| Message ID | 20210310160547.55382-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Original-To: incoming-imx@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-imx@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05; helo=desiato.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=o/LbjUiY; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mchp header.b=uex7h1Sk; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DwcYR1SqYz9sRR for <incoming-imx@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:12:43 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=hihfbQCGyxYmsQHO9i/8DZwTVQCBIvPp3HkCPM3vzOo=; b=o/LbjUiYIwpiqfCxnJTslhKe0B +IiuIdcvAau/TRh2+ew4d0TzSJkzyXvXWaDccFdU7PubtuXaxL4fBiMfyh40Bquimll5tuD/j/ugW uHQz4IA8TFq7SiTjT8/3x060HaOv5BZE3bUFNO8ctZBPC2KZVSqeZ3RDZEH+SAVjkIQQDUNpQcmzr bxZOxKvFfmcxQCgWldFNJ01htDq2DHlZETenNSg0Q5j0JtE4G89DV9Q6DRggS8HjKbLpXeDJbTEzP o5VtxVFCBADVuB8ALhHwd1r9LiKH1Shf+tHAuyG5NmvcBSubALbIia7/QBVVp3TRqe2LnsaQ+eKxO dzFPmZPg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK1Ra-007Bqx-Gk; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:12:19 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK1QJ-007BDK-SN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:11:08 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1615392659; x=1646928659; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=O5jeKypV2ExKtHu5QJ2ITrvif4oyKitUExTdelTu/Qo=; b=uex7h1SkohHsp63OJBkRHYn+WTBTXhleOcrZbixpnh+cXssN3t6CfTW4 hU2vfMQ38u4h7oNopjF7EY+ZL9D2Y9ASiIHmg69rchxjmeEck9VseQc7m SFbOQc728OSLaho7JLL1/bPpMRay6g6aTR6FZOaUwZyQWwjY/Buk0olKw /AEYOuPxuvgEuqO+0XvEXRaCn4l3Ld4Zz0XiQcDwwsR2g9OqZyCD9FyEZ o3Kw3NCWSOCBdNCBYilNCqqOyA2aInuPSKhdIhxAeJKiiBK6Bwi++gvpt 3tyTPeuxtifCnQUP02S6hOVV7SFt7HYO17hnVkeDOAAz5pZL1zd+Dnzli g==; IronPort-SDR: nEaPGjPgYT3WDxBsCTOOdsRUMVINyPtJBcEgKTRUNDp9FEeYRZcDojqs1/h6MdrlEmC0BmQCOz gp3dxzKAy+omQxtr+rD/OgcSJ4MbdKHAPQnUzAuGSaP2JxRNi2EJ2djotDRutXic9la4Lf3bEY ULgI0r2JqdEjEpkWvHN/auHfDKLmO6KgBnp4cYoAAJTjIFHqcm5F8MOIlSPBPhYaQEyrPBrQ5e HTh4Ft5XMYDgQ5SyVjSz65qaCYeXsJDSK0Np+WG5etgvAyD58cB1MiBD+RK+0n+DKqVt97Ho3u e2w= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,237,1610434800"; d="scan'208";a="46983116" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 10 Mar 2021 09:10:56 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:10:56 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:10:53 -0700 From: <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, <arm@kernel.org>, <soc@kernel.org> Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: fixes for 5.12 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:05:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20210310160547.55382-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: microchip X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210310_161100_307069_CF72CCBF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.93 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "desiato.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Arnd, Olof, Here are some fixes for 5.12. It's not regression vs. previous revision, this is why I send them early in the cycle. I based my branch on top of 5.12-rc2 because I noticed that your "master" branch wa [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [68.232.154.123 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [68.232.154.123 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.3 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org |
| Series |
[GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: fixes for 5.12
|
expand
|
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Arnd, Olof, Here are some fixes for 5.12. It's not regression vs. previous revision, this is why I send them early in the cycle. I based my branch on top of 5.12-rc2 because I noticed that your "master" branch was pointing to it (and of course the "-dontuse" suffix from Linus). Tell me if you prefer that I use a more usual "-rc1". Thanks, best regards, Nicolas The following changes since commit a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15: Linux 5.12-rc2 (2021-03-05 17:33:41 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-fixes-5.12 for you to fetch changes up to 2c69c8a1736eace8de491d480e6e577a27c2087c: ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: fix mux-mask to match product's datasheet (2021-03-10 16:38:15 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- AT91 fixes for 5.12: - only DT changes -- wrong phy address that blocks Ethernet use on boards with sama5d27 SoM1 -- restrictive PIN possibilities for sam9x60 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Claudiu Beznea (1): ARM: dts: at91-sama5d27_som1: fix phy address to 7 Federico Pellegrin (1): ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: fix mux-mask for PA7 so it can be set to A, B and C Nicolas Ferre (1): ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: fix mux-mask to match product's datasheet arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts | 8 -------- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d27_som1.dtsi | 4 ++-- arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)