Message ID | 20160831082520.25962-2-woogyom.kim@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi Milo, On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:25:17PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote: > H3 PA5 pin is assigned for single PWM channel. > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi > index fdf9fdb..05d0c4b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi > @@ -360,6 +360,13 @@ > allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; > }; > > + pwm0_pin_a: pwm0@0 { > + allwinner,pins = "PA5"; > + allwinner,function = "pwm0"; > + allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>; > + allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; > + }; > + Is it used on any boards? If not, we have the policy of not merging the pinctrl nodes that are not used by anyone to avoid bloating the DT for no particular reason. Maxime
On 08/31/2016 05:33 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> + pwm0_pin_a: pwm0@0 { > This is the only possible configuration. You can drop the _a suffix > from the label, and @0 from the node name. OK, thanks for your review. Best regards, Milo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 09/01/2016 01:20 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Milo, > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:25:17PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote: >> H3 PA5 pin is assigned for single PWM channel. >> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> >> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@gmail.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi >> index fdf9fdb..05d0c4b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi >> @@ -360,6 +360,13 @@ >> allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; >> }; >> >> + pwm0_pin_a: pwm0@0 { >> + allwinner,pins = "PA5"; >> + allwinner,function = "pwm0"; >> + allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>; >> + allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; >> + }; >> + > > Is it used on any boards? > > If not, we have the policy of not merging the pinctrl nodes that are > not used by anyone to avoid bloating the DT for no particular reason. Yes, I have. It's Nano Pi M1 which was derived from Orange Pi PC. The board DTS is ready to be sent out, but I'm not sure which is better. a) Send new board DTS file in other patch thread [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PWM feature in Allwinner H3 [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 .. [PATCH v3 4/4] pwm: sunxi: Add H3 support [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support Or b) Include the DTS in next patch-set v3 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PWM feature in Allwinner H3 [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM controller node in H3 [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support ... I'd like to have your opinion. Best regards, Milo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:06:12PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote: > On 09/01/2016 01:20 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >Hi Milo, > > > >On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:25:17PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote: > >>H3 PA5 pin is assigned for single PWM channel. > >> > >>Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > >>Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > >>Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > >>Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > >>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > >>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@gmail.com> > >>--- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 7 +++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > >> > >>diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi > >>index fdf9fdb..05d0c4b 100644 > >>--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi > >>+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi > >>@@ -360,6 +360,13 @@ > >> allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; > >> }; > >> > >>+ pwm0_pin_a: pwm0@0 { > >>+ allwinner,pins = "PA5"; > >>+ allwinner,function = "pwm0"; > >>+ allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>; > >>+ allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; > >>+ }; > >>+ > > > >Is it used on any boards? > > > >If not, we have the policy of not merging the pinctrl nodes that are > >not used by anyone to avoid bloating the DT for no particular reason. > > Yes, I have. It's Nano Pi M1 which was derived from Orange Pi PC. > The board DTS is ready to be sent out, but I'm not sure which is better. > > a) Send new board DTS file in other patch thread > > [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PWM feature in Allwinner H3 > [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 > .. > [PATCH v3 4/4] pwm: sunxi: Add H3 support > > [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support > > Or > > b) Include the DTS in next patch-set v3 > [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PWM feature in Allwinner H3 > [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 > [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM controller node in H3 > [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support > ... Generally speaking, I'd prefer: [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: sunxi: Add H3 support [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM controller node in H3 (It's usually better to add support for something and then add it) And then [PATCH v1 1/2] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 [PATCH v1 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support However, judging from the board documentation, that pin is labelled as PWM1/GPIOA6, which means that they don't enforce any usage on that pin (as opposed to the pin 3 and 5 for example, which are forced to i2c0). In such a case, we also don't enforce anything, since any user should be able to use it for whatever he or she wants. Maxime
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi index fdf9fdb..05d0c4b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi @@ -360,6 +360,13 @@ allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; }; + pwm0_pin_a: pwm0@0 { + allwinner,pins = "PA5"; + allwinner,function = "pwm0"; + allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>; + allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; + }; + uart0_pins_a: uart0@0 { allwinner,pins = "PA4", "PA5"; allwinner,function = "uart0";
H3 PA5 pin is assigned for single PWM channel. Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@gmail.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)