| Message ID | ca55f568da9a5be30700623697f7d398c149cda3.1550608440.git.sramani@mellanox.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/1] gpio: add driver for Mellanox BlueField GPIO controller | expand |
wt., 19 lut 2019 o 21:55 Shravan Kumar Ramani <sramani@mellanox.com> napisał(a): > > This patch adds support for the GPIO controller used by Mellanox > BlueField SOCs. > Thanks for addressing the issues. A couple more things I missed the last time are below. > Reviewed-by: David Woods <dwoods@mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <sramani@mellanox.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 253 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > index b5a2845..c950fe8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > @@ -1292,6 +1292,12 @@ config GPIO_MERRIFIELD > help > Say Y here to support Intel Merrifield GPIO. > > +config GPIO_MLXBF > + tristate "Mellanox BlueField SoC GPIO" > + depends on (MELLANOX_PLATFORM && ARM64 && ACPI) || COMPILE_TEST > + help > + Say Y here if you want GPIO support on Mellanox BlueField SoC. > + > config GPIO_ML_IOH > tristate "OKI SEMICONDUCTOR ML7213 IOH GPIO support" > depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile > index 37628f8..8d54279 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MENZ127) += gpio-menz127.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MERRIFIELD) += gpio-merrifield.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MC33880) += gpio-mc33880.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MC9S08DZ60) += gpio-mc9s08dz60.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MLXBF) += gpio-mlxbf.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ML_IOH) += gpio-ml-ioh.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MM_LANTIQ) += gpio-mm-lantiq.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MOCKUP) += gpio-mockup.o > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..bf197aa > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c > @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > +#include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/ioport.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/moduleparam.h> > +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> The two headers above are not needed - you neither define any module params nor use any pinctrl consumer API. > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/pm.h> > +#include <linux/resource.h> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > +#include <linux/version.h> > + > +/* Number of pins on BlueField */ > +#define MLXBF_GPIO_NR 54 The naming convention for symbols is not consistent. Could you use mlxbf_gpio_ prefix for all symbols in this driver? Uppercase for defines and lowercase for functions and structures. > + > +/* Pad Electrical Controls. */ > +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL__FIRST_WORD 0x0700 > +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_1__FIRST_WORD 0x0708 > +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_2__FIRST_WORD 0x0710 > +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_3__FIRST_WORD 0x0718 > + > +#define GPIO_PIN_DIR_I 0x1040 > +#define GPIO_PIN_DIR_O 0x1048 > +#define GPIO_PIN_STATE 0x1000 > +#define GPIO_SCRATCHPAD 0x20 > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > +struct bluefield_context_save_regs { > + u64 gpio_scratchpad; > + u64 gpio_pad_control[MLXBF_GPIO_NR]; > + u64 gpio_pin_dir_i; > + u64 gpio_pin_dir_o; > +}; > +#endif > + > +/* Device state structure. */ > +struct gpio_state { > + struct gpio_chip gc; > + > + /* Must hold this lock to modify shared data. */ > + spinlock_t lock; > + > + /* Memory Address */ > + void __iomem *dc_base; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > + struct bluefield_context_save_regs csave_regs; > +#endif > +}; > + > +static int gpio_bf_set_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + u64 in; > + u64 out; > + > + out = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); > + in = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); > + > + writeq(out & ~BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); > + writeq(in | BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gpio_bf_set_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + u64 in; > + u64 out; > + > + out = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); > + in = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); > + > + writeq(out | BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); > + writeq(in & ~BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gpio_bf_set_output_lock(struct gpio_chip *chip, > + unsigned int offset, int value) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > + spin_lock(&gs->lock); > + gpio_bf_set_output(chip, offset); There's no reason to split these functions into locked and unlocked parts - please merge them. > + spin_unlock(&gs->lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gpio_bf_set_input_lock(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > + spin_lock(&gs->lock); > + gpio_bf_set_input(chip, offset); > + spin_unlock(&gs->lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gpio_bf_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + u64 value; > + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > + value = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_STATE); No spinlock here? > + > + return (value >> offset) & 1; > +} > + > +static void gpio_bf_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value) > +{ > + u64 data; > + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > + spin_lock(&gs->lock); > + data = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_STATE); > + > + if (value) > + data |= BIT(offset); > + else > + data &= ~BIT(offset); > + writeq(data, gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_STATE); > + spin_unlock(&gs->lock); > +} > + > +static int gpiodrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct gpio_chip *gc; > + struct resource *dc_res; > + int ret; > + > + dc_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); No need to check the return value - just call platform_get_resource() and pass the return value to devm_ioremap_resource() in the next line. Grep for devm_ioremap_resource() and you'll see how it's used. > + if (!dc_res) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + gs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct gpio_state), GFP_KERNEL); Should be sizeof(*gs). > + if (!gs) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + gs->dc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, dc_res); > + if (!gs->dc_base) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + gc = &gs->gc; > + gc->direction_input = gpio_bf_set_input_lock; > + gc->get = gpio_bf_get; > + gc->direction_output = gpio_bf_set_output_lock; > + gc->set = gpio_bf_set; > + gc->label = dev_name(dev); > + gc->parent = &pdev->dev; > + gc->owner = THIS_MODULE; > + gc->base = 0; Are you sure you want to enforce the base to be 0? If you want it assigned automatically, it should be -1. > + gc->ngpio = MLXBF_GPIO_NR; > + > + ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &gs->gc, gs); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed adding memory mapped gpiochip\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + > + spin_lock_init(&gs->lock); > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gs); > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "registered Mellanox BlueField GPIO"); > + return 0; > + > +err: > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Probe, Failed\n"); No need for this, the device driver subsystem will log the failure. > + return ret; > +} > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > +static int gpiodrv_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_scratchpad = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_SCRATCHPAD); > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[0] = > + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL__FIRST_WORD); > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[1] = > + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_1__FIRST_WORD); > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[2] = > + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_2__FIRST_WORD); > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[3] = > + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_3__FIRST_WORD); > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_i = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); > + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_o = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gpiodrv_resume(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct gpio_state *gs = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_scratchpad, gs->dc_base + GPIO_SCRATCHPAD); > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[0], gs->dc_base + > + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL__FIRST_WORD); > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[1], gs->dc_base + > + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_1__FIRST_WORD); > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[2], gs->dc_base + > + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_2__FIRST_WORD); > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[3], gs->dc_base + > + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_3__FIRST_WORD); > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_i, gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); > + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_o, gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); > + > + return 0; > +} > +#endif > + > +static const struct acpi_device_id gpiodrv_acpi_match[] = { > + { "MLNXBF02", 0 }, > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, gpiodrv_acpi_match); > + > +static struct platform_driver gpiodrv_gpio_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "gpiodrv", > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(gpiodrv_acpi_match), > + }, > + .probe = gpiodrv_probe, > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > + .suspend = gpiodrv_suspend, > + .resume = gpiodrv_resume, > +#endif > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver(gpiodrv_gpio_driver); > + > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mellanox BlueField GPIO Driver"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Mellanox Technologies"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > -- > 2.1.2 > Bart
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig index b5a2845..c950fe8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig @@ -1292,6 +1292,12 @@ config GPIO_MERRIFIELD help Say Y here to support Intel Merrifield GPIO. +config GPIO_MLXBF + tristate "Mellanox BlueField SoC GPIO" + depends on (MELLANOX_PLATFORM && ARM64 && ACPI) || COMPILE_TEST + help + Say Y here if you want GPIO support on Mellanox BlueField SoC. + config GPIO_ML_IOH tristate "OKI SEMICONDUCTOR ML7213 IOH GPIO support" depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile index 37628f8..8d54279 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MENZ127) += gpio-menz127.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MERRIFIELD) += gpio-merrifield.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MC33880) += gpio-mc33880.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MC9S08DZ60) += gpio-mc9s08dz60.o +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MLXBF) += gpio-mlxbf.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ML_IOH) += gpio-ml-ioh.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MM_LANTIQ) += gpio-mm-lantiq.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MOCKUP) += gpio-mockup.o diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf197aa --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf.c @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/ioport.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/pm.h> +#include <linux/resource.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/version.h> + +/* Number of pins on BlueField */ +#define MLXBF_GPIO_NR 54 + +/* Pad Electrical Controls. */ +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL__FIRST_WORD 0x0700 +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_1__FIRST_WORD 0x0708 +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_2__FIRST_WORD 0x0710 +#define GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_3__FIRST_WORD 0x0718 + +#define GPIO_PIN_DIR_I 0x1040 +#define GPIO_PIN_DIR_O 0x1048 +#define GPIO_PIN_STATE 0x1000 +#define GPIO_SCRATCHPAD 0x20 + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +struct bluefield_context_save_regs { + u64 gpio_scratchpad; + u64 gpio_pad_control[MLXBF_GPIO_NR]; + u64 gpio_pin_dir_i; + u64 gpio_pin_dir_o; +}; +#endif + +/* Device state structure. */ +struct gpio_state { + struct gpio_chip gc; + + /* Must hold this lock to modify shared data. */ + spinlock_t lock; + + /* Memory Address */ + void __iomem *dc_base; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + struct bluefield_context_save_regs csave_regs; +#endif +}; + +static int gpio_bf_set_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + u64 in; + u64 out; + + out = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); + in = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); + + writeq(out & ~BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); + writeq(in | BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); + + return 0; +} + +static int gpio_bf_set_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + u64 in; + u64 out; + + out = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); + in = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); + + writeq(out | BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); + writeq(in & ~BIT(offset), gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); + + return 0; +} + +static int gpio_bf_set_output_lock(struct gpio_chip *chip, + unsigned int offset, int value) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + + spin_lock(&gs->lock); + gpio_bf_set_output(chip, offset); + spin_unlock(&gs->lock); + + return 0; +} + +static int gpio_bf_set_input_lock(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + + spin_lock(&gs->lock); + gpio_bf_set_input(chip, offset); + spin_unlock(&gs->lock); + + return 0; +} + +static int gpio_bf_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) +{ + u64 value; + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + + value = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_STATE); + + return (value >> offset) & 1; +} + +static void gpio_bf_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value) +{ + u64 data; + struct gpio_state *gs = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + + spin_lock(&gs->lock); + data = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_STATE); + + if (value) + data |= BIT(offset); + else + data &= ~BIT(offset); + writeq(data, gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_STATE); + spin_unlock(&gs->lock); +} + +static int gpiodrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct gpio_chip *gc; + struct resource *dc_res; + int ret; + + dc_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + if (!dc_res) + return -EINVAL; + + gs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct gpio_state), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!gs) + return -ENOMEM; + + gs->dc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, dc_res); + if (!gs->dc_base) + return -ENOMEM; + + gc = &gs->gc; + gc->direction_input = gpio_bf_set_input_lock; + gc->get = gpio_bf_get; + gc->direction_output = gpio_bf_set_output_lock; + gc->set = gpio_bf_set; + gc->label = dev_name(dev); + gc->parent = &pdev->dev; + gc->owner = THIS_MODULE; + gc->base = 0; + gc->ngpio = MLXBF_GPIO_NR; + + ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &gs->gc, gs); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed adding memory mapped gpiochip\n"); + goto err; + } + + spin_lock_init(&gs->lock); + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gs); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "registered Mellanox BlueField GPIO"); + return 0; + +err: + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Probe, Failed\n"); + return ret; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +static int gpiodrv_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + gs->csave_regs.gpio_scratchpad = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_SCRATCHPAD); + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[0] = + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL__FIRST_WORD); + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[1] = + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_1__FIRST_WORD); + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[2] = + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_2__FIRST_WORD); + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[3] = + readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_3__FIRST_WORD); + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_i = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); + gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_o = readq(gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); + + return 0; +} + +static int gpiodrv_resume(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct gpio_state *gs = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_scratchpad, gs->dc_base + GPIO_SCRATCHPAD); + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[0], gs->dc_base + + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL__FIRST_WORD); + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[1], gs->dc_base + + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_1__FIRST_WORD); + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[2], gs->dc_base + + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_2__FIRST_WORD); + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pad_control[3], gs->dc_base + + GPIO_PAD_CONTROL_3__FIRST_WORD); + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_i, gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_I); + writeq(gs->csave_regs.gpio_pin_dir_o, gs->dc_base + GPIO_PIN_DIR_O); + + return 0; +} +#endif + +static const struct acpi_device_id gpiodrv_acpi_match[] = { + { "MLNXBF02", 0 }, + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, gpiodrv_acpi_match); + +static struct platform_driver gpiodrv_gpio_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "gpiodrv", + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(gpiodrv_acpi_match), + }, + .probe = gpiodrv_probe, +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + .suspend = gpiodrv_suspend, + .resume = gpiodrv_resume, +#endif +}; + +module_platform_driver(gpiodrv_gpio_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mellanox BlueField GPIO Driver"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Mellanox Technologies"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");