diff mbox

HID: cp2112: fix to force single data-report reply

Message ID 1434867625-3062-1-git-send-email-borneo.antonio@gmail.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Antonio Borneo June 21, 2015, 6:20 a.m. UTC
Current implementation of cp2112_raw_event() only accepts one data
report at a time. If last received data report is not fully handled
yet, a new incoming data report will overwrite it. In such case we
don't guaranteed to propagate the correct incoming data.

The trivial fix implemented here forces a single report at a time
by requesting in cp2112_read() no more than 61 byte of data, which
is the payload size of a single data report.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
---

Hi Jiri,

I think this should go through linux-stable.

Thanks,
Antonio

 drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Ellen Wang July 1, 2015, 8:05 a.m. UTC | #1
Works as described.  Thank you!

By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 
chip, and it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.

On 06/20/2015 11:20 PM, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> Current implementation of cp2112_raw_event() only accepts one data
> report at a time. If last received data report is not fully handled
> yet, a new incoming data report will overwrite it. In such case we
> don't guaranteed to propagate the correct incoming data.
>
> The trivial fix implemented here forces a single report at a time
> by requesting in cp2112_read() no more than 61 byte of data, which
> is the payload size of a single data report.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> I think this should go through linux-stable.
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
>   drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c b/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c
> index 3318de6..a2dbbbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c
> @@ -356,6 +356,8 @@ static int cp2112_read(struct cp2112_device *dev, u8 *data, size_t size)
>   	struct cp2112_force_read_report report;
>   	int ret;
>
> +	if (size > sizeof(dev->read_data))
> +		size = sizeof(dev->read_data);
>   	report.report = CP2112_DATA_READ_FORCE_SEND;
>   	report.length = cpu_to_be16(size);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jiri Kosina July 8, 2015, 9:15 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:

> Works as described.  Thank you!
> 
> By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip, and
> it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.

Ellen, are you okay with me applying the patch with

	Tested-by: Ellen Wang <ellen@cumulusnetworks.com>

?

Thanks,
Ellen Wang July 8, 2015, 10:24 a.m. UTC | #3
On 07/08/2015 02:15 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:
>
>> Works as described.  Thank you!
>>
>> By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip, and
>> it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
>
> Ellen, are you okay with me applying the patch with
>
> 	Tested-by: Ellen Wang <ellen@cumulusnetworks.com>
>
> ?
>
> Thanks,

Yes.  Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jiri Kosina July 8, 2015, 10:41 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:

> > > Works as described.  Thank you!
> > > 
> > > By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip,
> > > and
> > > it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
> > 
> > Ellen, are you okay with me applying the patch with
> > 
> > 	Tested-by: Ellen Wang <ellen@cumulusnetworks.com>
> > 
> > ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> Yes.  Thank you.

Ammended with Cc: stable tag, and applied to for-4.2/upstream-fixes. 
Thanks,
Antonio Borneo July 11, 2015, 11:48 a.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:
>
>> > > Works as described.  Thank you!
>> > >
>> > > By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip,
>> > > and
>> > > it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
>> >
>> > Ellen, are you okay with me applying the patch with
>> >
>> >     Tested-by: Ellen Wang <ellen@cumulusnetworks.com>
>> >
>> > ?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>>
>> Yes.  Thank you.
>
> Ammended with Cc: stable tag, and applied to for-4.2/upstream-fixes.
> Thanks,

Thanks!

Antonio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c b/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c
index 3318de6..a2dbbbe 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-cp2112.c
@@ -356,6 +356,8 @@  static int cp2112_read(struct cp2112_device *dev, u8 *data, size_t size)
 	struct cp2112_force_read_report report;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (size > sizeof(dev->read_data))
+		size = sizeof(dev->read_data);
 	report.report = CP2112_DATA_READ_FORCE_SEND;
 	report.length = cpu_to_be16(size);