Message ID | 20220719112908.7333-1-gaoxin@cdjrlc.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Date:do not initialise statics to 0 | expand |
On 7/19/22 20:29, Xin Gao wrote: > do not initialise statics to 0 > > Signed-off-by: Xin Gao <gaoxin@cdjrlc.com> > --- > drivers/ata/pata_artop.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c b/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c > index 20a8f31a3f57..1aad8df2ea87 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > * test stuff. > */ > > -static int clock = 0; > +static int clock; > > /** > * artop62x0_pre_reset - probe begin Very weird patch title. Is this solving any static analyzer or compiler warning ? If not, this is not a very useful change.
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c b/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c index 20a8f31a3f57..1aad8df2ea87 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ * test stuff. */ -static int clock = 0; +static int clock; /** * artop62x0_pre_reset - probe begin
do not initialise statics to 0 Signed-off-by: Xin Gao <gaoxin@cdjrlc.com> --- drivers/ata/pata_artop.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)