| Message ID | 52AAC671.6000207@monstr.eu |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people individually. The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that you send your email without you needing to know who they are. 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as a pull request message. Thanks.
Hi Russell, On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people > individually. The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches > the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that > you send your email without you needing to know who they are. > > 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as > a pull request message. Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done before and this is the first complain I have got. Thanks, Michal
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people > > individually. The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches > > the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that > > you send your email without you needing to know who they are. > > > > 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as > > a pull request message. > > Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done > before and this is the first complain I have got. I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint. -Olof
On 12/17/2013 09:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Russell, >> >> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people >>> individually. The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches >>> the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that >>> you send your email without you needing to know who they are. >>> >>> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as >>> a pull request message. >> >> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done >> before and this is the first complain I have got. > > I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a > friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint. that's how I take it. The point here is just if I should send pull request again. Thanks, Michal
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes: > On 12/17/2013 09:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >>> Hi Russell, >>> >>> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>>> 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people >>>> individually. The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches >>>> the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that >>>> you send your email without you needing to know who they are. >>>> >>>> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as >>>> a pull request message. >>> >>> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done >>> before and this is the first complain I have got. >> >> I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a >> friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint. > > that's how I take it. > The point here is just if I should send pull request again. No need to send again. Kevin
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:33:53AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, > > Please pull these dt changes to your tree. Pulled, however: > Soren Brinkmann (2): > arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes > arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node > > Steffen Trumtrar (1): > ARM: zynq: add gem support Minor nit: Please be consistent with patch subjects. We try to stick to: ARM: <platform>: <...> -Olof
Hi Olof, On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:37:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:33:53AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, > > > > Please pull these dt changes to your tree. > > Pulled, however: > > > Soren Brinkmann (2): > > arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes > > arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node > > > > Steffen Trumtrar (1): > > ARM: zynq: add gem support > > Minor nit: Please be consistent with patch subjects. We try to stick to: > > ARM: <platform>: <...> I'll keep that in mind for future submissions, Thanks, Sören
Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, Please pull these dt changes to your tree. Thanks, Michal The following changes since commit dc1ccc48159d63eca5089e507c82c7d22ef60839: Linux 3.13-rc2 (2013-11-29 12:57:14 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-dt-for-3.14 for you to fetch changes up to 41e4cdb95efa7e8fc88c65cb3c7221e89b9efb49: arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node (2013-12-12 09:50:23 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- arm: Xilinx Zynq dt patches for v3.14 - Add gem support - Add cpus node - TTC cleanup ---------------------------------------------------------------- Soren Brinkmann (2): arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node Steffen Trumtrar (1): ARM: zynq: add gem support arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 5 +++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 5 +++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)