| Message ID | 1334652536-4442-1-git-send-email-ivan.djelic@parrot.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:48 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > This patch adds a simple BCH ecc computation api, similar to the > existing Hamming ecc api. It is intended to be used by the MTD layer. > It implements the following features: > > - support 4-bit and 8-bit ecc computation > - do not protect user bytes in spare area, only data area is protected > - ecc for an erased NAND page (0xFFs) is also a sequence of 0xFFs > > This last feature is obtained by adding a constant polynomial to > the hardware computed ecc. It allows to correct bitflips in blank pages > and is extremely useful to support filesystems such as UBIFS, which expect > erased pages to contain only 0xFFs. > > This api has been tested on an OMAP3630 board. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com> Hi Tony, what do you think about merging this patch? This is the enabler for making UBIFS actually usable on OMAP platforms which use BCH ECC. There are 2 other MTD patches which depend on this - so I wonder if it is easier to merge this one via the MTD tree, providing it has your/others' ack(s). Thanks!
Hi, * Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> [120425 07:52]: > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:48 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > This patch adds a simple BCH ecc computation api, similar to the > > existing Hamming ecc api. It is intended to be used by the MTD layer. > > It implements the following features: > > > > - support 4-bit and 8-bit ecc computation > > - do not protect user bytes in spare area, only data area is protected > > - ecc for an erased NAND page (0xFFs) is also a sequence of 0xFFs > > > > This last feature is obtained by adding a constant polynomial to > > the hardware computed ecc. It allows to correct bitflips in blank pages > > and is extremely useful to support filesystems such as UBIFS, which expect > > erased pages to contain only 0xFFs. > > > > This api has been tested on an OMAP3630 board. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com> > > Hi Tony, > > what do you think about merging this patch? This is the enabler for > making UBIFS actually usable on OMAP platforms which use BCH ECC. There > are 2 other MTD patches which depend on this - so I wonder if it is > easier to merge this one via the MTD tree, providing it has your/others' > ack(s). Looks OK to me, however there are other pending GPMC patches to convert it to a platform device device driver. Need to look those closer though. Anyways, it's best that I queue them to avoid merge conflicts. Do you these for other changes for UBIFS? If so, I can set up an immutable branch for GPMC that you can merge in as well. Regards, Tony
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 08:23 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > * Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> [120425 07:52]: > > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:48 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > > This patch adds a simple BCH ecc computation api, similar to the > > > existing Hamming ecc api. It is intended to be used by the MTD layer. > > > It implements the following features: > > > > > > - support 4-bit and 8-bit ecc computation > > > - do not protect user bytes in spare area, only data area is protected > > > - ecc for an erased NAND page (0xFFs) is also a sequence of 0xFFs > > > > > > This last feature is obtained by adding a constant polynomial to > > > the hardware computed ecc. It allows to correct bitflips in blank pages > > > and is extremely useful to support filesystems such as UBIFS, which expect > > > erased pages to contain only 0xFFs. > > > > > > This api has been tested on an OMAP3630 board. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com> > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > what do you think about merging this patch? This is the enabler for > > making UBIFS actually usable on OMAP platforms which use BCH ECC. There > > are 2 other MTD patches which depend on this - so I wonder if it is > > easier to merge this one via the MTD tree, providing it has your/others' > > ack(s). > > Looks OK to me, however there are other pending GPMC patches to convert > it to a platform device device driver. Need to look those closer though. > Anyways, it's best that I queue them to avoid merge conflicts. Sure. > Do you these for other changes for UBIFS? Not in UBIFS, but in drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c - Ivan sent another patch which adds BCH support to to omap2.c, was sent to linux-omap, subject "[PATCH] mtd: nand: omap: add support for hardware BCH ecc" > If so, I can set up an immutable > branch for GPMC that you can merge in as well. I guess this would be a good idea, but probably it is better to do this when you believe you merged most gpmc patches, so probably closer to the final -rc?
* Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> [120425 08:48]: > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 08:23 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> [120425 07:52]: > > > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:48 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > > > This patch adds a simple BCH ecc computation api, similar to the > > > > existing Hamming ecc api. It is intended to be used by the MTD layer. > > > > It implements the following features: > > > > > > > > - support 4-bit and 8-bit ecc computation > > > > - do not protect user bytes in spare area, only data area is protected > > > > - ecc for an erased NAND page (0xFFs) is also a sequence of 0xFFs > > > > > > > > This last feature is obtained by adding a constant polynomial to > > > > the hardware computed ecc. It allows to correct bitflips in blank pages > > > > and is extremely useful to support filesystems such as UBIFS, which expect > > > > erased pages to contain only 0xFFs. > > > > > > > > This api has been tested on an OMAP3630 board. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com> > > > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > what do you think about merging this patch? This is the enabler for > > > making UBIFS actually usable on OMAP platforms which use BCH ECC. There > > > are 2 other MTD patches which depend on this - so I wonder if it is > > > easier to merge this one via the MTD tree, providing it has your/others' > > > ack(s). > > > > Looks OK to me, however there are other pending GPMC patches to convert > > it to a platform device device driver. Need to look those closer though. > > Anyways, it's best that I queue them to avoid merge conflicts. > > Sure. > > > Do you these for other changes for UBIFS? > > Not in UBIFS, but in drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c - Ivan sent another patch > which adds BCH support to to omap2.c, was sent to linux-omap, subject > "[PATCH] mtd: nand: omap: add support for hardware BCH ecc" > > > If so, I can set up an immutable > > branch for GPMC that you can merge in as well. > > I guess this would be a good idea, but probably it is better to do this > when you believe you merged most gpmc patches, so probably closer to the > final -rc? Yes let's wait a week or so as there are also the dmaengine patch for drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c that might conflict. So let's get the dmaengine patches to some branch first. Regards, Tony
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [120425 09:01]: > * Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> [120425 08:48]: > > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 08:23 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > * Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> [120425 07:52]: > > > > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:48 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > > > > This patch adds a simple BCH ecc computation api, similar to the > > > > > existing Hamming ecc api. It is intended to be used by the MTD layer. > > > > > It implements the following features: > > > > > > > > > > - support 4-bit and 8-bit ecc computation > > > > > - do not protect user bytes in spare area, only data area is protected > > > > > - ecc for an erased NAND page (0xFFs) is also a sequence of 0xFFs > > > > > > > > > > This last feature is obtained by adding a constant polynomial to > > > > > the hardware computed ecc. It allows to correct bitflips in blank pages > > > > > and is extremely useful to support filesystems such as UBIFS, which expect > > > > > erased pages to contain only 0xFFs. > > > > > > > > > > This api has been tested on an OMAP3630 board. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com> > > > > > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > > > what do you think about merging this patch? This is the enabler for > > > > making UBIFS actually usable on OMAP platforms which use BCH ECC. There > > > > are 2 other MTD patches which depend on this - so I wonder if it is > > > > easier to merge this one via the MTD tree, providing it has your/others' > > > > ack(s). > > > > > > Looks OK to me, however there are other pending GPMC patches to convert > > > it to a platform device device driver. Need to look those closer though. > > > Anyways, it's best that I queue them to avoid merge conflicts. > > > > Sure. > > > > > Do you these for other changes for UBIFS? > > > > Not in UBIFS, but in drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c - Ivan sent another patch > > which adds BCH support to to omap2.c, was sent to linux-omap, subject > > "[PATCH] mtd: nand: omap: add support for hardware BCH ecc" > > > > > If so, I can set up an immutable > > > branch for GPMC that you can merge in as well. > > > > I guess this would be a good idea, but probably it is better to do this > > when you believe you merged most gpmc patches, so probably closer to the > > final -rc? > > Yes let's wait a week or so as there are also the dmaengine patch for > drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c that might conflict. So let's get the dmaengine > patches to some branch first. Looking at the gpmc platform driver series, we can't merge those until all the board-*.c files are converted. So let's plan on first making sure the dmaengine changes work, then apply the BCH ecc patches. Regards, Tony
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c index 00d5108..dc9a9a4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ #define GPMC_ECC_CONTROL 0x1f8 #define GPMC_ECC_SIZE_CONFIG 0x1fc #define GPMC_ECC1_RESULT 0x200 +#define GPMC_ECC_BCH_RESULT_0 0x240 #define GPMC_CS0_OFFSET 0x60 #define GPMC_CS_SIZE 0x30 @@ -920,3 +921,150 @@ int gpmc_calculate_ecc(int cs, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpmc_calculate_ecc); + +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 + +/** + * gpmc_enable_hwecc_bch - enable hardware BCH ecc functionality + * @cs: chip select number + * @mode: read/write mode + * @dev_width: device bus width(1 for x16, 0 for x8) + * @nsectors: how many 512-byte sectors to process + * @nerrors: how many errors to correct per sector (4 or 8) + */ +int gpmc_enable_hwecc_bch(int cs, int mode, int dev_width, int nsectors, + int nerrors) +{ + unsigned int val; + + /* check if ecc module is in use */ + if (gpmc_ecc_used != -EINVAL) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * FIXME: some OMAP3 revisions have a hardware bug which prevents + * the 4-bit BCH mode to work properly. Such revisions should be + * detected and rejected here. + */ + + gpmc_ecc_used = cs; + + /* clear ecc and enable bits */ + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_ECC_CONTROL, 0x101); + + /* + * When using BCH, sector size is hardcoded to 512 bytes. + * Here we are using wrapping mode 6 both for reading and writing, with: + * size0 = 0 (no additional protected byte in spare area) + * size1 = 32 (skip 32 nibbles = 16 bytes per sector in spare area) + */ + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_ECC_SIZE_CONFIG, (32 << 22) | (0 << 12)); + + /* BCH configuration */ + val = ((1 << 16) | /* enable BCH */ + (((nerrors == 8) ? 1 : 0) << 12) | /* 8 or 4 bits */ + (0x06 << 8) | /* wrap mode = 6 */ + (dev_width << 7) | /* bus width */ + (((nsectors-1) & 0x7) << 4) | /* number of sectors */ + (cs << 1) | /* ECC CS */ + (0x1)); /* enable ECC */ + + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_ECC_CONFIG, val); + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpmc_enable_hwecc_bch); + +/** + * gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch4 - Generate 7 ecc bytes per sector of 512 data bytes + * @cs: chip select number + * @dat: The pointer to data on which ecc is computed + * @ecc: The ecc output buffer + */ +int gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch4(int cs, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc) +{ + int i; + unsigned long nsectors, reg, val1, val2; + + if (gpmc_ecc_used != cs) + return -EINVAL; + + nsectors = ((gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_ECC_CONFIG) >> 4) & 0x7) + 1; + + for (i = 0; i < nsectors; i++) { + + reg = GPMC_ECC_BCH_RESULT_0 + 16*i; + + /* Read hw-computed remainder */ + val1 = gpmc_read_reg(reg + 0); + val2 = gpmc_read_reg(reg + 4); + + /* + * Add constant polynomial to remainder, in order to get an ecc + * sequence of 0xFFs for a buffer filled with 0xFFs; and + * left-justify the resulting polynomial. + */ + *ecc++ = 0x28 ^ ((val2 >> 12) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x13 ^ ((val2 >> 4) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0xcc ^ (((val2 & 0xF) << 4)|((val1 >> 28) & 0xF)); + *ecc++ = 0x39 ^ ((val1 >> 20) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x96 ^ ((val1 >> 12) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0xac ^ ((val1 >> 4) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x7f ^ ((val1 & 0xF) << 4); + } + + gpmc_ecc_used = -EINVAL; + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch4); + +/** + * gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch8 - Generate 13 ecc bytes per block of 512 data bytes + * @cs: chip select number + * @dat: The pointer to data on which ecc is computed + * @ecc: The ecc output buffer + */ +int gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch8(int cs, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc) +{ + int i; + unsigned long nsectors, reg, val1, val2, val3, val4; + + if (gpmc_ecc_used != cs) + return -EINVAL; + + nsectors = ((gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_ECC_CONFIG) >> 4) & 0x7) + 1; + + for (i = 0; i < nsectors; i++) { + + reg = GPMC_ECC_BCH_RESULT_0 + 16*i; + + /* Read hw-computed remainder */ + val1 = gpmc_read_reg(reg + 0); + val2 = gpmc_read_reg(reg + 4); + val3 = gpmc_read_reg(reg + 8); + val4 = gpmc_read_reg(reg + 12); + + /* + * Add constant polynomial to remainder, in order to get an ecc + * sequence of 0xFFs for a buffer filled with 0xFFs. + */ + *ecc++ = 0xef ^ (val4 & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x51 ^ ((val3 >> 24) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x2e ^ ((val3 >> 16) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x09 ^ ((val3 >> 8) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0xed ^ (val3 & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x93 ^ ((val2 >> 24) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x9a ^ ((val2 >> 16) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0xc2 ^ ((val2 >> 8) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x97 ^ (val2 & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x79 ^ ((val1 >> 24) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0xe5 ^ ((val1 >> 16) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0x24 ^ ((val1 >> 8) & 0xFF); + *ecc++ = 0xb5 ^ (val1 & 0xFF); + } + + gpmc_ecc_used = -EINVAL; + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch8); + +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 */ diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h index 1527929..23791ca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ enum omap_ecc { OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_HW, /* gpmc to detect the error */ /* 1-bit ecc: stored at beginning of spare area as romcode */ OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_HW_ROMCODE, /* gpmc method & romcode layout */ + OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW, /* 4-bit BCH ecc code */ + OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW, /* 8-bit BCH ecc code */ }; /* @@ -157,4 +159,12 @@ extern int gpmc_nand_write(int cs, int cmd, int wval); int gpmc_enable_hwecc(int cs, int mode, int dev_width, int ecc_size); int gpmc_calculate_ecc(int cs, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code); + +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 +int gpmc_enable_hwecc_bch(int cs, int mode, int dev_width, int nsectors, + int nerrors); +int gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch4(int cs, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc); +int gpmc_calculate_ecc_bch8(int cs, const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc); +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 */ + #endif
This patch adds a simple BCH ecc computation api, similar to the existing Hamming ecc api. It is intended to be used by the MTD layer. It implements the following features: - support 4-bit and 8-bit ecc computation - do not protect user bytes in spare area, only data area is protected - ecc for an erased NAND page (0xFFs) is also a sequence of 0xFFs This last feature is obtained by adding a constant polynomial to the hardware computed ecc. It allows to correct bitflips in blank pages and is extremely useful to support filesystems such as UBIFS, which expect erased pages to contain only 0xFFs. This api has been tested on an OMAP3630 board. Signed-off-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h | 10 +++ 2 files changed, 158 insertions(+)