Message ID | trinity-ba2b5ea3-94b1-46b6-b4c9-f9d4ae39e43e-1620153258445@3c-app-gmx-bap01 |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | *PING* [PATCH] PR fortran/100274 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131 | expand |
LGTM, OK for trunk and back ports. On 5/4/21 11:34 AM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: > PING! > > --- > > Dear Fortranners, > > Gerhard found a case where the mismatch of actual and formal argument lead > to an ICE instead of the relevant warning. Furthermore, the special case > of character argument avoided the check that the actual argument must be > definable if the formal one is INTENT-OUT or -INOUT. The check was already > there, it just did not get triggered here. > > The patch is close to obvious, trivial and self-explaining. I chose to > continue doing the argument checking after emitting the warning. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > OK for mainline? OK for backports to the affected branches? > > Thanks, > Harald > > > PR fortran/100274 - ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131 > > When the check for the length of formal and actual character arguments > found a mismatch and emitted a warning, it would skip further checks > like that could lead to errors. Fix that by continuing the checking. > Also catch a NULL pointer dereference. > > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/100274 > * interface.c (gfc_compare_actual_formal): Continue checks after > emitting warning for argument length mismatch. > * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Check for NULL pointer > dereference. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/100274 > * gfortran.dg/argument_checking_25.f90: New test. >
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.c b/gcc/fortran/interface.c index 60736123550..9e3e8aa9da9 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/interface.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.c @@ -3255,10 +3255,13 @@ gfc_compare_actual_formal (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gfc_formal_arglist *formal, && f->sym->attr.flavor != FL_PROCEDURE) { if (a->expr->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && !f->sym->as && where) - gfc_warning (0, "Character length of actual argument shorter " - "than of dummy argument %qs (%lu/%lu) at %L", - f->sym->name, actual_size, formal_size, - &a->expr->where); + { + gfc_warning (0, "Character length of actual argument shorter " + "than of dummy argument %qs (%lu/%lu) at %L", + f->sym->name, actual_size, formal_size, + &a->expr->where); + goto skip_size_check; + } else if (where) { /* Emit a warning for -std=legacy and an error otherwise. */ diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c index 213f32b0a67..a10170c7dff 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c @@ -6128,6 +6128,7 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym, bool add_clobber; add_clobber = fsym && fsym->attr.intent == INTENT_OUT && !fsym->attr.allocatable && !fsym->attr.pointer + && e->symtree && e->symtree->n.sym && !e->symtree->n.sym->attr.dimension && !e->symtree->n.sym->attr.pointer && !e->symtree->n.sym->attr.allocatable diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/argument_checking_25.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/argument_checking_25.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e699160fee1 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/argument_checking_25.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! PR fortran/100274 - ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131 + +program p + call s('y') ! { dg-warning "Character length of actual argument" } +contains + subroutine s(x) + character(8), intent(out) :: x + end +end + +! { dg-error "in variable definition context" " " { target *-*-* } 5 }