diff mbox

[v4,5/7] pinctrl: aramda-37xx: Add irqchip support

Message ID 70ffe3343c13d01737bf74e5de4898d0c0be07a0.1491405475.git-series.gregory.clement@free-electrons.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Gregory CLEMENT April 5, 2017, 3:18 p.m. UTC
The Armada 37xx SoCs can handle interrupt through GPIO. However it can
only manage the edge ones.

The way the interrupt are managed are classical so we can use the generic
interrupt chip model.

The only unusual "feature" is that many interrupts are connected to the
parent interrupt controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
the chained irq with all of them.

Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 221 insertions(+)

Comments

Gregory CLEMENT April 5, 2017, 4:03 p.m. UTC | #1
Argh, I sill have the typo in the title of this patch! :(

If you are going to apply it could you fix it, else it will be fixed in
the next version.

Sorry,

Gregory

 
 On mer., avril 05 2017, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> The Armada 37xx SoCs can handle interrupt through GPIO. However it can
> only manage the edge ones.
>
> The way the interrupt are managed are classical so we can use the generic
> interrupt chip model.
>
> The only unusual "feature" is that many interrupts are connected to the
> parent interrupt controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> the chained irq with all of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 221 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> index 5c96f5558310..7356516e0921 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
>  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> @@ -30,6 +32,11 @@
>  #define OUTPUT_CTL	0x20
>  #define SELECTION	0x30
>  
> +#define IRQ_EN		0x0
> +#define IRQ_POL		0x08
> +#define IRQ_STATUS	0x10
> +#define IRQ_WKUP	0x18
> +
>  #define NB_FUNCS 2
>  #define GPIO_PER_REG	32
>  
> @@ -75,9 +82,12 @@ struct armada_37xx_pmx_func {
>  
>  struct armada_37xx_pinctrl {
>  	struct regmap			*regmap;
> +	void __iomem			*base;
>  	const struct armada_37xx_pin_data	*data;
>  	struct device			*dev;
>  	struct gpio_chip		gpio_chip;
> +	struct irq_chip			irq_chip;
> +	spinlock_t			irq_lock;
>  	struct pinctrl_desc		pctl;
>  	struct pinctrl_dev		*pctl_dev;
>  	struct armada_37xx_pin_group	*groups;
> @@ -346,6 +356,14 @@ static int armada_37xx_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  	return armada_37xx_pmx_set_by_name(pctldev, name, grp);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(unsigned int *reg,
> +					  struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	armada_37xx_update_reg(reg, offset);
> +}
> +
>  static int armada_37xx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  					    unsigned int offset)
>  {
> @@ -468,6 +486,206 @@ static const struct gpio_chip armada_37xx_gpiolib_chip = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> +void armada_37xx_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	u32 reg = IRQ_STATUS, mask = d->mask;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +	writel(mask, info->base + reg);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void armada_37xx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	u32 val, reg = IRQ_EN, mask = d->mask;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +	val = readl(info->base + reg);
> +	writel(val & ~mask, info->base + reg);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void armada_37xx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	u32 val, reg = IRQ_EN, mask = d->mask;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +	val = readl(info->base + reg);
> +	writel(val | mask, info->base + reg);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int armada_37xx_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	u32 val, reg = IRQ_WKUP, mask = d->mask;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +	val = readl(info->base + reg);
> +	if (on)
> +		val |= mask;
> +	else
> +		val &= ~mask;
> +	writel(val, info->base + reg);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int armada_37xx_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	u32 val, reg = IRQ_POL, mask = d->mask;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
> +	val = readl(info->base + reg);
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> +		val &= ~mask;
> +		break;
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> +		val |= mask;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	writel(val, info->base + reg);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void armada_37xx_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +	struct irq_domain *d = gc->irqdomain;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +	for (i = 0; i <= d->revmap_size / GPIO_PER_REG; i++) {
> +		u32 status;
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +		status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
> +		/* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
> +		status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +		while (status) {
> +			u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
> +			u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
> +						     i * GPIO_PER_REG);
> +
> +			generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +			status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +					struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = info->dev->of_node;
> +	int nrirqs = info->data->nr_pins;
> +	struct gpio_chip *gc = &info->gpio_chip;
> +	struct irq_chip *irqchip = &info->irq_chip;
> +	struct resource res;
> +	int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(info->dev->of_node, np) {
> +		if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
> +			ret = 0;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	};
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np);
> +	spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock);
> +
> +	if (!nr_irq_parent) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid or no IRQ\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (of_address_to_resource(info->dev->of_node, 1, &res)) {
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "cannot find IO resource\n");
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	info->base = devm_ioremap_resource(info->dev, &res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(info->base);
> +
> +	irqchip->irq_ack = armada_37xx_irq_ack;
> +	irqchip->irq_mask = armada_37xx_irq_mask;
> +	irqchip->irq_unmask = armada_37xx_irq_unmask;
> +	irqchip->irq_set_wake = armada_37xx_irq_set_wake;
> +	irqchip->irq_set_type = armada_37xx_irq_set_type;
> +	irqchip->name = info->data->name;
> +
> +	ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(gc, irqchip, 0,
> +				   handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Many interrupts are connected to the parent interrupt
> +	 * controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> +	 * the chained irq with all of them.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nrirqs; i++) {
> +		struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(gc->irq_base + i);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The mask field is a "precomputed bitmask for
> +		 * accessing the chip registers" which was introduced
> +		 * for the generic irqchip framework. As we don't use
> +		 * this framework, we can reuse this field for our own
> +		 * usage.
> +		 */
> +		d->mask = BIT(i % GPIO_PER_REG);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_parent; i++) {
> +		int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
> +
> +		if (irq < 0)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(gc, irqchip, irq,
> +					     armada_37xx_irq_handler);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  					struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
>  {
> @@ -496,6 +714,9 @@ static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gc, info);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> +	ret = armada_37xx_irqchip_register(pdev, info);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> git-series 0.9.1
Linus Walleij April 24, 2017, 12:14 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
<gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> The Armada 37xx SoCs can handle interrupt through GPIO. However it can
> only manage the edge ones.
>
> The way the interrupt are managed are classical so we can use the generic
> interrupt chip model.
>
> The only unusual "feature" is that many interrupts are connected to the
> parent interrupt controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> the chained irq with all of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

There are some issues with this patch.

First:
You need to add
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
to the Kconfig entry. It's only working in your setup
because something else is selecting this for you, probably.

At all places like this:

> +       u32 mask = d->mask;
(...)
> +       if (on)
> +               val |= mask;
> +       else
> +               val &= ~mask;

Isn't it simpler to just use d->mask directly in the code and skip the local
variable?

if (on)
  val |= d->mask;
(...)

> +static void armada_37xx_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +       struct irq_domain *d = gc->irqdomain;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +       for (i = 0; i <= d->revmap_size / GPIO_PER_REG; i++) {
> +               u32 status;
> +               unsigned long flags;
> +
> +               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +               status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
> +               /* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
> +               status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
> +               while (status) {
> +                       u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
> +                       u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
> +                                                    i * GPIO_PER_REG);
> +
> +                       generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +                       status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> +               }

You hae a problem here is a new IRQ appears while you are inside
of this loop. You need to re-read the status register for each iteration
(and &= with the IRQ_EN I guess).

> +static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +                                       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
> +{
> +       struct device_node *np = info->dev->of_node;
> +       int nrirqs = info->data->nr_pins;
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = &info->gpio_chip;
> +       struct irq_chip *irqchip = &info->irq_chip;
> +       struct resource res;
> +       int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
> +

This warrants a comment:
/* Check if we have at least one gpio-controller child node */

> +       for_each_child_of_node(info->dev->of_node, np) {
> +               if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
> +                       ret = 0;
> +                       break;
> +               }

Rewrite:

if (of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-controller"))

> +       };
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;


> +
> +       nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np);
> +       spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock);
> +
> +       if (!nr_irq_parent) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid or no IRQ\n");
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (of_address_to_resource(info->dev->of_node, 1, &res)) {
> +               dev_err(info->dev, "cannot find IO resource\n");
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +       }
> +
> +       info->base = devm_ioremap_resource(info->dev, &res);
> +       if (IS_ERR(info->base))
> +               return PTR_ERR(info->base);
> +
> +       irqchip->irq_ack = armada_37xx_irq_ack;
> +       irqchip->irq_mask = armada_37xx_irq_mask;
> +       irqchip->irq_unmask = armada_37xx_irq_unmask;
> +       irqchip->irq_set_wake = armada_37xx_irq_set_wake;
> +       irqchip->irq_set_type = armada_37xx_irq_set_type;
> +       irqchip->name = info->data->name;
> +
> +       ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(gc, irqchip, 0,
> +                                  handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_info(&pdev->dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Many interrupts are connected to the parent interrupt
> +        * controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
> +        * the chained irq with all of them.
> +        */
> +       for (i = 0; i < nrirqs; i++) {
> +               struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(gc->irq_base + i);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * The mask field is a "precomputed bitmask for
> +                * accessing the chip registers" which was introduced
> +                * for the generic irqchip framework. As we don't use
> +                * this framework, we can reuse this field for our own
> +                * usage.
> +                */
> +               d->mask = BIT(i % GPIO_PER_REG);
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_parent; i++) {
> +               int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
> +
> +               if (irq < 0)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(gc, irqchip, irq,
> +                                            armada_37xx_irq_handler);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                                         struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
>  {
> @@ -496,6 +714,9 @@ static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gc, info);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> +       ret = armada_37xx_irqchip_register(pdev, info);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> git-series 0.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Linus Walleij April 24, 2017, 12:16 p.m. UTC | #3
So I touched something in gmail and it shot off the mail prematurely.
My apologies.

But my review was done anyways.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Gregory CLEMENT April 26, 2017, 9:23 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Linus,
 
 On lun., avril 24 2017, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
> <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
>> The Armada 37xx SoCs can handle interrupt through GPIO. However it can
>> only manage the edge ones.
>>
>> The way the interrupt are managed are classical so we can use the generic
>> interrupt chip model.
>>
>> The only unusual "feature" is that many interrupts are connected to the
>> parent interrupt controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
>> the chained irq with all of them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
>
> There are some issues with this patch.
>
> First:
> You need to add
> select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> to the Kconfig entry. It's only working in your setup
> because something else is selecting this for you, probably.

It is done in patch 2 "arm64: marvell: enable the Armada 37xx pinctrl
driver".

>
> At all places like this:
>
>> +       u32 mask = d->mask;
> (...)
>> +       if (on)
>> +               val |= mask;
>> +       else
>> +               val &= ~mask;
>
> Isn't it simpler to just use d->mask directly in the code and skip the local
> variable?
>
> if (on)
>   val |= d->mask;
> (...)

Yes sure I cand do it.

>
>> +static void armada_37xx_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>> +       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>> +       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +       struct irq_domain *d = gc->irqdomain;
>> +       int i;
>> +
>> +       chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>> +       for (i = 0; i <= d->revmap_size / GPIO_PER_REG; i++) {
>> +               u32 status;
>> +               unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
>> +               status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
>> +               /* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
>> +               status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
>> +               while (status) {
>> +                       u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
>> +                       u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
>> +                                                    i * GPIO_PER_REG);
>> +
>> +                       generic_handle_irq(virq);
>> +                       status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
>> +               }
>
> You hae a problem here is a new IRQ appears while you are inside
> of this loop. You need to re-read the status register for each iteration
> (and &= with the IRQ_EN I guess).

If a new IRQ appears during the loop, then the irq handler will be
called again because the cause of this new IRQ won't have been acked
yet. So I think we're fine here.

>
>> +static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> +                                       struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
>> +{
>> +       struct device_node *np = info->dev->of_node;
>> +       int nrirqs = info->data->nr_pins;
>> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = &info->gpio_chip;
>> +       struct irq_chip *irqchip = &info->irq_chip;
>> +       struct resource res;
>> +       int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
>> +
>
> This warrants a comment:
> /* Check if we have at least one gpio-controller child node */
>

OK

>> +       for_each_child_of_node(info->dev->of_node, np) {
>> +               if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
>> +                       ret = 0;
>> +                       break;
>> +               }
>
> Rewrite:
>
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-controller"))
>

OK


Gregory
Linus Walleij April 26, 2017, 12:03 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Gregory CLEMENT
<gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>  On lun., avril 24 2017, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

>>> +               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
>>> +               status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
>>> +               /* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
>>> +               status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
>>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
>>> +               while (status) {
>>> +                       u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
>>> +                       u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
>>> +                                                    i * GPIO_PER_REG);
>>> +
>>> +                       generic_handle_irq(virq);
>>> +                       status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
>>> +               }
>>
>> You hae a problem here is a new IRQ appears while you are inside
>> of this loop. You need to re-read the status register for each iteration
>> (and &= with the IRQ_EN I guess).
>
> If a new IRQ appears during the loop, then the irq handler will be
> called again because the cause of this new IRQ won't have been acked
> yet. So I think we're fine here.

That *might* be true. It is true if the CPU gets a level IRQ from the
GPIO controller. But hardware dealing with edge IRQs can be very
quirky here, and just send a pulse on the line to the CPU if the
CPU-bound IRQ is also just edge triggered. And then that
pulse would potentially be missed while dealing with the current
IRQ in this handler. (And exactly this happened to us on other
hardware.)

But anyway: why let the irq handler be called again if you can avoid it?

You would avoid a double context switch by just checking it again
in the loop before exiting the handler. And that can be really nice
for latency-sensitive stuff.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Gregory CLEMENT April 26, 2017, 1:12 p.m. UTC | #6
Hi Linus,
 
 On mer., avril 26 2017, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Gregory CLEMENT
> <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>>  On lun., avril 24 2017, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>>> +               spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
>>>> +               status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
>>>> +               /* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
>>>> +               status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
>>>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
>>>> +               while (status) {
>>>> +                       u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
>>>> +                       u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
>>>> +                                                    i * GPIO_PER_REG);
>>>> +
>>>> +                       generic_handle_irq(virq);
>>>> +                       status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
>>>> +               }
>>>
>>> You hae a problem here is a new IRQ appears while you are inside
>>> of this loop. You need to re-read the status register for each iteration
>>> (and &= with the IRQ_EN I guess).
>>
>> If a new IRQ appears during the loop, then the irq handler will be
>> called again because the cause of this new IRQ won't have been acked
>> yet. So I think we're fine here.
>
> That *might* be true. It is true if the CPU gets a level IRQ from the
> GPIO controller. But hardware dealing with edge IRQs can be very
> quirky here, and just send a pulse on the line to the CPU if the
> CPU-bound IRQ is also just edge triggered. And then that
> pulse would potentially be missed while dealing with the current
> IRQ in this handler. (And exactly this happened to us on other
> hardware.)

OK thanks for sharing your experience, you convinced me, I am going to
send a new version of the patch with this fix.


>
> But anyway: why let the irq handler be called again if you can avoid
> it?
> You would avoid a double context switch by just checking it again
> in the loop before exiting the handler. And that can be really nice
> for latency-sensitive stuff.


I wanted to avoid an uncached access in each loop if it was not
necessary. But as we finally need it, I will do it.


Gregory



>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
index 5c96f5558310..7356516e0921 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ 
 #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
@@ -30,6 +32,11 @@ 
 #define OUTPUT_CTL	0x20
 #define SELECTION	0x30
 
+#define IRQ_EN		0x0
+#define IRQ_POL		0x08
+#define IRQ_STATUS	0x10
+#define IRQ_WKUP	0x18
+
 #define NB_FUNCS 2
 #define GPIO_PER_REG	32
 
@@ -75,9 +82,12 @@  struct armada_37xx_pmx_func {
 
 struct armada_37xx_pinctrl {
 	struct regmap			*regmap;
+	void __iomem			*base;
 	const struct armada_37xx_pin_data	*data;
 	struct device			*dev;
 	struct gpio_chip		gpio_chip;
+	struct irq_chip			irq_chip;
+	spinlock_t			irq_lock;
 	struct pinctrl_desc		pctl;
 	struct pinctrl_dev		*pctl_dev;
 	struct armada_37xx_pin_group	*groups;
@@ -346,6 +356,14 @@  static int armada_37xx_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	return armada_37xx_pmx_set_by_name(pctldev, name, grp);
 }
 
+static inline void armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(unsigned int *reg,
+					  struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	int offset = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+	armada_37xx_update_reg(reg, offset);
+}
+
 static int armada_37xx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 					    unsigned int offset)
 {
@@ -468,6 +486,206 @@  static const struct gpio_chip armada_37xx_gpiolib_chip = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
+void armada_37xx_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	u32 reg = IRQ_STATUS, mask = d->mask;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+	writel(mask, info->base + reg);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
+void armada_37xx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	u32 val, reg = IRQ_EN, mask = d->mask;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+	val = readl(info->base + reg);
+	writel(val & ~mask, info->base + reg);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
+void armada_37xx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	u32 val, reg = IRQ_EN, mask = d->mask;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+	val = readl(info->base + reg);
+	writel(val | mask, info->base + reg);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int armada_37xx_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	u32 val, reg = IRQ_WKUP, mask = d->mask;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+	val = readl(info->base + reg);
+	if (on)
+		val |= mask;
+	else
+		val &= ~mask;
+	writel(val, info->base + reg);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int armada_37xx_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	u32 val, reg = IRQ_POL, mask = d->mask;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+	armada_37xx_irq_update_reg(&reg, d);
+	val = readl(info->base + reg);
+	switch (type) {
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
+		val &= ~mask;
+		break;
+	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
+		val |= mask;
+		break;
+	default:
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	writel(val, info->base + reg);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+
+static void armada_37xx_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+	struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	struct irq_domain *d = gc->irqdomain;
+	int i;
+
+	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
+	for (i = 0; i <= d->revmap_size / GPIO_PER_REG; i++) {
+		u32 status;
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+		status = readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_STATUS + 4 * i);
+		/* Manage only the interrupt that was enabled */
+		status &= readl_relaxed(info->base + IRQ_EN + 4 * i);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->irq_lock, flags);
+		while (status) {
+			u32 hwirq = ffs(status) - 1;
+			u32 virq = irq_find_mapping(d, hwirq +
+						     i * GPIO_PER_REG);
+
+			generic_handle_irq(virq);
+			status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
+		}
+	}
+	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
+}
+
+static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
+					struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = info->dev->of_node;
+	int nrirqs = info->data->nr_pins;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = &info->gpio_chip;
+	struct irq_chip *irqchip = &info->irq_chip;
+	struct resource res;
+	int ret = -ENODEV, i, nr_irq_parent;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(info->dev->of_node, np) {
+		if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
+			ret = 0;
+			break;
+		}
+	};
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np);
+	spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock);
+
+	if (!nr_irq_parent) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid or no IRQ\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (of_address_to_resource(info->dev->of_node, 1, &res)) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "cannot find IO resource\n");
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	info->base = devm_ioremap_resource(info->dev, &res);
+	if (IS_ERR(info->base))
+		return PTR_ERR(info->base);
+
+	irqchip->irq_ack = armada_37xx_irq_ack;
+	irqchip->irq_mask = armada_37xx_irq_mask;
+	irqchip->irq_unmask = armada_37xx_irq_unmask;
+	irqchip->irq_set_wake = armada_37xx_irq_set_wake;
+	irqchip->irq_set_type = armada_37xx_irq_set_type;
+	irqchip->name = info->data->name;
+
+	ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(gc, irqchip, 0,
+				   handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Many interrupts are connected to the parent interrupt
+	 * controller. But we do not take advantage of this and use
+	 * the chained irq with all of them.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < nrirqs; i++) {
+		struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(gc->irq_base + i);
+
+		/*
+		 * The mask field is a "precomputed bitmask for
+		 * accessing the chip registers" which was introduced
+		 * for the generic irqchip framework. As we don't use
+		 * this framework, we can reuse this field for our own
+		 * usage.
+		 */
+		d->mask = BIT(i % GPIO_PER_REG);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_parent; i++) {
+		int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
+
+		if (irq < 0)
+			continue;
+
+		gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(gc, irqchip, irq,
+					     armada_37xx_irq_handler);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
 					struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
 {
@@ -496,6 +714,9 @@  static int armada_37xx_gpiochip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gc, info);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
+	ret = armada_37xx_irqchip_register(pdev, info);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	return 0;
 }