[v2,2/2] ARM: sunxi: dt: Convert users to the PIO interrupts binding

The current DTs were setting the cell size to 2, but used the default xlate
function that was assuming an interrupt cell size of 1, leading to the
second part of the cell (the flags) being ignored, while we were having an
inconsistent binding between the interrupts and gpio (that could also be
used as interrupts).

That "binding" doesn't work either with newer SoCs that have multiple irq
banks.

Now that we fixed the pinctrl driver to handle this like it should always
have been handled, convert the DT users, and while we're at it, remove the
size-cells property of PIO that is completely useless.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi           | 3 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dts   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi               | 3 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi           | 3 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-cubietruck.dts | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-i12-tvbox.dts  | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi           | 3 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23-a33.dtsi       | 3 +--
 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> The current DTs were setting the cell size to 2, but used the default xlate
> function that was assuming an interrupt cell size of 1, leading to the
> second part of the cell (the flags) being ignored, while we were having an
> inconsistent binding between the interrupts and gpio (that could also be
> used as interrupts).
>
> That "binding" doesn't work either with newer SoCs that have multiple irq
> banks.
>
> Now that we fixed the pinctrl driver to handle this like it should always
> have been handled, convert the DT users, and while we're at it, remove the
> size-cells property of PIO that is completely useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I guess this will be merged through ARM SoC?

If you want me to carry it in pinctrl and you're *certain* it
will not collide with something else coming in from ARM SoC
then tell me ... prefer to even have ARM SoC maintainers
ACK on this actually.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:58:29PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > The current DTs were setting the cell size to 2, but used the default xlate
> > function that was assuming an interrupt cell size of 1, leading to the
> > second part of the cell (the flags) being ignored, while we were having an
> > inconsistent binding between the interrupts and gpio (that could also be
> > used as interrupts).
> >
> > That "binding" doesn't work either with newer SoCs that have multiple irq
> > banks.
> >
> > Now that we fixed the pinctrl driver to handle this like it should always
> > have been handled, convert the DT users, and while we're at it, remove the
> > size-cells property of PIO that is completely useless.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> I guess this will be merged through ARM SoC?
> 
> If you want me to carry it in pinctrl and you're *certain* it
> will not collide with something else coming in from ARM SoC
> then tell me ... prefer to even have ARM SoC maintainers
> ACK on this actually.

I'll merge it through my tree (and then arm-soc).

Thanks!
Maxime