Message ID | ZahG7xgHJ4Tf8mHI@shikoro |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [PULL,REQUEST] i2c-for-6.8-rc1-fixed | expand |
On 1/17/24 3:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > The following changes since commit 2cc14f52aeb78ce3f29677c2de1f06c0e91471ab: > > Linux 6.7-rc3 (2023-11-26 19:59:33 -0800) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git tags/i2c-for-6.8-rc1-fixed i2c-for-6.8-rc1-fixed boots fine. Thanks! Kim
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 13:30, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > And a big series for the > designware-driver needed to be reverted because issues have been > reported late in the cycle and no incremental fix has been found yet. > This is the fixed pull requested with a missing revert added. Honestly, with three quarters of the commits being the broken series, followed by reverting it, I get the feeling that this would be better rebased. I don't like rebasing, but I also don't like "look, we had most of these commits broken, so we just reverted them all" all noticed before it even hits my tree. So I really feel like at that point you go "this branch was a failure" and start anew - aka rebase. Along with a big explanation of why a recent rebase ended up happening, so that there is no confusion about it. Linus
> Honestly, with three quarters of the commits being the broken series, > followed by reverting it, I get the feeling that this would be better > rebased. Sure thing, will do.