From patchwork Tue Oct 18 02:27:01 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "yebin (H)" X-Patchwork-Id: 1691318 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=lsd/=2t=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MryJq3fMgz23jp for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:20:58 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MryJm40LWz4x1G for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:20:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4MryJm3xsYz4xFy; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:20:56 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MryJl4Lm8z4x1G for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:20:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230253AbiJRCUv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:20:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230165AbiJRCUo (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:20:44 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4112D7E026; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Mrxs22v4XzVhwZ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 10:00:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 10:04:57 +0800 From: Ye Bin To: , , CC: , , Ye Bin , Subject: [PATCH -next v2] ext4: fix warning in 'ext4_da_release_space' Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 10:27:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20221018022701.683489-1-yebin10@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Syzkaller report issue as follows: EXT4-fs (loop0): Free/Dirty block details EXT4-fs (loop0): free_blocks=0 EXT4-fs (loop0): dirty_blocks=0 EXT4-fs (loop0): Block reservation details EXT4-fs (loop0): i_reserved_data_blocks=0 EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1527: ext4_da_release_space: ino 18, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 92 at fs/ext4/inode.c:1528 ext4_da_release_space+0x25e/0x370 fs/ext4/inode.c:1524 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-09423-g493ffd6605b2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0) RIP: 0010:ext4_da_release_space+0x25e/0x370 fs/ext4/inode.c:1528 RSP: 0018:ffffc900015f6c90 EFLAGS: 00010296 RAX: 42215896cd52ea00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 42215896cd52ea00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 1ffff1100e907d96 R08: ffffffff816aa79d R09: fffff520002bece5 R10: fffff520002bece5 R11: 1ffff920002bece4 R12: ffff888021fd2000 R13: ffff88807483ecb0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88807483e740 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005555569ba628 CR3: 000000000c88e000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ext4_es_remove_extent+0x1ab/0x260 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:1461 mpage_release_unused_pages+0x24d/0xef0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1589 ext4_writepages+0x12eb/0x3be0 fs/ext4/inode.c:2852 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2469 __writeback_single_inode+0xd1/0x670 fs/fs-writeback.c:1587 writeback_sb_inodes+0xb3b/0x18f0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1870 wb_writeback+0x41f/0x7b0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2044 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2187 [inline] wb_workfn+0x3cb/0xef0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2227 process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306 Above issue may happens as follows: ext4_da_write_begin ext4_create_inline_data ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS); ext4_set_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA); __ext4_ioctl ext4_ext_migrate -> will lead to eh->eh_entries not zero, and set extent flag ext4_da_write_begin ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin ext4_da_map_blocks ext4_insert_delayed_block if (!ext4_es_scan_clu(inode, &ext4_es_is_delonly, lblk)) if (!ext4_es_scan_clu(inode, &ext4_es_is_mapped, lblk)) ext4_clu_mapped(inode, EXT4_B2C(sbi, lblk)); -> will return 1 allocated = true; ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(inode, lblk, allocated); ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent(handle, &mpd, &give_up_on_write); -> return -ENOSPC mpage_release_unused_pages(&mpd, give_up_on_write); -> give_up_on_write == 1 ext4_es_remove_extent ext4_da_release_space(inode, reserved); if (unlikely(to_free > ei->i_reserved_data_blocks)) -> to_free == 1 but ei->i_reserved_data_blocks == 0 -> then trigger warning as above To solve above issue, forbid inode do migrate which has inline data. Reported-by: syzbot+c740bb18df70ad00952e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/migrate.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/migrate.c b/fs/ext4/migrate.c index 0a220ec9862d..a19a9661646e 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/migrate.c +++ b/fs/ext4/migrate.c @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ int ext4_ext_migrate(struct inode *inode) * already is extent-based, error out. */ if (!ext4_has_feature_extents(inode->i_sb) || - (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))) + ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS) || + ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) return -EINVAL; if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_blocks == 0)