@@ -93,20 +93,20 @@ typedef unsigned int ext4_group_t;
struct ext4_allocation_request {
/* target inode for block we're allocating */
struct inode *inode;
+ /* how many blocks we want to allocate */
+ unsigned int len;
/* logical block in target inode */
ext4_lblk_t logical;
- /* phys. target (a hint) */
- ext4_fsblk_t goal;
/* the closest logical allocated block to the left */
ext4_lblk_t lleft;
- /* phys. block for ^^^ */
- ext4_fsblk_t pleft;
/* the closest logical allocated block to the right */
ext4_lblk_t lright;
- /* phys. block for ^^^ */
+ /* phys. target (a hint) */
+ ext4_fsblk_t goal;
+ /* phys. block for the closest logical allocated block to the left */
+ ext4_fsblk_t pleft;
+ /* phys. block for the closest logical allocated block to the right */
ext4_fsblk_t pright;
- /* how many blocks we want to allocate */
- unsigned int len;
/* flags. see above EXT4_MB_HINT_* */
unsigned int flags;
};
As Ted noted, the ext4_allocation_request isn't well aligned. Looking at it with pahole we're wasting space on 64-bit arches: struct ext4_allocation_request { struct inode * inode; /* 0 8 */ ext4_lblk_t logical; /* 8 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ ext4_fsblk_t goal; /* 16 8 */ ext4_lblk_t lleft; /* 24 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ ext4_fsblk_t pleft; /* 32 8 */ ext4_lblk_t lright; /* 40 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ ext4_fsblk_t pright; /* 48 8 */ unsigned int len; /* 56 4 */ unsigned int flags; /* 60 4 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ /* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */ /* sum members: 52, holes: 3, sum holes: 12 */ }; grouping 32-bit members together closes these holes and shrinks the structure by 12 bytes. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> --- V2: fix comments, thanks to Mike Snitzer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html