Message ID | 21496b51-370f-2009-b25c-881c524fe2b9@axentia.se |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [PULL,REQUEST] i2c-mux for 4.15-rc1 | expand |
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:27:34PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch > that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver. > > Please pull. Thanks, pulled.
Hi Peda, > This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch > that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver. Did this maybe slip through the cracks? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/816846/ ("[trivial] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: Spelling s/required is/required if/") Regards, Wolfram
On 2017-10-27 21:27, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Peda, > >> This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch >> that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver. > > Did this maybe slip through the cracks? > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/816846/ > > ("[trivial] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: Spelling s/required is/required > if/") Right. Blush. I blame the immense flow of patches. I just can't seem to keep up... :-) Anyway, thanks for catching this and sorry for making you do that. Some words for the merge commit: This trivial patch managed to fall through the cracks and was forgotten in the first pull request, as noticed by Wolfram. Thanks. Please pull. Cheers, Peter The following changes since commit 3997fb74846f35d0364c5e88e54bc9b166d5a1bc: i2c: mux: reg: use of_property_read_bool() (2017-10-20 16:33:07 +0200) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git tags/i2c-mux/for-4.15-2 for you to fetch changes up to fcc046801b934ad27ba80e20e3e0f4c97957af58: dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: spelling s/required is/required if/ (2017-10-27 22:45:28 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Geert Uytterhoeven (1): dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: spelling s/required is/required if/ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> Right. Blush. I blame the immense flow of patches. I just can't seem to > keep up... :-) Anyway, thanks for catching this and sorry for making you > do that. No worries. Patchwork makes it easy for me to track patches. Speaking of, if you register at patchwork.ozlabs.org, then I could assign you the patches for the mux subsystem. Then you'd have the patches listed. Just saying... > Please pull. Thanks, pulled.
On 2017-10-28 14:25, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Right. Blush. I blame the immense flow of patches. I just can't seem to >> keep up... :-) Anyway, thanks for catching this and sorry for making you >> do that. > > No worries. Patchwork makes it easy for me to track patches. Speaking > of, if you register at patchwork.ozlabs.org, then I could assign you the > patches for the mux subsystem. Then you'd have the patches listed. Just > saying... Sounds like a splendid idea. I signed up as 'peda'. Do you need anything else? Cheers, Peter
> Sounds like a splendid idea. I signed up as 'peda'. Great! > Do you need anything else? Nope, I need to ask Jeremy to add you to the i2c project. Can't do this myself, sadly. Will keep you updated!