Message ID | CAJ0PZbQ1=+BTs0Emi78kfOWD5d90+ND5Jc_SJ9T4BcGMXyny9A@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
MyungJoo Ham wrote: > > Hello, > Hi, > Please pull the patches for Exynos4 SoCs that support devfreq device > drivers for Exynos4210/4212/4412. > > The patches are: > ARM: EXYNOS4: Add DMC1, allow PPMU access for DMC. > ARM: EXYNOS4: Add clock register addresses for Exynos4x12 bus devfreq > driver > ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: support Exynos4210-bus Devfreq driver. > > Gitweb: http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux- > samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/devfreq-for-samsung > Git Repository: git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung > Branch: devfreq-for-samsung > > The following changes since commit > 390f998509bf049019df0b078c0a6606e0d57fb4: > > Merge: e34d6b4 6f6c2aa > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Date: Sun Dec 18 14:28:31 2011 -0800 > > Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes- > 2.6 > (2011-12-18 14:28:31 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung.git devfreq-for- > samsung > > MyungJoo Ham (3): > ARM: EXYNOS4: Add DMC1, allow PPMU access for DMC. > ARM: EXYNOS4: Add clock register addresses for Exynos4x12 bus > devfreq driver > ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: support Exynos4210-bus Devfreq driver. > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpu.c | 7 +++- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 42 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c | 11 ++++-- > 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > As I commented, looks ok to me and will apply patches not pull and since I didn't get your answer to ask 'topic branch is required for this', I didn't yet. As a note, if there is no reason to create based on not -rc, just use -rc. Merry Christmas. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > As I commented, looks ok to me and will apply patches not pull and since I > didn't get your answer to ask 'topic branch is required for this', I didn't > yet. > > As a note, if there is no reason to create based on not -rc, just use -rc. > > Merry Christmas. > Thanks. > Hello, Having a topic branch for devfreq is fine and I don't care whether there is one or not as long as the required registers are supported. Because the registers added in the patches do not seem to be devfreq specific, I don't think we should have another branch for this. Thus, having the patches in your Exynos' branch is also fine. I'll let future pull-requested branches be rebased on rcX anyway. Thanks. Cheers! Happy new year! - MyungJoo