diff mbox series

[v1,02/11] drm/tegra: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get

Message ID 20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-2-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series Get rid of [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() public APIs | expand

Commit Message

Dmitry Torokhov Sept. 5, 2022, 6:30 a.m. UTC
I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
[devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API. It may even
help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
gpios described by swnodes.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Comments

Andy Shevchenko Sept. 5, 2022, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API.

> It may even
> help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
> gpios described by swnodes.

I would remove this sentence from all commit messages since it's a
debatable thing and might even not happen, so the above is a pure
speculation.
Dmitry Torokhov Sept. 5, 2022, 7:37 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> > [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> > a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API.
> 
> > It may even
> > help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
> > gpios described by swnodes.
> 
> I would remove this sentence from all commit messages since it's a
> debatable thing and might even not happen, so the above is a pure
> speculation.

I have the patches. Granted, I had them since '19 ;) but I'm rebasing
them and going to push them. I need them to convert bunch of input
drivers away from platform data.

Thanks.
Linus Walleij Sept. 5, 2022, 9:03 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:37 PM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> > > [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> > > a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API.
> >
> > > It may even
> > > help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
> > > gpios described by swnodes.
> >
> > I would remove this sentence from all commit messages since it's a
> > debatable thing and might even not happen, so the above is a pure
> > speculation.
>
> I have the patches. Granted, I had them since '19 ;) but I'm rebasing
> them and going to push them. I need them to convert bunch of input
> drivers away from platform data.

That's good news!

Are you referring to this patch set mentioned in a discussion
from 2017 thru 2020?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20200826161222.GA1665100@dtor-ws/

I put aside GPIO descriptor conversion for input devices (keys, buttons)
in board files anticipating a swnode mechanism.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Dmitry Torokhov Sept. 5, 2022, 10:08 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:03:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:37 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> > > > [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> > > > a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API.
> > >
> > > > It may even
> > > > help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
> > > > gpios described by swnodes.
> > >
> > > I would remove this sentence from all commit messages since it's a
> > > debatable thing and might even not happen, so the above is a pure
> > > speculation.
> >
> > I have the patches. Granted, I had them since '19 ;) but I'm rebasing
> > them and going to push them. I need them to convert bunch of input
> > drivers away from platform data.
> 
> That's good news!
> 
> Are you referring to this patch set mentioned in a discussion
> from 2017 thru 2020?
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20200826161222.GA1665100@dtor-ws/
> 
> I put aside GPIO descriptor conversion for input devices (keys, buttons)
> in board files anticipating a swnode mechanism.

Yep, that one, exactly. It is taking a bit longer than I anticipated ;)

Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
index 47d26b5d9945..a8925dcd7edd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
@@ -133,11 +133,11 @@  int tegra_output_probe(struct tegra_output *output)
 		}
 	}
 
-	output->hpd_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(output->dev,
-						       output->of_node,
-						       "nvidia,hpd-gpio", 0,
-						       GPIOD_IN,
-						       "HDMI hotplug detect");
+	output->hpd_gpio = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(output->dev,
+					of_fwnode_handle(output->of_node),
+					"nvidia,hpd",
+					GPIOD_IN,
+					"HDMI hotplug detect");
 	if (IS_ERR(output->hpd_gpio)) {
 		if (PTR_ERR(output->hpd_gpio) != -ENOENT)
 			return PTR_ERR(output->hpd_gpio);