From patchwork Sun Dec 12 08:23:33 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Brian Norris X-Patchwork-Id: 75221 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from canuck.infradead.org (canuck.infradead.org [134.117.69.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A54B7093 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:28:05 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PRhEX-0002cR-Sk; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:24:41 +0000 Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PRhET-0002c7-LQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:24:39 +0000 Received: from [10.9.200.131] by MMS3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:24:50 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: B55A25B1-5D7D-41F8-BC53-C57E7AD3C201 Received: from mail-irva-13.broadcom.com (10.11.16.103) by IRVEXCHHUB01.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.200.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.247.2; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:24:11 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ld-irv-0074 [10.12.160.50]) by mail-irva-13.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A1074D04; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:24:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Brian Norris" To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: rearrange ONFI revision checking, add ONFI 2.3 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:23:33 -0800 Message-ID: <1292142213-645-2-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.4 In-Reply-To: <1292142213-645-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> References: <1292142213-645-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 611A59580IO969819-01-01 X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20101212_032437_913831_5672C29A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.81 ) X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (1.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (computersforpeace[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL Cc: Mike Frysinger , Artem Bityutskiy , Matthieu Castet , Florian Fainelli , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org In checking for the ONFI revision, the first conditional (for checking "unsupported" ONFI) seems unnecessary. All ONFI revisions should be backwards-compatible; even if this is not the case on some newer ONFI revision, it should simply fail the second version-checking if-else block (i.e., the bit-fields for 1.0, 2.0, etc. would not be set to 1). Thus, we move our "unsupported" condition after having checked each bit field. Also, it's simple enough to add a condition for ONFI revision 2.3. Note that this does *NOT* mean we handle all new features of ONFI versions above 1.0. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris Acked-by: Florian Fainelli --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 38b5eb0..2237a87 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -2872,20 +2872,24 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, /* check version */ val = le16_to_cpu(p->revision); - if (val == 1 || val > (1 << 4)) { - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unsupported ONFI version: %d\n", - __func__, val); - return 0; - } - - if (val & (1 << 4)) + if (val & (1 << 5)) + chip->onfi_version = 23; + else if (val & (1 << 4)) chip->onfi_version = 22; else if (val & (1 << 3)) chip->onfi_version = 21; else if (val & (1 << 2)) chip->onfi_version = 20; - else + else if (val & (1 << 1)) chip->onfi_version = 10; + else + chip->onfi_version = 0; + + if (!chip->onfi_version) { + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unsupported ONFI version: %d\n", + __func__, val); + return 0; + } sanitize_string(p->manufacturer, sizeof(p->manufacturer)); sanitize_string(p->model, sizeof(p->model));