ivan). Also sets strength for fsl_ifc_nand, which was merged to mainline after the original patch that set the strength for all drivers. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-March/040325.html Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn --- This v2 is actually unchanged from the original set. drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c | 7 +------ drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 1 + drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c | 6 +----- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c index 6908cdd..7134adf 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c @@ -476,12 +476,7 @@ static int __devinit bcm_umi_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) this->badblock_pattern = &largepage_bbt; } - /* - * FIXME: ecc strength value of 6 bits per 512 bytes of data is a - * conservative guess, given 13 ecc bytes and using bch alg. - * (Assume Galois field order m=15 to allow a margin of error.) - */ - this->ecc.strength = 6; + this->ecc.strength = 8; #endif diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c index 5387cec..872cc96 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c @@ -821,6 +821,7 @@ static int fsl_ifc_chip_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv) /* Hardware generates ECC per 512 Bytes */ chip->ecc.size = 512; chip->ecc.bytes = 8; + chip->ecc.strength = 4; switch (csor & CSOR_NAND_PGS_MASK) { case CSOR_NAND_PGS_512: diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c index e4147e8..a6fa884 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c @@ -332,11 +332,7 @@ static int __devinit jz_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST; chip->ecc.size = 512; chip->ecc.bytes = 9; - chip->ecc.strength = 2; - /* - * FIXME: ecc_strength value of 2 bits per 512 bytes of data is a - * conservative guess, given 9 ecc bytes and reed-solomon alg. - */ + chip->ecc.strength = 4; if (pdata) chip->ecc.layout = pdata->ecc_layout;