@@ -1476,8 +1476,6 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb,
* active. */
ext4_r_blocks_count_set(es, ext4_r_blocks_count(es) +
reserved_blocks);
- ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
- unlock_buffer(sbi->s_sbh);
/* Update the free space counts */
percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter,
@@ -1513,6 +1511,8 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb,
ext4_calculate_overhead(sb);
es->s_overhead_clusters = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_overhead);
+ ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
+ unlock_buffer(sbi->s_sbh);
if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: added group %u:"
"%llu blocks(%llu free %llu reserved)\n", flex_gd->count,
When online resizing is performed twice consecutively, the error message "Superblock checksum does not match superblock" is displayed for the second time. Here's the reproducer: mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sdb 100M mount /dev/sdb /tmp/test resize2fs /dev/sdb 5G resize2fs /dev/sdb 6G To solve this issue, we moved the update of the checksum after the es->s_overhead_clusters is updated. Fixes: 026d0d27c488 ("ext4: reduce computation of overhead during resize") Fixes: de394a86658f ("ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)