mbox

[GIT,PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window

Message ID 20170619144849.ltx2qny5v66od3ml@dell
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git ib-mfd-x86-v4.13

Message

Lee Jones June 19, 2017, 2:48 p.m. UTC
Enjoy!

The following changes since commit 2ea659a9ef488125eb46da6eb571de5eae5c43f6:

  Linux 4.12-rc1 (2017-05-13 13:19:49 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git ib-mfd-x86-v4.13

for you to fetch changes up to 94d68594a7b4fd2eec457f22110de644e1c4ee57:

  platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Remove first level IRQ unmask (2017-06-19 15:45:30 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Immutable branch between MFD and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window

----------------------------------------------------------------
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (6):
      mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Fix TMU interrupt index
      mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove thermal second level IRQs
      mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove second level IRQ for gpio device
      mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Utilize devm_* functions in driver probe
      mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use chained IRQs for second level IRQ chips
      platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Remove first level IRQ unmask

 drivers/gpio/gpio-wcove.c                |  14 +-
 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c       | 232 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_bxtwc_tmu.c   |   4 -
 drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c |   2 +-
 drivers/usb/typec/typec_wcove.c          |   2 +-
 include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h       |   5 +-
 6 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko June 19, 2017, 3:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> Enjoy!

Thanks!

I suppose this one kbuild bot doesn't complain about :-)

Darren, do we need it or we can survive until v4.13-rc1?

>
> The following changes since commit 2ea659a9ef488125eb46da6eb571de5eae5c43f6:
>
>   Linux 4.12-rc1 (2017-05-13 13:19:49 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git ib-mfd-x86-v4.13
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 94d68594a7b4fd2eec457f22110de644e1c4ee57:
>
>   platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Remove first level IRQ unmask (2017-06-19 15:45:30 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Immutable branch between MFD and X86 due for the v4.13 merge window
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (6):
>       mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Fix TMU interrupt index
>       mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove thermal second level IRQs
>       mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Remove second level IRQ for gpio device
>       mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Utilize devm_* functions in driver probe
>       mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Use chained IRQs for second level IRQ chips
>       platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Remove first level IRQ unmask
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-wcove.c                |  14 +-
>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c       | 232 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel_bxtwc_tmu.c   |   4 -
>  drivers/thermal/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/usb/typec/typec_wcove.c          |   2 +-
>  include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h       |   5 +-
>  6 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Darren Hart June 19, 2017, 7:54 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:08:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Enjoy!
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I suppose this one kbuild bot doesn't complain about :-)
> 
> Darren, do we need it or we can survive until v4.13-rc1?

I suggest merging it to a local branch for safe keeping and if we see
conflicts in subsequent patches, we can apply it. I doubt it will be a problem.