From patchwork Sat Apr 20 15:17:38 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Atish Kumar Patra X-Patchwork-Id: 1925766 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=SixG15lp; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=dahq29ig; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VLrwf6YZ6z1yZP for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 09:49:54 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rubpqeOvoGh4Oy/Tsrcgt6c1Bpi2cLM8XnYatCC+Zwk=; b=SixG15lp3j7DnL fwZb3plEmKpUE2hEfh1kfQNgO5A9AWO63joFIVzLfvMU55XS6kZLtzU1MkbpWRt2nXo39X2PYdodJ KD6qxFhjhV7vwhTh4MyBgpFtPIfQ97PxgXbbo4JBaRZnOlrhZo7ewJhF5b52iCxUzhqT87siAJsaL z5YVviFinxrh4G6TrnoVEUXZTUB2XTfdl/IFLn2qYBsCdaUXZyGab2Y4f7kpXRlUeXTcrOBib84IF taR7sFgeboclLFQD2mOmMnoOyFq9i/1XwEhaZJg5/gJAGHLF0izs+h5Ts6DeQ8WgB1d9nLk7EXBoF mMCHZVQ3eGSB4FVqyBMQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxxzN-00000007KGj-13fW; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:49:53 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxxxx-00000007J3F-1dvD for kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:48:32 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e3ca4fe4cfso20509335ad.2 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1713570505; x=1714175305; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=k/mZsCXDIiEsYT4IyH2AIBXmm9ZHxCdzgU5y8aMm+wo=; b=dahq29igmme7kRwIhmKE+9WEdyXzzlV3X4KNH5dN1UpYHYUYJcJq+Vi6O9URe9NUZw LMpUf8Gn96gBC1W4VPU7ExJhjeD3FXbdQDQ7J2C3b8H4Vj6/PHrW54Hi4T/rW6p7WJIR 8J3IsPIIax7EAT6A0kIcs1GKVgC9G+G6IjRvo8qHIigyt0JueGLhyGpTTr5Uvnh/a3Py BOjZYxxJNwdWWj236SDlwGG8vYGDomIa4fpoYlp0BO9WDRHT/XV90M3Y060UJB6S7Fka fFaXXd8DEnG919vy7vJdNuYKltOidrBMW29cEpP6vVQPqa9dcoonb+lFwrnYkwBL5Sxu 7xmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713570505; x=1714175305; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k/mZsCXDIiEsYT4IyH2AIBXmm9ZHxCdzgU5y8aMm+wo=; b=CtKIlvmFwt3uZyKNl8T7Yx8EFy9UmbI7wbQ1+fb79a/n3DvoFgei2cyZLvVUfodC6i F/ihL6LLZ/SmA0L0fRqyMONfpmkxUvUkDdpFlD9535+6MW26dLTRdsVLmd9w6EOqUYx7 SjDGs9O2bG9oF59DaJW7fcXyqEW22QK7cfpS3L5rW8Dqcse07yaGbLZKrxnuUh9AzY7Y 4b1/wNhZGo6fL634F/BCgLRLUi5FV4c8Uws1/6MjFIIbpNCKLrVdcn/Efcs5lbenAQ/I qYEW5jo3wyWAhP1CYacTNfB2c8kTYHmeJHlcKrWZkM4Sxz7VKERQXB490X6+wPxByTaH 4sKA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWMa9UilQISFc8EnTGjnr6gv+jJ6yPLycE5cnCaI2mOxmR9O2/Tx7xWaiLGn+DH+jY4FxoNEeoGGZvDqZwLBmsK63zg0QIoCsXSl4V5/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLJONeGOl2L3WZcRQaKWWs4bN2aoY/utDesEdLLN/AkMVLqNP2 W2/e+4RtgGeq33/kU3no3JKAZV+DJ8ARqnOpANQ+PWRYbYsJi8FP/Kh78rzIztM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF+aoD5WgVZpoEDtEmpVoIMpg0OJuDqmNC+S8wL2PSmvGrxxoIhzREjLcyxzn9Zxh9U5qFFPg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7286:b0:1e7:7832:386c with SMTP id d6-20020a170902728600b001e77832386cmr3679550pll.52.1713570504749; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atishp.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w17-20020a170902d11100b001e42f215f33sm3924017plw.85.2024.04.19.16.48.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:48:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Atish Patra To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Andrew Jones , Anup Patel , Ajay Kaher , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , samuel.holland@sifive.com, Conor Dooley , Juergen Gross , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Palmer Dabbelt , Paolo Bonzini , Paul Walmsley , Shuah Khan , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 22/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:17:38 -0700 Message-Id: <20240420151741.962500-23-atishp@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240420151741.962500-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> References: <20240420151741.962500-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240419_164825_635966_4EC96E13 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.66 ) X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Verify PMU snapshot functionality by setting up the shared memory correctly and reading the counter values from the shared memory instead of the CSR. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Anup Patel Signed-off-by: Atish Patra --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h | 2 [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:635 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 2.5 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date X-BeenThere: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kvm-riscv" Errors-To: kvm-riscv-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org Verify PMU snapshot functionality by setting up the shared memory correctly and reading the counter values from the shared memory instead of the CSR. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Anup Patel Signed-off-by: Atish Patra Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h | 25 +++ .../selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c | 12 ++ .../selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h index 6675ca673c77..046b432ae896 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ #ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H #define SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H +/* SBI spec version fields */ +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_DEFAULT 0x1 +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT 24 +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK 0x7f +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MINOR_MASK 0xffffff + /* SBI return error codes */ #define SBI_SUCCESS 0 #define SBI_ERR_FAILURE -1 @@ -33,6 +39,9 @@ enum sbi_ext_id { }; enum sbi_ext_base_fid { + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION = 0, + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID, + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_VERSION, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT = 3, }; enum sbi_ext_pmu_fid { @@ -60,6 +69,12 @@ union sbi_pmu_ctr_info { }; }; +struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data { + u64 ctr_overflow_mask; + u64 ctr_values[64]; + u64 reserved[447]; +}; + struct sbiret { long error; long value; @@ -113,4 +128,14 @@ struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0, bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val); +/* Make SBI version */ +static inline unsigned long sbi_mk_version(unsigned long major, + unsigned long minor) +{ + return ((major & SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK) << SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT) + | (minor & SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MINOR_MASK); +} + +unsigned long get_host_sbi_spec_version(void); + #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c index e8211f5d6863..ccb35573749c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c @@ -502,3 +502,15 @@ bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val) return true; } + +unsigned long get_host_sbi_spec_version(void) +{ + struct sbiret ret; + + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION, 0, + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + + GUEST_ASSERT(!ret.error); + + return ret.value; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c index 7c81691e39c5..9002ff451abf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ #define RISCV_MAX_PMU_COUNTERS 64 union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo_arr[RISCV_MAX_PMU_COUNTERS]; +/* Snapshot shared memory data */ +#define PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE BIT(30) +static void *snapshot_gva; +static vm_paddr_t snapshot_gpa; + /* Cache the available counters in a bitmask */ static unsigned long counter_mask_available; @@ -186,6 +191,32 @@ static unsigned long read_counter(int idx, union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo) return counter_val; } +static inline void verify_sbi_requirement_assert(void) +{ + long out_val = 0; + bool probe; + + probe = guest_sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_PMU, &out_val); + GUEST_ASSERT(probe && out_val == 1); + + if (get_host_sbi_spec_version() < sbi_mk_version(2, 0)) + __GUEST_ASSERT(0, "SBI implementation version doesn't support PMU Snapshot"); +} + +static void snapshot_set_shmem(vm_paddr_t gpa, unsigned long flags) +{ + unsigned long lo = (unsigned long)gpa; +#if __riscv_xlen == 32 + unsigned long hi = (unsigned long)(gpa >> 32); +#else + unsigned long hi = gpa == -1 ? -1 : 0; +#endif + struct sbiret ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, + lo, hi, flags, 0, 0, 0); + + GUEST_ASSERT(ret.value == 0 && ret.error == 0); +} + static void test_pmu_event(unsigned long event) { unsigned long counter; @@ -234,6 +265,59 @@ static void test_pmu_event(unsigned long event) stop_reset_counter(counter, 0); } +static void test_pmu_event_snapshot(unsigned long event) +{ + unsigned long counter; + unsigned long counter_value_pre, counter_value_post; + unsigned long counter_init_value = 100; + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *snapshot_data = snapshot_gva; + + counter = get_counter_index(0, counter_mask_available, 0, event); + counter_value_pre = read_counter(counter, ctrinfo_arr[counter]); + + /* Do not set the initial value */ + start_counter(counter, 0, 0); + dummy_func_loop(10000); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + + /* The counter value is updated w.r.t relative index of cbase */ + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_post > counter_value_pre, + "Event update verification failed: post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_value_pre); + + /* + * We can't just update the counter without starting it. + * Do start/stop twice to simulate that by first initializing to a very + * high value and a low value after that. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], ULONG_MAX/2); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + counter_value_pre = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], counter_init_value); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_pre > counter_value_post, + "Counter reinitialization verification failed : post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_value_pre); + + /* Now set the initial value and compare */ + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], counter_init_value); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + dummy_func_loop(10000); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_post > counter_init_value, + "Event update verification failed: post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_init_value); + + stop_reset_counter(counter, 0); +} + static void test_invalid_event(void) { struct sbiret ret; @@ -301,6 +385,34 @@ static void test_pmu_basic_sanity(void) GUEST_DONE(); } +static void test_pmu_events_snaphost(void) +{ + int num_counters = 0; + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *snapshot_data = snapshot_gva; + int i; + + /* Verify presence of SBI PMU and minimum requrired SBI version */ + verify_sbi_requirement_assert(); + + snapshot_set_shmem(snapshot_gpa, 0); + + /* Get the counter details */ + num_counters = get_num_counters(); + update_counter_info(num_counters); + + /* Validate shared memory access */ + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_overflow_mask), 0); + for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++) { + if (counter_mask_available & (BIT(i))) + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[i]), 0); + } + /* Only these two events are guranteed to be present */ + test_pmu_event_snapshot(SBI_PMU_HW_CPU_CYCLES); + test_pmu_event_snapshot(SBI_PMU_HW_INSTRUCTIONS); + + GUEST_DONE(); +} + static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct ucall uc; @@ -357,6 +469,35 @@ static void test_vm_events_test(void *guest_code) test_vm_destroy(vm); } +static void test_vm_setup_snapshot_mem(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + /* PMU Snapshot requires single page only */ + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, 1, 1, 0); + /* PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE is identity mapped */ + virt_map(vm, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, 1); + + snapshot_gva = (void *)(PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE); + snapshot_gpa = addr_gva2gpa(vcpu->vm, (vm_vaddr_t)snapshot_gva); + sync_global_to_guest(vcpu->vm, snapshot_gva); + sync_global_to_guest(vcpu->vm, snapshot_gpa); +} + +static void test_vm_events_snapshot_test(void *guest_code) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm = NULL; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); + __TEST_REQUIRE(__vcpu_has_sbi_ext(vcpu, KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_PMU), + "SBI PMU not available, skipping test"); + + test_vm_setup_snapshot_mem(vm, vcpu); + + run_vcpu(vcpu); + + test_vm_destroy(vm); +} + int main(void) { test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity); @@ -365,5 +506,8 @@ int main(void) test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events); pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n"); + test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost); + pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test : PASS\n"); + return 0; }