| Message ID | 87eid2peb2.fsf@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > 'excpet' should be 'except'. > 'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'. > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> > --- > I found another one. > > diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c > index 940c961..533699c 100644 > --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c > @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ failed_out: > * the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after > * we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last > * triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same > - * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one > + * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one > * place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not > * set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should > * be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap. > @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, > mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex); > /* > * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading > - * the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or > + * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or > * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore, > * (either because another process truncated this branch, or > * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if Applied.
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index 940c961..533699c 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ failed_out: * the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after * we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last * triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same - * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one + * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one * place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not * set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should * be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap. @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex); /* * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading - * the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or + * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore, * (either because another process truncated this branch, or * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if
'excpet' should be 'except'. 'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> --- I found another one.