| Message ID | yddk0qoh0sb.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | testsuite: i386: Fix gcc.target/i386/pr95798-?.c on Solaris | expand |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:36:20PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote: > The new gcc.target/i386/pr95798-?.c tests FAIL on 64-bit Solaris/x86: > > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 1, 8\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 2, 16\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 3, 24\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 4, 32\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 5, 40\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 6, 48\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c scan-assembler 7, 56\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 1, 8\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 2, 16\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 3, 24\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 4, 32\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 5, 40\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 6, 48\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c scan-assembler 7, 56\\\\(%rsp,%r[a-z0-9]*,8\\\\) > > This happens because Solaris/amd64 defaults to -fno-omit-frame-pointer > and can be avoided by always passing -fomit-frame-pointer. > > Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Ok for master? Ok, thanks. > 2021-03-02 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> > > gcc/testsuite: > * gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c: Add -fomit-frame-pointer to > dg-options. > * gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c: Likewise. Jakub
# HG changeset patch # Parent bedda525d3ac004d2d10680b74fcadf8324f1b5c testsuite: i386: Fix gcc.target/i386/pr95798-?.c on Solaris diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-1.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* PR target/95798 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att -fomit-frame-pointer" } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "1, 8\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "2, 16\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "3, 24\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95798-2.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* PR target/95798 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -masm=att -fomit-frame-pointer" } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "1, 8\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "2, 16\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "3, 24\\\(%rsp,%r\[a-z0-9]*,8\\\)" { target lp64 } } } */