| Message ID | 4c29ab39998ef21898e930ad78588d105f4d81a5.1701247289.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show
Return-Path:
<SRS0=B4N9=HL=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-242-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org
Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=pp1 header.b=Ungc5id+;
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org;
spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org
(client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org;
envelope-from=srs0=b4n9=hl=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-242-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org;
receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)
Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org
[IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1))
(No client certificate requested)
by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SgyND0PHDz1ySd
for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 00:54:04 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76])
by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SgyNC70kdz4xkD
for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 00:54:03 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix)
id 4SgyNC6yQxz4xkM; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 00:54:03 +1100 (AEDT)
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org
Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org;
dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=pp1 header.b=Ungc5id+;
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org;
spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org
(client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; helo=ny.mirrors.kernel.org;
envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-242-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org;
receiver=ozlabs.org)
Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org
[IPv6:2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SgyNC3pjMz4xkD
for <patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 00:54:03 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org
[52.25.139.140])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B77A71C20E4B
for <patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CACE487BE;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:41 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com
header.b="Ungc5id+"
X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com
[148.163.158.5])
by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3761709;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id
3AUDFpFE006446;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:31 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com;
h=from : to : cc : subject
: date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version :
content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1;
bh=PNIwPfumSNnVlUUlBo/GDih8RAKZHb0Z2KAJ+LhauC0=;
b=Ungc5id+xDFLfOdwyqgvYbHfIvdJ1LgR1wfvB8HEWxM6aTunXdel15SkCiDS1+DH2NxQ
4dV6369cWKoDjbwBdL/ZsSevfNX97wwl6feyvymUaI3e7R6anF/EkNbYmlNM87v+IYC9
zWxKQsSA41B2sAD4mzLkTjz4oMr2AZJ4XStc0N4rZH9M+gozec21C8Qq3obLK3BKYK7g
tmqKxjiwNRBnWE0bf2/HaOSyKeVDnwLzb/1UJbk5WS1WHHNSVm/tEh2u9xSFEqqZK3tn
dGO9e+wbLEW6uEJkWGGepCx4rrNFvPPCJK9zeWAWVKzaq8knbq56Iz/aIRGZEova45eJ /A==
Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3upu4b983u-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:31 +0000
Received: from m0360072.ppops.net (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3AUDGX1i008254;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:30 GMT
Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com
(db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219])
by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3upu4b983b-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:30 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1])
by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id
3AUDmw70006089;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:29 GMT
Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225])
by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ukwy25vsj-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:29 +0000
Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com
[10.20.54.100])
by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
3AUDrSUq6554294
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:28 GMT
Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFABF2004B;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF7720043;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com.com (unknown
[9.43.76.38])
by smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>, dchinner@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC 1/7] iomap: Don't fall back to bufferred write if the write is
atomic
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:23:10 +0530
Message-Id:
<4c29ab39998ef21898e930ad78588d105f4d81a5.1701247289.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3
In-Reply-To: <cover.1701247289.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
References: <cover.1701247289.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-ext4+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-ext4+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: F5E9TSUM1DCcqBAO5JInTGaNPQrrdbge
X-Proofpoint-GUID: Ezm7edadeu2lyI1-UAjDTOwNZDGRhuxN
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard
engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26
definitions=2023-11-30_12,2023-11-30_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
suspectscore=0 phishscore=0
mlxlogscore=824 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0
priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0
malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
engine=8.12.0-2311060000 definitions=main-2311300102
|
| Series |
[RFC,1/7] iomap: Don't fall back to bufferred write if the write is atomic
|
expand
|
diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c index 6ef25e26f1a1..d7e6c6eacbf7 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c @@ -662,7 +662,13 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, if (ret != -EAGAIN) { trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos, iomi.len); - ret = -ENOTBLK; + /* + * if this write was supposed to be atomic, + * return the err rather than trying to fall + * back to bufferred IO. + */ + if (!atomic_write) + ret = -ENOTBLK; } goto out_free_dio; }
Currently, iomap only supports atomic writes for direct IOs and there is no guarantees that a bufferred IO will be atomic. Hence, if the user has explicitly requested the direct write to be atomic and there's a failure, return -EIO instead of falling back to bufferred IO. Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> --- fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)