| Message ID | 20100514214200.8B9DB1BC317@ruihe.smo.corp.google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c index 3c6f91c..c5dc01a 100644 --- a/e2fsck/pass1.c +++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c @@ -1690,8 +1690,8 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx, is_dir = LINUX_S_ISDIR(pctx->inode->i_mode); problem = 0; - if (extent.e_pblk < ctx->fs->super->s_first_data_block || - extent.e_pblk >= ext2fs_blocks_count(ctx->fs->super)) + if (extent.e_pblk <= ctx->fs->super->s_first_data_block || + extent.e_pblk > ext2fs_blocks_count(ctx->fs->super)) problem = PR_1_EXTENT_BAD_START_BLK; else if (extent.e_lblk < start_block) problem = PR_1_OUT_OF_ORDER_EXTENTS;
This patch changes e2fsck to use the same checking on the validity of an extent as the kernel ext4 is using. Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html