diff mbox series

[5/6] gpio: pca953x: Make platform teardown callback return void

Message ID 20220628140313.74984-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
State Deferred
Headers show
Series [1/6] drm/i2c/sil164: Drop no-op remove function | expand

Commit Message

Uwe Kleine-König June 28, 2022, 2:03 p.m. UTC
All platforms that provide a teardown callback return 0. New users are
supposed to not make use of platform support, so there is no
functionality lost.

This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Forwarded: id:20220502170555.51183-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 12 ++++--------
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c             | 11 +++--------
 include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko June 28, 2022, 7:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 4:04 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> All platforms that provide a teardown callback return 0. New users are
> supposed to not make use of platform support, so there is no
> functionality lost.
>
> This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Forwarded: id:20220502170555.51183-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de

What is this tag for? Has it been documented?

(Linus recently was ranting against homegrown custom (read:
non-documented) tags)

For now the code looks good,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

However, I prefer to see dropping those callbacks altogether (find the
way how to use GPIO descriptors / GPIO table / etc instead of ugly
custom callbacks).

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 12 ++++--------
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c             | 11 +++--------
>  include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h   |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> index efc26b472ef8..09253e70d0dc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> @@ -518,8 +518,8 @@ static int da850_evm_ui_expander_setup(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned gpio,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int da850_evm_ui_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
> -                                       unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
> +static void da850_evm_ui_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
> +                                          unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
>  {
>         platform_device_unregister(&da850_evm_ui_keys_device);
>
> @@ -531,8 +531,6 @@ static int da850_evm_ui_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
>         gpio_free(gpio + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_C);
>         gpio_free(gpio + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_B);
>         gpio_free(gpio + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_A);
> -
> -       return 0;
>  }
>
>  /* assign the baseboard expander's GPIOs after the UI board's */
> @@ -699,13 +697,11 @@ static int da850_evm_bb_expander_setup(struct i2c_client *client,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int da850_evm_bb_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
> -                                       unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
> +static void da850_evm_bb_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
> +                                          unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
>  {
>         platform_device_unregister(&da850_evm_bb_leds_device);
>         platform_device_unregister(&da850_evm_bb_keys_device);
> -
> -       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static struct pca953x_platform_data da850_evm_ui_expander_info = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> index 08bc52c3cdcb..3eedeac9ec8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> @@ -1099,20 +1099,15 @@ static int pca953x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>         struct pca953x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
>         struct pca953x_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -       int ret;
>
>         if (pdata && pdata->teardown) {
> -               ret = pdata->teardown(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
> -                                     chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> -                       dev_err(&client->dev, "teardown failed, %d\n", ret);
> -       } else {
> -               ret = 0;
> +               pdata->teardown(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
> +                               chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
>         }
>
>         regulator_disable(chip->regulator);
>
> -       return ret;
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h b/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h
> index 4eb53e023997..96c1a14ab365 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct pca953x_platform_data {
>         int             (*setup)(struct i2c_client *client,
>                                 unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio,
>                                 void *context);
> -       int             (*teardown)(struct i2c_client *client,
> +       void            (*teardown)(struct i2c_client *client,
>                                 unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio,
>                                 void *context);
>         const char      *const *names;
> --
> 2.36.1
>
Uwe Kleine-König June 28, 2022, 8:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 4:04 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > All platforms that provide a teardown callback return 0. New users are
> > supposed to not make use of platform support, so there is no
> > functionality lost.
> >
> > This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > Forwarded: id:20220502170555.51183-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
> What is this tag for? Has it been documented?

No, this is a note to myself and wasn't intended to be sent out.

> However, I prefer to see dropping those callbacks altogether (find the
> way how to use GPIO descriptors / GPIO table / etc instead of ugly
> custom callbacks).

Agreed, but I didn't feel to sort out what happens there. Also I don't
have any of these platforms to test. So I chose the more conservative
approach.

Best regards
Uwe
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
index efc26b472ef8..09253e70d0dc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
@@ -518,8 +518,8 @@  static int da850_evm_ui_expander_setup(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned gpio,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int da850_evm_ui_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
-					unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
+static void da850_evm_ui_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
+					   unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
 {
 	platform_device_unregister(&da850_evm_ui_keys_device);
 
@@ -531,8 +531,6 @@  static int da850_evm_ui_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
 	gpio_free(gpio + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_C);
 	gpio_free(gpio + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_B);
 	gpio_free(gpio + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_A);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /* assign the baseboard expander's GPIOs after the UI board's */
@@ -699,13 +697,11 @@  static int da850_evm_bb_expander_setup(struct i2c_client *client,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int da850_evm_bb_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
-					unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
+static void da850_evm_bb_expander_teardown(struct i2c_client *client,
+					   unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio, void *c)
 {
 	platform_device_unregister(&da850_evm_bb_leds_device);
 	platform_device_unregister(&da850_evm_bb_keys_device);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static struct pca953x_platform_data da850_evm_ui_expander_info = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index 08bc52c3cdcb..3eedeac9ec8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -1099,20 +1099,15 @@  static int pca953x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct pca953x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
 	struct pca953x_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
-	int ret;
 
 	if (pdata && pdata->teardown) {
-		ret = pdata->teardown(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
-				      chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			dev_err(&client->dev, "teardown failed, %d\n", ret);
-	} else {
-		ret = 0;
+		pdata->teardown(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
+				chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
 	}
 
 	regulator_disable(chip->regulator);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h b/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h
index 4eb53e023997..96c1a14ab365 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/pca953x.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@  struct pca953x_platform_data {
 	int		(*setup)(struct i2c_client *client,
 				unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio,
 				void *context);
-	int		(*teardown)(struct i2c_client *client,
+	void		(*teardown)(struct i2c_client *client,
 				unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio,
 				void *context);
 	const char	*const *names;