diff mbox

[1/3] mfd: always assign of_node in mfd_add_device()

Message ID 20131220142530.GK3709@lee--X1
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Lee Jones Dec. 20, 2013, 2:25 p.m. UTC 
Hi Stephen,

Please let me know if this is suitable and I can keep your Ack.

----

mfd: Revert "mfd: Always assign of_node in mfd_add_device()"

This reverts commit 68044bee13770918e0b28dd44aa98c889ec7558f.

We've had confirmed reports of this patch causing unforeseen issues
with existing MFD users. It has been agreed by the original author
and myself that reversion is the best solution.

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

Comments

Stephen Warren Dec. 20, 2013, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 12/20/2013 07:25 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Please let me know if this is suitable and I can keep your Ack.

Yes, that patch is good. Thanks.
Stephen Warren Jan. 6, 2014, 6:12 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 12/20/2013 07:25 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Please let me know if this is suitable and I can keep your Ack.

This patch doesn't seem to have made it into next-20140106. I assume
that's just because of the holidays, not because it was forgotten?

> ----
> 
> mfd: Revert "mfd: Always assign of_node in mfd_add_device()"
> 
> This reverts commit 68044bee13770918e0b28dd44aa98c889ec7558f.
> 
> We've had confirmed reports of this patch causing unforeseen issues
> with existing MFD users. It has been agreed by the original author
> and myself that reversion is the best solution.
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> index 32e8d47..2676492 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> -	if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> -		pdev->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
>  
>  	if (cell->pdata_size) {
>  		ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev,
>
Lee Jones Jan. 7, 2014, 8:23 a.m. UTC | #3 
> > Please let me know if this is suitable and I can keep your Ack.
> 
> This patch doesn't seem to have made it into next-20140106. I assume
> that's just because of the holidays, not because it was forgotten?

Right, it was pushed yesterday morning.

> > ----
> > 
> > mfd: Revert "mfd: Always assign of_node in mfd_add_device()"
> > 
> > This reverts commit 68044bee13770918e0b28dd44aa98c889ec7558f.
> > 
> > We've had confirmed reports of this patch causing unforeseen issues
> > with existing MFD users. It has been agreed by the original author
> > and myself that reversion is the best solution.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > index 32e8d47..2676492 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> >  			}
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -	if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> > -		pdev->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
> >  
> >  	if (cell->pdata_size) {
> >  		ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev,
> > 
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
index 32e8d47..2676492 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
@@ -117,8 +117,6 @@  static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
-		pdev->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
 
 	if (cell->pdata_size) {
 		ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev,