Message ID | 20151116214413.26babb5f@kryten |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Anton Blanchard wrote: > When looking at the code generated for pow() on ppc64 I noticed quite > a few sign extensions. Making the array indices unsigned reduces the > number of sign extensions from 24 to 7. OK with a ChangeLog entry if you've done the usual testing with the testsuite without any new ulps for pow appearing (you didn't say).
diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_pow.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_pow.c index 3b0bbe3..adbd5b8 100644 --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_pow.c +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_pow.c @@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ static double SECTION log1 (double x, double *delta, double *error) { - int i, j, m; + unsigned int i, j; + int m; double uu, vv, eps, nx, e, e1, e2, t, t1, t2, res, add = 0; mynumber u, v; #ifdef BIG_ENDI @@ -344,7 +345,8 @@ static double SECTION my_log2 (double x, double *delta, double *error) { - int i, j, m; + unsigned int i, j; + int m; double uu, vv, eps, nx, e, e1, e2, t, t1, t2, res, add = 0; double ou1, ou2, lu1, lu2, ov, lv1, lv2, a, a1, a2; double y, yy, z, zz, j1, j2, j7, j8;