diff mbox series

[v2,11/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to allocate kvm_mmu_page structs from vCPU caches

Message ID 20220311002528.2230172-12-dmatlack@google.com
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack March 11, 2022, 12:25 a.m. UTC
Now that allocating a kvm_mmu_page struct is isolated to a helper
function, it can be re-used in the TDP MMU.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 3 +--
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      | 8 +-------
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Xu March 15, 2022, 10:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:25:13AM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
>  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> -
> -	sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
> -	sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
> -	set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
> -
> -	return sp;
> +	return kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu, true);
>  }

Similarly I had a feeling we could drop tdp_mmu_alloc_sp() too.. anyway:

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
David Matlack March 22, 2022, 10:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:27 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:25:13AM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> >  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> > -     struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> > -
> > -     sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
> > -     sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
> > -     set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
> > -
> > -     return sp;
> > +     return kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu, true);
> >  }
>
> Similarly I had a feeling we could drop tdp_mmu_alloc_sp() too.. anyway:

Certainly, but I think it simplifies the TDP MMU code to keep it. It abstracts
away the implementation detail that a TDP MMU shadow page is allocated
the same way as a shadow MMU shadow page with direct=true.


>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 2dcafbef5ffc..4c8feaeb063d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1704,8 +1704,7 @@  static void drop_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	mmu_spte_clear_no_track(parent_pte);
 }
 
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-						      bool direct)
+struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool direct)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 5f91e4d07a95..d4e2de5f2a6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@  void unaccount_huge_nx_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 
 struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_direct_sp_for_split(bool locked);
 
+struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool direct);
 void kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 
 #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_INTERNAL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 184874a82a1b..f285fd76717b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -269,13 +269,7 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
-
-	sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
-	sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
-	set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
-
-	return sp;
+	return kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu, true);
 }
 
 static void tdp_mmu_init_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, tdp_ptep_t sptep,