| Message ID | 06d77099-63fc-cf0f-f8a3-3bcef864f40a@axentia.se |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [PULL,REQUEST] i2c-mux for 4.19-rc1 | expand |
Hi Peter, > Just the one cleanup patch left for me this cycle, all other i2c-mux > work that I'm aware of went in by other means due to interactions with > more important trees. Crap, it's hard to write a summary of so little, > here's my attempt: :) > Simplify the probe function of the pca954x driver. Thanks, pulled! Could you update the status of the patches assigned to you in patchwork, too? That would be great. Thanks! Regards, Wolfram
On 2018-08-04 23:09, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Peter, > >> Just the one cleanup patch left for me this cycle, all other i2c-mux >> work that I'm aware of went in by other means due to interactions with >> more important trees. Crap, it's hard to write a summary of so little, >> here's my attempt: > > :) > >> Simplify the probe function of the pca954x driver. > > Thanks, pulled! > > Could you update the status of the patches assigned to you in patchwork, > too? That would be great. Thanks! Ok, I updated one patch, for three patches I'm waiting for tags and plan to resend during the next cycle, and for the remaining three I have tags but would like to have some test results from someone with a pca9641 but there are no real good status for that in the list. In the end I think I'll pick the first two in that last series for the next cycle even without testing because they are good on their own and not really related to the pca9641... BTW, I occasionally mark superseded patches as such, even though they are not related to i2c-mux. I hope that's ok? Or do you want me to just leave it for you? Cheers, Peter
> Ok, I updated one patch, for three patches I'm waiting for tags and plan > to resend during the next cycle, and for the remaining three I have tags but > would like to have some test results from someone with a pca9641 but there Good. Thanks for the heads up! > BTW, I occasionally mark superseded patches as such, even though they are > not related to i2c-mux. I hope that's ok? Or do you want me to just leave > it for you? It is totally OK. Even welcome :)
Hi Wolfram, Just the one cleanup patch left for me this cycle, all other i2c-mux work that I'm aware of went in by other means due to interactions with more important trees. Crap, it's hard to write a summary of so little, here's my attempt: Simplify the probe function of the pca954x driver. Cheers, Peter The following changes since commit d72e90f33aa4709ebecc5005562f52335e106a60: Linux 4.18-rc6 (2018-07-22 14:12:20 -0700) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git i2c-mux/for-next for you to fetch changes up to 6856909ce542ddea39f9dfc8429b26b3bb0a9e8b: i2c: mux: pca954x: use helper variable in probe (2018-07-30 10:13:30 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Linus Walleij (1): i2c: mux: pca954x: use helper variable in probe drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)