Message ID | 1406868897-26874-2-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: > The pinctrl properties should be on the device directly and not on the > slot sub-node. > > Reported-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> Let's land this one before Jaehoon's, since it was a hidden functionality change in his patch. It will be an easy conflict to resolve when his patch is applied. Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
On 08/01/14 11:26, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >> The pinctrl properties should be on the device directly and not on the >> slot sub-node. >> >> Reported-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> >> Cc: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@samsung.com> >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> > > Let's land this one before Jaehoon's, since it was a hidden > functionality change in his patch. It will be an easy conflict to > resolve when his patch is applied. > Sounds good to me, I've applied this before Jaehoon's change. > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> Thanks, Kukjin
Hi Kukjin, On 18.08.2014 20:37, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 08/01/14 11:26, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Hi, >> > Hi, > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >>> The pinctrl properties should be on the device directly and not on the >>> slot sub-node. >>> >>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> >>> Cc: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@samsung.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> >> >> Let's land this one before Jaehoon's, since it was a hidden >> functionality change in his patch. It will be an easy conflict to >> resolve when his patch is applied. >> > Sounds good to me, I've applied this before Jaehoon's change. > >> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> Version 6 of this series has been already posted. However this particular patch has not changed, so it's fine. Best regards, Tomasz
On 08/18/14 13:48, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > On 18.08.2014 20:37, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> On 08/01/14 11:26, Doug Anderson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >> Hi, >> >>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >>>> The pinctrl properties should be on the device directly and not on the >>>> slot sub-node. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> >>>> Cc: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@samsung.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> >>> >>> Let's land this one before Jaehoon's, since it was a hidden >>> functionality change in his patch. It will be an easy conflict to >>> resolve when his patch is applied. >>> >> Sounds good to me, I've applied this before Jaehoon's change. >> >>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> > > Version 6 of this series has been already posted. However this > particular patch has not changed, so it's fine. > Oh, got it. Hope this and 2nd should be same with version 6 ;) Thanks. - Kukjin
Hi, Am 18.08.2014 22:03, schrieb Kukjin Kim: > On 08/18/14 13:48, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 18.08.2014 20:37, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> On 08/01/14 11:26, Doug Anderson wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> The pinctrl properties should be on the device directly and not on the >>>>> slot sub-node. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> >>>>> Cc: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@samsung.com> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> >>>> >>>> Let's land this one before Jaehoon's, since it was a hidden >>>> functionality change in his patch. It will be an easy conflict to >>>> resolve when his patch is applied. >>>> >>> Sounds good to me, I've applied this before Jaehoon's change. >>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org> >> >> Version 6 of this series has been already posted. However this >> particular patch has not changed, so it's fine. >> > Oh, got it. Hope this and 2nd should be same with version 6 ;) It is documented as such. :) Others did have changes, of course. I've started looking into rebasing myself: beware that the smdk5250 cleanup has an additional conflict in the spi node (cs-gpios movement). http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/commit/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts?h=v3.18-next/dt-samsung&id=e138d4333aa02a3daa12c04192bc5c842bffee74 Thanks, Andreas
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts index f2b8c4116541..eb437f6afec1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts @@ -240,10 +240,8 @@ */ mmc@12230000 { status = "okay"; - slot@0 { - pinctrl-names = "default"; - pinctrl-0 = <&sd3_clk &sd3_cmd &sd3_bus4>; - }; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&sd3_clk &sd3_cmd &sd3_bus4>; }; i2c@12CD0000 {